I've been following this one for a while. My personal theory is that he's a Bush appointee who's trying to get a lot of publicity to create a backlash against laws that protect citizens.  
Now, it's a pair of pants.  Next thing you know, all the families of people that died from asbestos exposure won't have a leg to stand on (or pants to wear) and Halliburton and Dick Cheney will be in the pink, or rather, in the green. 
Otherwise reasonable people already think the country is sinking under frivolous lawsuits, such as ones against NASCAR, despite a total lack of evidence.  The reason that NASCAR tracks are shutting down (and can't get a toehold in new markets like Washington State) is because they are total financial sinkholes that drain local economies for the benefit of a few. 
Much like the war in Iraq, which is why they shove stories about pants and Paris Hilton at us, to distract us.
If I forgot to send this yesterday, I'll send it now.  If I did send it, it's worth reading again: 
June       12, 2007
        Blackout
        Things       Your Media Momma Didn't Tell You
        By DAVE LINDORFF
        The fact that most Americans oppose       the war in Iraq, and want the president impeached, is testimony       to the native intelligence and common sense of the citizens of       this nation. 
        It sure isn't thanks to the       quality of the news we're getting here in America.!
        Here are some of the things       you don't know if you just depend on the corporate media for       your information:
                 1. Most Americans would like         to see this president and vice president impeached and removed         from office. Newsweek magazine published a scientific         poll last October showing that 51 percent of us favor impeachment         (including 29 percent of Republicans!), but the corporate media,         which normally hasn't met a poll it won't publish, didn't publicize         this one. And now, when the numbers supporting impeachment are         surely even higher, you can't even pay a polling outfit         to ask the question. No wonder most people who favor impeachment         still think they're odd ducks.
          
         2. There is a bill, filed in the House of Representatives on         April 24 by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), calling for the impeachment         of Vice President Cheney.  Since it was filed, it has gained         six co-sponsors, including a member of the House Democratic leadership,         Rep. Janice Shakowsky (D-IL). Most major media have ignored this         important story completely. Most Americans also don't know that         the Vermont State Senate voted overwhelmingly this spring to         call on Congress to impeach the president.
          
         3. The president has been declared a felon in federal court.         Yet even after Federal District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ruled         last August that President Bush and the National Security Agency         were committing serial Class A felonies and were violating both         the First and Fourth Amendments by spying on Americans' communications         without first obtaining warrants, Bush continued ordering the         NSA to continue the patently illegal program for at least half         a year. In reports on the spying program, the corporate media         never mention that it has been declared a felonious activity         by the federal court.
          
         4.  Fifteen Democratic Party state organizations have passed         impeachment resolutions calling on Democrats in Congress to initiate         impeachment proceedings against the president and vice president.         The most recent of these, the Democratic Party of Oklahoma, passed         its resolution at the party's annual convention on May 19. Other         Democratic Party conventions, in states from Nevada and California         to Massachusetts and North Carolina, have passed similar resolutions.         Most have been ignored by the corporate media even in their own         states.
 
         5. Bush's so-called "coalition of the willing" is not         so willing and is not really much of a coalition either. When's         the last time you've heard how many countries are on board with         the US in the war and occupation of Iraq? The reality? Britain,         the only significant contributor of combat troops besides the         U.S., is pulling out, as did Italy and Spain, and many other         countries, like Denmark, Lithuania and others, plan to be out         of Iraq by August or at the latest December. One indication of         the seriousness of situation: The Pentagon no longer lists the         countries that are members of the "coalition." The         only mainstream report I've seen laying this out this collapse         in international support for Bush's war was in USA Today         last February.
         6. The Homeland Security Department         last year awarded Halliburton $385 million in a no-bid contract         to construct prison camps designed to hold tens of thousands         of unspecified prisoners in the event of domestic unrest. Meanwhile,         President Bush has signed a bill altering the insurrection act         so that he can declare martial rule and order active duty troops         to take charge anywhere in the domestic US in the event of "public         disorder." No one in the corporate media has reported on         these developments or asked the White House to explain what it's         all about.
 
         7. There is evidence that Cheney, as CEO of Halliburton, was         a patron of the Washington Madam whose client book of high-class         call-girls is causing many in Washington political circles-mostly         Republicans it appears, who apparently need to pay for their         sex-to sweat. So far no mention of the Cheney angle in the corporate         media, though they've been having fun with the broader story         of a political sex scandal. No mention either of how a brave         West Point cadet refused to shake Cheney's hand on stage when         the vice president was handing out this year's diplomas at the         Army's premiere academy.
         8. Among the "worst of         the worst" of the "evildoers" captured and held         as "enemy combatants" at Guantanamo were children,         some of them preteens and kids who were under 15 when captured         and brought to Cuba-so many in fact that the military had to         set up a special facility, called Camp Iguana, just for adolescent         and pre-pubescent "fighters." The corporate media have         barely reported on this atrocity (the New York Times ran         only one article mentioning child captives, in June 2005).  The         only wider coverage of this outrage came recently when the government         tried to prosecute one such alleged child "terrorist"-Omar         Khadr-only to have the military judge in charge toss his case         out because the government had misclassified him. Khadr, we learned,         was captured in 2001 in Afghanistan at the ripe age of 15, making         him one of the older child captives brought to and interrogated         at Guantanamo. Under international law, the U.S. was supposed         to treat this and other child soldiers as victims, not as war         criminals. Khadr, a Canadian by birth, instead has spent five         years doing hard time in US captivity.
         9. Well-researched reports         on the rampant theft of both the 2000 and 2004 elections, and         on Republican plans for theft of the 2008 election, such as Mark         Crispin Miller's Fooled Again, have gone unmentioned in         the corporate media. Books on the subject, like Miller's and         like Greg Palast's best selling Armed Madhouse, have never         been reviewed. 
 
         10. And of course, there's my own book. The Case for Impeachment,         despite its having sold over 20,000 copies in hardcover, and         despite its having now come out in a mass-market paperback edition,         in both cases printed by a mainstream publisher, St. Martin's         Press, has not received a single review in the corporate media.         In this, my co-author Barbara Olshansky and I are not alone.         None of the books on the impeachable crimes of this administration,         including one by Nixon-era impeachment panelist and former congresswoman         Elizabeth Holtzman, and one by Judiciary Chair Rep. John Conyers,         has been reviewed by a mainstream media outlet. 
        What we're talking about here       is a media blackout of important stories and news.
        Thanks to the internet and       to the grapevine, and thanks to their basic native intelligence,       most Americans seem to understand that we're being lied to and       cheated. What the media blackout of important news does manage       to do, however, is keep us all thinking that we are in a minority       in opposing things like illegal wars, a trampled Constitution,       and stolen elections. 
        In fact, however, we're actually       the majority.
        Once we realize this, maybe       we will have a movement, instead of a just nation of isolated       cynics and complainers.
        Dave Lindorff is the author of Killing       Time: an Investigation into the Death Row Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal. His n       book of CounterPunch columns titled "This       Can't be Happening!" is published by Common Courage       Press. Lindorff's newest book is "The       Case for Impeachment",
       co-authored by Barbara Olshansky.
On 6/13/07, kdhaisch@aol.com  <kdhaisch@aol.com> wrote:                                      
file this one under 
 THE LEGAL SYSTEM GONE  NUTS!!!
  
  
  Judge Presses $54-Million  Suit Over Pants
  
 Man Leaves Court Crying After  Discussing Lost Trousers
  
   
 AP
  WASHINGTON (June 12) - A judge had to leave the  courtroom with tears running down his  face Tuesday after recalling the lost pair of trousers that led to his  $54-million lawsuit against a dry cleaner. 
  
   -----------------------------
  
 damn Chinese laundries!!!
  
   Jacquelyn Martin, AP
 Dry cleaners Jin Nam  Chung and Ki Chung are being sued for $54 million by Washington, D.C., Judge Roy  Pearson over a pair of missing pants. 
  ------------------------------------
  
 Administrative law judge Roy L. Pearson had argued earlier in his opening  statement that he is acting in the  interest of all city residents against poor business practices. Defense  attorneys called his claim "outlandish." 
 
He originally sued Custom Cleaners for about $65-million under the District of  Columbia consumer protection act and almost $2-million in common law claims. He is  no longer seeking damages related to the  pants, instead focusing his claims on two signs in the shop that have  since been removed. 
He alleges that Jin Chung, Soo Chung and Ki Chung,  owners of the mom-and-pop business, committed fraud and misled consumers with  signs that claimed "Satisfaction  Guaranteed" and "Same Day  Service." 
  
 False Advertising!!!  I'll sue for  $100-Bajillion !!!!
 
Pearson, representing  himself, said in opening that he wanted to examine the culture that  allowed "a group of Oriental defendants to engage in bad business practices for  five years." 
An attorney for the Chungs portrayed Pearson as a bitter man with financial troubles  stemming from a  recent divorce who is taking out  his anger on a hardworking family. 
"This case is very simple. It's about  one sign and the plaintiff's outlandish interpretation," attorney Chris Manning  said. 
The Chungs were to present their case Wednesday. Manning asked  D.C. Superior Court Judge Judith  Bartnoff to award them reimbursement for their legal costs if they win. 
  
 this might go to the Supreme Court  !!!
 
 
  Pearson called several witnesses Tuesday who  testified that they stopped going  to Custom Cleaners after problems with misplaced clothes. 
  
 so we might be talking  about 3 or 4 lost pants !!!
 
Pearson also called himself as a witness, saying his  problems began in May 2005 when he brought in several suits for alterations. A  pair of pants from a blue and  maroon suit was missing when he requested it two days later. He said Soo  Chung tried to give him a pair of charcoal gray pants. 
  
 gray pants for a blue and  maroon suit???
 that will NEVER do  !!!!!!!
 
As Pearson explained that those weren't the pants for the suit, he  choked up and left the courtroom  crying after asking Bartnoff for  a break. 
  
 he cried like a  baby!!!  cried like Paris Hilton !!!
 
Pearson originally asked the cleaners for  the full price of the suit, which  was more than $1,000. But because the Chungs insisted the pants had been found,  they refused to pay. 
Manning has said the cleaners made three settlement offers to Pearson, but  the judge was not satisfied and increased his demands -- including asking for  money to rent a car so he could  drive to another business. 
  
 what problems he  has!
 and the rest of the country  only has to worry
 about the war in Iraq  !!!
 
 
 Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. The  information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast,  rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The  Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL. 
 2007-06-12  16:45:31
   
  
  
 .