I've finally achieved consistency in my life. Any person of average or above intelligence can predict what I will say next with unerring accuracy. And what I say will always be wrong.

Saturday, March 19, 2005

Right on, dude!

This guy is so far ahead of me... I'm trying to grow up too, but it's
hard leaving behind all that stupid hippy shit the enemies of america
pumped into my weak brain...

www.counterpunch.org
Weekend Edition
March 19 / 20, 2005
Nature Isn't Real
Good Material for Material Goods

By BEN TRIPP

Sometimes, when I think about what's going on with the natural world,
I get a little sad. But after the tears have dried and the Rohypnol
does its thing, I remember that God loves me. So everything will be
okay. I'm just too attached to material goods, and that, brothers and
sisters, is not the way to get into heaven, as our savior and
all-around #1 guy Jesus Christ pointed out on numerous occasions.
Probably he said it even more times than the disciples actually wrote
down. I've been working on this hang-up, though. I stopped being
attached to fancy cars and big houses and those stainless steel
barbecues the size of U-boat quarterdecks. But try as I might, I just
can't give up those wide open spaces.

I think it started during the Ford administration, when I was a
schoolboy. Back then we were utterly indoctrinated into materialism.
It was all about the Grand Canyon, the vast reaches of the Arctic
tundra, mighty rivers running through primordial forests of fir and
fern. America was like some gigantic beer commercial, and it all
belonged to us. "This land is your land, this land is my land/ From
Cauliflower, to the Newark Highlands", we would sing. This goes to
show public education was already beyond repair in 1976. We were
warned not to litter on OUR LAND, partly because it would make the
Indian cry, but mostly because it was OUR LAND. Don't throw litter out
the windows of your Oldsmobile Vista Cruiser that gets 8 miles per
gallon, because littering is bad for OUR LAND. So I got the feeling
that I owned America, in a general kind of way, even if I didn't have
the keys. This is a ridiculous attitude, and set me up for
disappointment later on.

Let us look at an example of how my delusional thinking led me abaft:
trees. As the years went by, more and more old-growth redwood trees
were cut down to make patio decks for Sunset Magazine articles. Entire
forests of lesser trees disappeared, as well, probably to build
subdivisions on reclaimed wetlands. I took it personally, because I
thought those were my trees, at least the ones on public land. The
government was selling my trees to lumber companies, and I wasn't
getting a dime of the proceeds. Later on I found out it's crazy to
just have trees standing there doing nothing, when with a little
judicious felling they could create JOBS. And that's what has been
getting me all mixed up.

Jobs, like the economy, or net worth, or God, are real things. You can
measure them. They occupy mass. Things like trees, rivers, and coal
underneath mountains are nothing more than commodities. 'Commodities'
is just a word. It's a mere idea. 'Tree' is just a word. Trees are
mere ideas. If you go around believing that things are 'real', just
because there's a word for them, the next thing you know you're
marching for 'peace'. Can 'peace' blow up a village full of Southeast
Asians? Of course not. So it isn't real. War, on the other hand, is
real. Ask anybody that lives in a country with land mines. So I began
the long, painful process of disengaging myself from the illusory
notion that one can 'own' anything, when after all we're just an
agglomeration of electrons whizzing around in the shape of a human,
and electrons can't own anything.

I'm making progress. Just the other day it was announced that we would
be drilling for oil in some Arctic wildlife refuge. Time was, this
would have bothered me. "Hey, that's MY wildlife refuge, " I would
have said, not realizing what a child I was being (I was probably a
child at the time). Sure it's my wildlife refuge. It's all of our
wildlife refuge, and it's just taking up space. When we're dead, it
will make any difference to us personally if we drilled it or even
hammered a few nails into it? You can't take it with you, people! Your
grandchildren will never even miss the thing. Give up this crazy
materialism and get with Jesus. Either way, it will all soon end when
the Book of Revelations comes true and the world is destroyed, so we
might as well gas up while we can. Did God go easy on the dinosaurs,
just because they were environmentally correct? Let's face it, people:
if we can't really own it, we might as well use it. When the End Times
come, you'll find me praying on my bitchen new gas-powered redwood
deck.

Ben Tripp can be reached at credel@earthlink.net.

His book, 'Square In The Nuts', has been held up at the printers by
thugs but will be released as soon as hostage negotiations conclude.

See also www.cafeshops.com/tarantulabros.

Your program

I haven't been a tv watcher for 31 years. Oh, sure, like 2nd hand
smoke, it's unavoidable, especially at my parent's place, where I'm
currently vacationing.

Tonight I saw you people take a nice looking young lady and turn her
into something that resembled one of those packages of liver under
shrink wrap you see in the meat section of a supermarket. She seemed
happy with the change, but I think her real problem was her
unsupportive family and friends who undermined her self-esteme and
made her feel like she was worthless.

However, I am not writing to you to give you the criticism you so
richly deserve. I'm writing to offer myself up for an extreme
makeover. I'm happy with the way that I look. I am old, fat, bald,
bearded, fat and nearsighted, and I am at peace with that.

However, I need to get myself back into some sort of reasonable
physical shape. I have an open challenge to Toby Keith to meet me in
physical combat. I realize that violence doesn't solve anything. Only
morons like Toby Keith believe something that stupid. However, I just
think it's important that I show the world what a phony and pussy he
really is.

I don't think that he'll give me a lot of trouble. The big dirtbag is
afraid of his own bald head! This is a pretty common condition with
people in country music - the same can be said about Kenny Chesney,
TIm McGraw, Alan Jackson, half of Brooks and Dunn, etc. But my
argument with them is aesthetic, not political. Jackson at least is
open and honest that his politics are pre-stone age - he says "hey,
I'm a dumbshit and I'm proud of it! Iran? I Iraq? What's the
difference? I don't know! I don't care! coo coo! coo coo!"

Still, despite nothing but a big bloated bag of hot air, Keith does
have a size and a reach advantage. If you guys could work with me to
get me some physical training, a little martial arts skills, etc, Toby
and me could put on a real good show for the poor dumb assholes that
watch reality tv and have no lives.

My folks can be forgiven - my dad is over 90, my mom is over 80. but
people my age watch your show. Shame, shame, shame. It would inspire
your viewers for them to see one of your contestants do something
useful - like kicking Toby Keith's ass, instead of getting some kind
of pansy new haircut. Give them a chance. Give me a chance. Let me
give Toby Keith a boot in the ass. It's the American way!

SIncerely,

Matt Love

Friday, March 18, 2005

Re: [Canadianclassicrocksuckers] Digest Number 335

that's right, be a friend to somebody in the military. Tell them to QUIT!!!!!!!

On 15 Mar 2005 00:42:10 -0000,
Canadianclassicrocksuckers@yahoogroups.com
wrote:
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
> Has someone you know been affected by illness or disease?
> Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness efforts!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/pKxVKC/UOnJAA/n1hLAA/9cLolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
> There is 1 message in this issue.
>
> Topics in this digest:
>
> 1. Hi,are there any military lovers, admirers, and military person here?
> From: "avecbetter3000"
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:42:40 -0000
> From: "avecbetter3000"
> Subject: Hi,are there any military lovers, admirers, and military person here?
>
> This is the dedicated site for making friends, pen pals, and lovers
> in military.
>
> Very specialized, you can meet tons of members there.
>
> What you need to do is write a free profile and then waiting for
> other's news.
>
> http://militaryromance.true.ws/
> http://militaryfriend.zu5.net/
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canadianclassicrocksuckers/
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Canadianclassicrocksuckers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

What Wrong With People?

I first heard about Northern State - 3 white female rappers, when Anne
got her Oberlin Alumni magazine in the mail a couple of years ago.
One of these young hags is an Obie, wan though she is.

I couldn't believe that these smart people I looked up to could
somehow think that mentioning Chekov in a rhyme that goes like this...

The country's getting ugly and there's more in store
But don't blame me 'cause I voted for Gore
Keep choice legal
And your wardrobe regal
Chekov wrote "The Seagull"
Snoopy is a beagle

... is the same as being literate. but they raved on and on, and the
world has joined them:

The ladies of Northern State fight for their right to party like three
Beastie Girls with liberal arts degrees from good schools and the
smarts to keep it real...
writing sharp-tongued lyrics ...
intellectual messages with pop-culture commentary...
smashingly brilliant...
hilariously deft rhyming skills...

Sprout (one of the three vapid rappers) shows herself to be at least
as smart as a bean or alphapha seed that's been soaked overnight -
says this about her influences: "Joni Mitchell, Ani DiFranco, female
musicians who have done important and very powerful things with
words—something that we do."

Uh huh. She knows what they are doing, that's for sure.

Here's some important and powerful things from Northern State:

I'm free balling,

yeah, I'm free falling,

my cellie blowin' up from the numbers that I'm calling,

go from 9 to 5, then from 5 to 9

I got DJ Sprout on the line

In my other ear I got Hesta Pyrnn and you know that little girl be
wheelin' and dealin'

Prynn up all night tryin to work the plane, me and Sprout stuck again
in a traffic jam

We do it how we do it and we don't need permission, we like it how we rock it

Intuition in our pocket, so please and thank you and don't apgolize

I'm saying what I'm saying looking you right in the eyes, you're dying
in stereo.

There's nothing to left to sy and everything I knew, I knew yesterday,
what's a girl like me supposed to do? get on the mic you know you want
to

what's a girl like me supposed to sy? I'm on the mic cause I like it that way.

It's like you're dying in stereo, can't believe my ears, every single
night, I cast you out, you're serving me capers and you're serving me
papers, and I'm feeling kinda high off of your poisonous vapors, you
can't trash what you don't understand. You can make requests buy you
can't make demands. I'm proud of what I'm doing so don't criticize me.

I knew you all along and you didn' t ever surprise me. I cast you out
and then I cast you in, put that on your tables and spin, in your
mouth or in your hand, the name is not Eminem. The name is Hesta
Prynn, I'm timeless. I write while I rhyme this, turn down the sound
and I'll mime this.

Edmund Hillary couldn't climb this, parsley sage rosemary and thyme
this, step off, your flow is weak, save that talk for Dawson's Creek,
and if you wanna know why I shriek like a banshee? I'm seven eighths
white, one eighth Comanche. What's a girl like me supposed to do? One
step and then another and we're going with the flow, tomorrow and
tomorrow and tomorrow, we learn from the rhythm. We take what we're
given, we do whow we do and that's how we're living. It's like you're
dying in stereo, can't believe my ears, every single night, I cast you
out, my book is full of business and short on rhymes, I'm afraid to
even look at the New York Times, gonna wash my hands off the whole
affair, open the window and breathe the fresh air. I'm tired in a way
that I can't explain, can't remember the last time I felt the rain, I
write in the dark because I don't need to see, I'm not following the
moon - you know it's following me, keep my lips together and my teetha
part, be your substitute teacher write my rhymes on a chart, we're
ready every single night to take the stage and play. I don't have a
job but I work all day. Northern State put the cart before the horse,
we be who we are and show no remorse. What's a girl like me supposed
to do? It's like you're dying in stereo..

Thursday, March 17, 2005

more evidence

Today was my half-brother's 62nd birthday. My wife and I went and got
the cake my mother ordered for him. As we were checking out, my wife
looked at the receipt. She noticed that it say "Happy Birthy, Cary."

"I hope that they didn't put that on the cake," she joked.

So I looked, and sure enough, on the cake it said "Happy Birthy, Cary."

There was no time to take it back. So we just paid for it and as we
drove back, we marveled that somebody could see that and not say to
themselves "this can't be right, I better ask for clarification."

No, they just wrote it just as it was written.

Proof that people are half as smart every 18 months.

However, tragically, nobody here (not my half-brother, or his wife or
2 kids or their spouces or their children, or my brother and his kid)
noticed. We tipped my folks off, but the four of us kept our mouths
shut, and nobody else noticed at all.

even my own family, a fraction as intelligent as they used to be.

Tuesday, March 15, 2005

Robert Blake's Relatives In The News

I'm visiting my folks, and been enduring a lot of toxic TV. I saw one
interesting program about that asshole in Arizona, the self proclaimed
toughest lawman in America, totally entrapped some poor young schmuck
in order to more of the publicity that he craves – you've probably
heard of him – Sheriff Joe Blake. It's interesting how consistent it
is – that the people that are the most gung ho about law and order
have the least respect for it. The sheriff of Thurston County ( where
I lived up until a few months ago), Sheriff Gary Blake, shot a fleeing
suspect in the back, killing him – while he was taking a county
commissioner, a woman he was having an affair with, out with him in
his squad car, showing her how sheriff's work is done – at 2:00 am.
Everybody knew it, but they keep electing the guy, just like his
cousin Joe Blake in Arizona. I've never understood the lust common
people have for a total disregard for the American way on the part of
elected officials.

It's interesting too how much the American people love pretenders.
Blake's acting cousin, Sylvester Blake, made movies about a Vietnam
Vet, Ramberetto, but he spent the Vietnam war teaching phys ed in a
girls school, in one of the French speaking countries as I recall. I
recall a discussion I had over at the anti-bizarro-ultrazine list
where people insisted that John Blake (another actor cousin, who won
an academy award for playing another sheriff, Rooster Cogramberetto)
was a great American hero, despite the fact that he ducked out of
World War 2 (as did Ronald Blake, who showed amazing acts of courage
like calling the state police out on some hippy protesters – an act no
doubt applauded by people who regard hippies, not state violence, as
the 60s gravest threat to democracy). I pointed out that unlike the
Blake cousins, Jimmy Steward actually went to war and faced danger.
They missed the chance to hail him as a great conservative, and
instead used the opportunity to say that the path was made easy for
him as a reservist. Something that could you exiled into social and
political cyberia if you said it about current draft dodging president
George W Blake.

In fact, out of all the presidential candidates of the last four
decades, the one served the most valorously was tarred with the brush
of being a wimp (sound familiar?) I'm referring, of course, to George
McGovern. He was trampled by Richard M Blake, who spent his service
years working on his poker game. By tarring McGovern with the brush of
wimpiness, dirty tricks, and appeals to law and order, the lawless
Richard M Blake won handily, because the American people cannot get
enough of lawlessness wrapped in a flag.

One of the anti-bizarro-ultraziners also, astonishingly, paraphrased
current vice president Dick Blake's comments about "having better
things to do" than serve in the military – send the dupes and suckers,
and let them live in a box on the street after you get what you want
from them. Send Potis Blake over with a plastic turkey and a camera
crew, and the rubes will eat it up, and wrap themselves in the same
flag he soils.

Even if there are only three of us here, thank Courtney Love that we
have more highly evolved skepticism systems than those star belly
Blakes over there on the other side.

Jeez

I'm still at my folk's place. My nephew is sort of like Tarzan...
except instead of raised by great apes, he was raised by various
electronic appliances. He kept communing with mother TV, 24/7, on a
station that was broadcasting Jim Carrey movies, one after another,
around the clock. saw Ace Ventura call of the wild yesterday? No
problem, watch it again today.

I have to say, after all that exposure, I'm certain that Carrey is one
of the least funny people on the planet. The movies - The Mask -
twice - Ace Ventura and the sequel - twice - Dumb and Dumber - twice -
are grotesque insults not only to the intelligence, but the qualities
that make us human, in general. Really appalling crap.

Interestingly, when they said the Truman Show was coming up, my
sister-in-law said "I hated that movie." When my wife asked mildly,
"why?" she back-peddled immediately. "Oh, I guess as a movie it
wasn't bad... it was alright. But it was affecting."

Ah. There's the problem. It makes you feel. It reminds you that you
are human, not just a bag of sugar and alchohol sucking protoplasm. I
can kind of halfways relate to that - I like movies that let me
escape. I don't want a heavy message dumped on my head in a movie, the
world is a tough enough place as it is. But for gods sake, don't dump
a bag of shit on my head and call it april showers, as is the case
with most of Carrey's movies.

The Spotless Mind was good too. but the asshole wasn't trying to be
funny in that one, either.

Monday, March 14, 2005

The CIA's Campus Spies

This article is from the www.counterpunch.org webpage. Dr David Price
is an old friend of mine. I have tremendous respect for his
scholarship. He's doing bang up work in anthropology and in the study
of the compromise of academia through covert government action (I
don't know what the name of that particular academic discipline would
be).

The history of the the U of W in this regard is interesting and
shameful (see his book "Threatening Anthropology: McCarthyism and the
FBI's Surveillance of Activist Anthropologists" available at the U
bookstore.

It might be interesting to use our information seeking expertise to
try to learn how (and if) the U is involved in the latest wave of this
insidious practice.

Weekend Edition
March 12 / 13, 2005
*** A CounterPunch Special Investigation ***
Exposing the Pat Roberts Intelligence Scholars Program
The CIA's Campus Spies
By DAVID H. PRICE
The secrecy surrounding the current use of university classrooms as
covert training grounds for the CIA and other agencies now threatens
the fundamental principles of academic openness as well as the
integrity of a wide array of academic disciplines. A new test program
that is secretly placing CIA agents in American university classrooms
for now operates without detection or protest,. With time these
students who cannot admit to their true intentions will inevitably
pollute and discredit the universities in which they are now enrolled.
There have long been tensions between the needs of academia and the
needs of the National Security State, and even before the events of
9/11 expanded the powers of American intelligence agencies, our
universities were quietly being modified to serve the needs of the
intelligence community in new and covert ways. The most visible of
these reforms was the establishment of the National Security Education
Program (NSEP) which siphoned-off students from traditional foreign
language funding programs such as Fulbright or Title VI. While
traditional funding sources provide students with small stipends of a
few thousand dollars to study foreign languages in American
universities, the NSEP gives graduate students a wealth of funds (at
times exceeding $40,000 a year) to study "in demand" languages, but
with troubling pay-back stipulations mandating that recipients later
work for unspecified U.S. national security agencies. Upon its debut
in the early 1990s, the NSEP was harshly criticized for reaching
through an assumed barrier between the desires of academia and state.
Numerous academic organizations, including, the Middle East Studies
Association and the African Studies Association, Latin American
Studies Association, and even the mainstream Boards of the Social
Science Research Council and American Council of Learned Societies
expressed deep concerns over scholars' participation in the NSEP. And
though the NSEP continues funding students despite these protests,
there was some solace in knowing so many diverse academic
organizations condemned this program.
But while many academics reacted with anger and protest to the NSEP's
entrance onto American campuses, there has been no public reaction to
an even more troubling post-9/11 funding program which upgrades the
existing American intelligence-university-interface. With little
notice Congress approved section 318 of the 2004 Intelligence
Authorization Act which appropriated four million dollars to fund a
pilot program known as the Pat Roberts Intelligence Scholars Program
(PRISP). Named after Senator Pat Roberts (R. Kansas, Chair, Senate
Select Committee on Intelligence), PRISP was designed to train
intelligence operatives and analysts in American university classrooms
for careers in the CIA and other agencies. PRISP now operates on an
undisclosed number of American college and university campuses, and if
the pilot phase of the program proves to be a useful means of
recruiting and training members of the intelligence community then the
program will expand to more campuses across the country.
Currently, PRISP participants must be American citizens who are
enrolled fulltime in graduate degree programs with a minimum GPA of
3.4, they need to "complete at least one summer internship at CIA or
other agencies," and they must pass the same background investigations
as other CIA employees. PRISP students receive financial stipends
ranging up to $25,000 per year and they are required to participate in
closed meetings with other PRISP scholars and individuals from their
administering intelligence agency.
Less than 150 students a year are now authorized to receive funding
during the pilot phase as PRISP evaluates the program's initial
outcomes. Beyond a few articles in a Kansas newspaper praising Senator
Roberts, as well as University of Kansas anthropologist Felix Moos'
role in lobbying for the PRISP, there has been a general media silence
regarding the program. The few guarded public statements issued
describing PRISP stress supposed similarities between existing ROTC
programs and the PRISP. For example, the Lawrence Journal World
(11/29/03) published claims that, "Those in the program would be part
of the ROTC program specializing in learning how to analyze a variety
of conditions and activities based on a thorough understanding and
deep knowledge of particular areas of the world." Beyond the similar
requirements that participants of both programs commit to years of
service to their sponsoring military or intelligence branches there
are few similarities between ROTC and PRISP. ROTC programs mostly
operate in the open, as student-ROTC members register for ROTC courses
and are proudly and visibly identified as members of the ROTC program,
while PRISP students are instructed to keep their PRISP-affiliations
hidden from others on campus.
PRISP is an open secret, and the CIA apparently prefers that it stay
more secret than open-as the CIA's website does not maintain an active
link with detailed information on PRISP. Currently PRISP limits its
advertising to intelligence recruiting web sights (such as
www.intelligencecareers.com or the National Ground Intelligence
Center) and to small, controlled recruiting sessions. PRISP recruits
scholars with "advanced area expertise in China, Middle East, Korea,
Central Asia, the Caucasus," with a special emphasis given to scholars
with previous linguistic expertise in "Chinese, Arabic, Persian, Urdu,
Pashtun, Dari, Korean, or a Central Asian or Caucasian language such
as Georgian, Turkmen, Tajik, or Uzbek." PRISP also funds Islamic
studies scholars and scientists with expertise in bioterrorism,
counterterrorism, chemistry, physics, computer science and
engineering.
Inquiries made to Senator Roberts' staff concerning the current size
and scope of PRISP yielded little useful information and Roberts'
staff referred me to Mr. Tommy Glakas at the CIA. Mr. Glakas was
reluctant to discuss many specific details of PRISP, but he did
confirm that PRISP now funds about 100 students who are studying at an
undisclosed number of American universities. When asked if PRISP was
up and running on college campuses Glakas first answered that it was,
then said it wasn't, then clarified that PRISP wasn't the sort of
program that was tied to university campuses-it was decentralized and
tied to students, not campuses. When pressed further on what this
meant Mr. Glakas gave no further information. He said that he had no
way of knowing exactly how many universities currently have students
participating in PRISP, claiming he could not know this because PRISP
is administered not just by the CIA, but also through a variety of
individual intelligence agencies like the NSA, MID, or Naval
Intelligence. He stressed that PRISP was a decentralized scholarship
program which funds students through a various intelligence agencies.
Mr. Glakas said he didn't know who might know how many campuses had
PRISP scholars and he would not identify which campuses are hosting
these covert PRISP scholars.
The Intelligence Scholars Program did not spring forth out of a
vacuum. Like the Patriot Act, the germs of PRISP were conceived years
ago and were waiting for the right rendez-vous of fear with
opportunity to be born. PRISP is largely the brainchild of University
of Kansas anthropologist Felix Moos-a longtime advocate of
anthropological contacts with military and intelligence agencies.
During the Vietnam War Moos worked in Laos and Thailand on World
Bank-financed projects and over the years he has worked in various
military advisory positions. He worked on the Pentagon's ARPA Project
Themis, and has been as an instructor at the Naval War College and at
the U.S. Staff and Command College at Fort Leavenworth. For years Moos
has taught courses on "Violence and Terrorism" at the University of
Kansas. In the months after the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center
and Pentagon Moos elicited the support of his friend, former CIA DCI,
Stansfield Turner to curry support in the senate and CIA to fund his
vision of a merger between anthropology, academia, intelligence
analysis and espionage training.
Professor Moos initially proposed that all PRISP students be required
to master two foreign languages and use anthropology and history
classes to learn the culture history of the regions they are studying.
Moos's vision for PRISP was more comprehensive than the current pilot
program and it included classes on topics such as bioterrorism and
counterterrorism. Moos proposed having an active CIA campus presence
where PRISP students would begin training as freshmen and, "by the
time they would be commissioned, they would be ready to go to the
branch intelligence units of their choice." If the pilot phase of
PRISP goes well, this may be the direction in which this program
develops-though it is doubtful that PRISP would expand in any way
which openly identified participants.
It is tempting to describe Moos as an anachronistic anthropologist out
of sync with his discipline's mainstream, but while many
anthropologists express concerns about disciplinary ties to military
and intelligence organizations, contemporary anthropology has no core
with which to either sync or collide and there are others in the field
who openly (and quietly) support such developments. Moos is a bright
man, but his writings echo the musty tone and sentiments found in the
limited bedside readings of Tom-Clancy-literate-colonials, as he
prefers to quote from the wisdom of Sun Tzu and Samuel Huntington over
anthropologists like Franz Boas or Laura Nader. Two years ago at an
interesting and confrontational panel examining anthropological
connections to intelligence agencies at the annual American
Anthropological Association (AAA) meetings, I watched an angry Moos
strike an action pose and rhetorically ask, "Have anthropologists
learned so little since 9/11/2001, as to not recognize the truth-and
practicability, in Sun Tzu's reminder that: 'unless someone is subtle
and perspicacious, he cannot perceive the substance in intelligence
reports. It is subtle, subtle." From the dais I could see not so
subtle anthropologists in the audience employed by Rand and the
Pentagon nodding their heads as if his words had hit a secret chord.
Moos was clearly onto something.
Felix Moos' notion of scholar-spies in part draws upon an imagined
romantic history of anthropologists' contributions to the Second World
War, which, while this is a widespread notion, it is one increasingly
undermined by FOIA and archival-based historical research of the
complexities (both ethical and practical) of anthropologists plying
their trade in even this "good" war. Back in 1995 Moos testified
before a commission modifying the AAA's code on anthropological ethics
that anthropologists should be allowed to engage in secretive
research, arguing that, "In a world where weapons of mass destruction
have become so terrible and terrorist actions so frightful,
anthropologists must surrender naïve faith in a communitarian utopia
and be prepared to encounter conflict and violence. Indeed they should
feel the professional obligation to work in areas of ethnic
conflict.But, as moral creatures so engaged, they would of course have
to recognize the necessity of classifying some of their data, if for
no other reason than to protect the lives of their subjects and
themselves."
It is this devotion to secrecy that is the root problem of the PRSIP's
presence on our campuses as well as with Moos' vision of anthropology
harnessed for the needs of state. Moos' fallacy is his belief that the
fundamental problem with American intelligence agencies is that they
are lacking adequate cultural understanding of those they study, and
spy upon-this fallacy is exacerbated by orthodox assumptions that good
intelligence operates best in realms of secrecy. America needs good
intelligence, but the most useful and important intelligence can
largely be gathered openly without the sort of covert invasion of our
campuses that PRISP silently brings.
The claim that more open source, non-classified intelligence is what
is needed is less far fetched than it might seem. In Cloak and Gown:
Scholars in the Secret War, 1939-1961 historian Robin Winks recounts
how in 1951, the CIA's Sherwood Kent conducted an experiment in which
a handful of Yale historians used nothing but declassified materials
in Yale's library to challenge CIA analysts (with access to classified
data) to produce competing reports on U.S. military capacities,
strengths and weaknesses focusing on a scale of detail down to the
level of military divisions. This written evaluation of this contest
was known as the "Yale Report," which concluded that over 90% of
material in the CIA's report was found in the Yale library. Kent
further estimated that of the remaining 10% of "secret" materials,
only half of this could be expected to remain secret for any length of
time. President Truman was so furious with the results of the Yale
Report that he suppressed its distribution, arguing that the press
needed more restrictions governing the release of such sensitive
materials, while Republican pundits joined the furor claiming that
Yale liberals were trying to leak state secrets.
Evidence of the power of open intelligence is close at hand, consider
only how American scholars' (using publicly available sources)
analysis of the dangers for post-invasion Iraq out-performed the CIA's
best estimates. As one who has lived in the Middle East and read
Arabic news dailies online for years while watching the expansion of
American policies that appear to misread the Arab world I wonder if a
repeat of the Yale Report experiment focusing on the Middle East might
not find another 10% intelligence gap, but with the academy now
winning due to the deleterious effects of generations of CIA
intellectual inbreeding. Perhaps the Agency has become self-aware of
these limits brought on by the internal reproduction of its own
limited institutional culture, and in its own misshapen view it sees
PRISP as a means of supplying itself with new blood to rejuvenate
under cover provided by public classrooms. But such secrecy-based
reforms are the products of a damaged institutional mind trying to
repair itself.
Some might misread my criticism of the CIA's secret presence on our
campuses as contradicting my critique of the need for more outside and
dissenting (even informed hairbrained dissenting) input in
intelligence circles, but such a reading would misunderstand the
importance of openness in academic and political processes. The
fundamental problems with American intelligence are exacerbated by
secrecy-when intelligence agencies are allowed to classify and hide
their assumptions, reports and analysis from public view they generate
self-referential narrow visions that coalesce rather than challenge
top-down policies from the administrations they serve. Intelligence
agencies do need to understand the complex cultures they study, but to
suggest that intelligence agencies like the CIA are simply amassing
and interpreting political and cultural information is a dangerous
fantasy: The CIA fulfills a tripartite role of gathering intelligence,
interpreting intelligence, and working as a supraconstitutional covert
arm of the presidency. It is this final role that should give scholars
and citizens pause when considering how PRSIP and other
university-intelligence-linked programs will use the knowledge they
take from our open classrooms.
The CIA makes sure we won't know which classrooms PRSIP scholars
attend, this is rationalized as a requirement for protecting the
identities of intelligence personnel. But this secrecy shapes PRISP as
it takes on the form like a cell-based covert operation in which PRISP
students study chemistry, biology, sociology, psychology, anthropology
and foreign languages without their fellow classmates, professors,
advisors, department chairs or presumably even research subjects
(creating serious ethics problems under any post-Nuremberg
professional ethics code or Human Subject Review Board) knowing that
they are working for the CIA, DIA, NSA or other intelligence agencies.
In a decade and a half of Freedom of Information Act research I have
read too many FBI reports of students detailing the deviant political
views of their professors (These range from the hilarious: As
anthropologist Norman Humphrey was reported to have called President
Eisenhower a "duckbilled nincompoop"; to the Dadaist: Wherein former
Miss America, Marilyn van Derbur, reported that sociologist Howard
Higman mocked J. Edgar Hoover in class; to the chilling: As when the
FBI arranged for a graduate student to guide topics of "informal"
conversation with anthropologist Gene Weltfish that were later the
focus an inquiry by Joseph McCarthy) to not mention the certainty that
these PRSIP students are also secretly compiling dossiers on their
professors and fellow students. Of course I would be remiss to not
mention that students are the only ones sneaking the CIA onto our
campuses. There are also unknown thousands of university professors
who periodically work with and for the CIA--in 1988 CIA spokeswoman
Sharon Foster bragged that the CIA then secretly employed enough
university professors "to staff a large university." Most experts
estimate that this presence has grown since 2001.
The quiet rise of programs like PRISP should not surprise anyone given
the steady cuts in federal funding for higher education, and the
resulting pressures for more mercenary roles for the academy. In the
post-World War Two decades, scholars naively self-recruited themselves
or followed classmates to the CIA, but increasingly those of us who
have studied the languages, culture and histories of peoples around
the world have also learned about the role of the CIA in undermining
the autonomy of those cultures we study, and the steady construction
of this history has hurt the agency's efforts to recruit the best and
brightest of post-graduates. For decades the students studying Arabic,
Urdu, Basque or Farsi were predominantly curious admirers of the
cultures and languages they studied, the current shift now finds a
visible increase in students whose studies are driven by the market
forces of Bush's War on Terrorism. If the CIA can use PRISP to
indenture students in the early days of their graduate
training-supplemented with mandated summer camp internships immersed
in the workplace ethos of CIA-the company can mold their ideological
inclinations even before their grasp of cultural history is shaped in
the relatively open environment of their university. As these PRISP
graduates enter the CIA's institutional environment of
self-reinforcing Group Think they will present a reduced risk of
creating cognitive dissonance by bringing new views that threaten the
agency's narrow view of the world. Institutional Group Think can thus
safely be protected from external infection.
But while PRISP protects and intensifies the inbred-limited-thinking
at CIA and elsewhere, it threatens the academic integrity of
anthropology and other academic disciplines that unwittingly become
complicit partners with these intelligence agencies. The CIA has long
recognized that anthropology, with its broadly traveled and culturally
and linguistically competent practitioners has highly useful skill
sets. And while we should not read too much into published reports
that the CIA-directed torture techniques at Abu Ghraib were fine-tuned
for high levels of culturally specific humiliation by the reading of
anthropologist Raphael Patai's book The Arab Mind (Patai's scholarship
is stained with Orientalist stereotypes and it doesn't take an
insider's knowledge that Arabs generally abhor dogs and sexual
humiliation to presume that tormenting bound naked men with vicious
dogs would be an effective means of torture), anthropologists have
long had their work pilfered by American intelligence agencies. To
cite but two documented examples, in 1951, the CIA cut a covert deal
with the AAA's executive board providing the CIA access to data on
anthropologists' cultural and linguistic specialties as the CIA
secretly produced a roster of AAA members for the AAA on the CIA's
computers; and, in 1962 the U.S. Department of Commerce illegally
translated Georges Condominas' ethnography, We Have Eaten the Forest
on highland Vietnamese Montagnards for use as a counterinsurgency
tool. Though no scholar can control the uses of information they make
public, there does need to be an awareness of how any knowledge can be
abused by others--and as awareness of the presence of PRISP spreads,
many scholars may find themselves engaging in new forms of
self-censorship and doublethink.
Healthy academic environments need openness because they (unlike the
CIA) are nourished by the self-corrective features of open
disagreement, dissent, and synthetic-reformulation. The presence of
the PRISP's secret sharers brings hidden agendas that sabotage these
fundamental processes of academia. The Pat Roberts Intelligence
Scholars Program infects all of academia with a germ of dishonesty and
distrust as participant scholars cloak their intentions and their ties
to the cloaked masters they serve.

David Price teaches anthropology at St. Martin's College in Olympia,
Washington. His latest book, Threatening Anthropology: McCarthyism and
the FBI's Surveillance of Activist Anthropologists has just been
published by Duke University Press. His Atlas of World Cultures has
just been republished by the Blackburn Press. He can be reached at:
dprice@stmartin.edu

imbd

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Matt Love
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:52:32 -0800
Subject: imbd
To: bizarro_ultrazine@yahoogroups.com

How can you guys say you hate the internet movie database? Oh, I know
why Klaus said it - because they ultimately agreed with my
(overwhelming evidence) and agreed that Plan 10 From Outer Space and
Shakespeare's Plan 12 From Outer Space are different movies.

That episode caused Klaus to lose a $60,000 bet to me. I invested
the money into my own armpit porn empire, and was doing really well
until President Ronald Wilson Blake appointed Mickey Meese to head an
armpit porn commission. even though they found that armpit porn
increases longevity and brightens your teeth, they suppressed the
findings and put out a bogus report that says that armpit porn causes
blindness. I was ruined.

But anyway, I don't know what Tim's beef is. Does that other outfit
you were talking about provide great services, like listing the bottom
100 movies of all time?

A fascinating mix of cult classics and recent mainstream releases like
"From Justin To Kelly."

100 is Dumber and Dumberer. The original really should be in the
bottom 100 also, I can't figure how people can decide "Dumb and
Dumber" is a good movie, and "Mystery Men" is a bad movie. Oh, yeah,
maybe they would have gotten it right 18 months ago.

IMDb Bottom 100
Rank Rating Title Votes
1. 1.6 'Manos' the Hands of Fate (1966)
7,527
2. 1.7 From Justin to Kelly (2003) 6,897
3. 1.7 Future War (1997)
1,505
4. 1.7 Tangents (1994)
663
5. 1.8 Space Mutiny (1988)
1,720
6. 1.8 Girl in Gold Boots (1969) 834
7. 1.8 Troll 2 (1990)
1,829
8. 1.8 Hobgoblins (1987)
1,932
9. 1.8 Eegah (1962)
1,225
10. 1.9 Son of the Mask (2005) 1,214
11. 1.9 You Got Served (2004) 6,362
12. 1.9 Santa with Muscles (1996) 2,530
13. 1.9 Backyard Dogs (2000) 1,241
14. 1.9 Ator l'invincibile 2 (1984) 658
15. 2.0 Night Train to Mundo Fine (1966)
1,025
16. 2.0 SuperBabies: Baby Geniuses 2 (2004)
2,104
17. 2.0 Daniel - Der Zauberer (2004)
2,549
18. 2.0 The Wild World of Batwoman (1966)
1,085
19. 2.0 Alone in the Dark (2005) 1,962
20. 2.0 Glitter (2001)
5,762
21. 2.0 Werewolf (1996)
973
22. 2.0 Going Overboard (1989) 1,281
23. 2.1 Nuevos extraterrestres, Los (1983) 1,043
24. 2.1 Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie (1997) 1,212
25. 2.2 Uomo puma, L' (1980) 855
26. 2.2 Police Academy: Mission to Moscow (1994) 5,173
27. 2.2 Gigli (2003)
11,531
28. 2.2 3 Ninjas: High Noon at Mega Mountain (1998) 670
29. 2.3 Kazaam (1996)
3,334
30. 2.3 Santa Claus Conquers the Martians (1964)
1,810
31. 2.3 The Giant Spider Invasion (1975)
894
32. 2.3 Stjerner uden hjerner (1997)
936
33. 2.3 House of the Dead (2003) 3,600
34. 2.3 Leonard Part 6 (1987) 2,128
35. 2.4 Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000 (2000)
15,323
36. 2.4 Lawnmower Man 2: Beyond Cyberspace (1996) 2,239
37. 2.4 Robot Monster (1953) 688
38. 2.4 Baby Geniuses (1999) 3,029
39. 2.5 It's Pat (1994)
2,549
40. 2.5 Cool as Ice (1991)
1,229
41. 2.5 Hercules in New York (1970)
2,532
42. 2.5 2001: A Space Travesty (2000)
1,923
43. 2.5 Jaws: The Revenge (1987) 5,913
44. 2.6 Dis - en historie om kjærlighet (1995)
709
45. 2.6 Bolero (1984)
1,264
46. 2.6 Simon Sez (1999)
698
47. 2.6 The Return of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1994)
2,519
48. 2.7 Police Academy 6: City Under Siege (1989) 4,967
49. 2.7 Mitchell (1975)
1,214
50. 2.7 Rollerball (2002)
5,927
51. 2.7 Steel (1997)
1,532
52. 2.7 Marci X (2003)
672
53. 2.7 Vercingétorix (2001)
1,414
54. 2.7 Teen Wolf Too (1987) 2,112
55. 2.7 Smokey and the Bandit Part 3 (1983)
1,384
56. 2.7 Shanghai Surprise (1986) 794
57. 2.8 The Master of Disguise (2002)
4,515
58. 2.8 Police Academy 5: Assignment: Miami Beach (1988)
5,685
59. 2.8 Captain America (1991) 1,318
60. 2.8 Piranha Part Two: The Spawning (1981) 703
61. 2.8 Mannequin: On the Move (1991)
1,189
62. 2.8 Ringmaster (1998)
1,444
63. 2.9 Bride of the Monster (1955) 820
64. 2.9 Spice World (1997)
8,221
65. 2.9 Tarzan, the Ape Man (1981) 1,212
66. 2.9 Mortal Kombat: Annihilation (1997)
6,354
67. 3.0 Rhinestone (1984)
882
68. 3.0 Street Fighter (1994)
7,791
69. 3.0 Problem Child 2 (1991) 3,419
70. 3.0 Plump Fiction (1997)
702
71. 3.0 Mr. Nanny (1993)
1,517
72. 3.0 Out for a Kill (2003)
749
73. 3.1 The Brain That Wouldn't Die (1962)
899
74. 3.1 Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie (1995)
2,113
75. 3.1 Double Dragon (1994) 1,423
76. 3.1 Barb Wire (1996)
5,855
77. 3.1 Torque (2004)
3,745
78. 3.1 The Smokers (2000)
646
79. 3.1 Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot (1992)
6,232
80. 3.1 Cop & 1/2 (1993)
1,591
81. 3.1 Son of the Pink Panther (1993)
656
82. 3.1 Crossroads (2002)
8,190
83. 3.1 RoboCop 3 (1993)
5,122
84. 3.1 An Alan Smithee Film: Burn Hollywood Burn (1997) 1,223
85. 3.2 Jaws 3-D (1983)
4,792
86. 3.2 The Foreigner (2003) 844
87. 3.2 Soul Plane (2004)
2,001
88. 3.2 Children of the Corn II: The Final Sacrifice (1993)
867
89. 3.2 The Mangler (1995)
1,178
90. 3.2 The Cat in the Hat (2003) 4,670
91. 3.2 FearDotCom (2002)
4,850
92. 3.2 Superman IV: The Quest for Peace (1987) 6,735
93. 3.2 Mac and Me (1988)
1,264
94. 3.2 Universal Soldier: The Return (1999)
3,343
95. 3.2 Cyborg 2 (1993)
669
96. 3.2 Silenzio dei prosciutti, Il (1994)
807
97. 3.2 Iron Eagle II (1988)
1,181
98. 3.3 Children of the Corn III (1995)
638
99. 3.3 Bats (1999/I)
2,933
100. 3.3 Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd (2003) 4,453
In order to appear in the Bottom 100 Titles chart the title must have
received at least 625 votes.

Sunday, March 13, 2005

Seeking Demographic Information About Harvard Students

Dear Sir or Ms

I hope this fine day finds you in good health. I am doing well. I'm
currently visiting my parents in their home in Wenatchee Washington.
My folks, despite one being in his 90s, and the other in her 80s, are
doing relatively well. They spend a good deal of their time watching
TV these days, which of course is their right; they have done their
part and now it is time for them to reap the rewards of a lifetime of
toil. If only the popular media paid them back better. I personally
have not owned a TV since I left this home in 1974. Therefore, it is
quite likely that I have an immature and incomplete understanding of
How Things Really Are, inferior to my peers who have spent a lifetime
suckling at the glass teat. This is why I am writing to you.

I saw an advertisement (during a presentation of the second
installment of the the Ace Ventura franchise, surely one of the
towering achievements of western civilization) for a movie called
"Legally Blonde." The announcer, speaking in a deep and also deeply
authoritative voice, informed me that the subject of the movie was
about to go to a place where no Blonde had gone before - Harvard.

This astonished me. While I have never actually set foot on Harvard
soil, my understanding is that it has been around a good long while.
Perhaps even longer than there have been a United States. Yet nobody
of the Nordic (or perhaps albino?) persuasion has ever been admitted
to Harvard? That would be astonishing indeed.

I have thought about this until my brain hurts. I am doubly
handicapped - in addition to being televisionally challenged, I did
grow up in Wenatchee, where at birth we are basically set loose in the
orchards to fend for ourselves, eating apples and being tended over by
cows in a desultory fashion. I have only ever known one person who
went to Harvard - my high school girlfriend Kate Duey. I hasten to add
that she did not grow up in Wenatchee, but rather just inexplicably
appeared among us one day, like Venus composing herself out of sea
foam - and later just as mysteriously departed from our midst.
Kate's hair is in fact dark. My current wife (I do try to upgrade
regularly) tells me that an N of 1 is not a large enough sample size
from which to draw a valid conclusion. Since she too grew up far from
the arsenic, nicotine and lead-poisoned soil of this quaint little
valley, (and has a doctorate in health systems research, a topic she
teaches on from time to tome) I defer to her on this one.

However, I still have the assurances of my television that no Blonde
set foot at Harvard before the subject of this documentary arrived
there. Rather than dilly-dallying around with this any further, I'm
writing directly to you for assistance. Please tell me the truth, I
can handle it.

SIncerely,

Matt Love

Wednesday, March 09, 2005

Robert Blake in the news again!!!!

US: Robert Blake fired on a vehicle that was approaching at high speed
Robert Blake attempted to warn the driver to stop by hand and arm
signals, flashing white lights, and firing warning shots
When the driver didn't stop, Robert Blake shot into the engine block

Sgrena: The driver had spoken twice to the embassy and to Italy that
we were on our way to the airport
We were less than a kilometre [from the airport]... when... I remember
there was shooting
The driver began screaming that we were Italian
We weren't going particularly fast given that type of situation

****

Now who are we supposed to believe - a wop, the result of a gene
splicing experiment between a Frenchman and a clove of garlic, who
"claims" to be a "journalist" - or a public information officer in the
service of an administration whos leader talks to God - and almost
uniquely among the human race, gets direct answers back?!?

Remember, next time you are out driving around in your SUV, honk at
random intervals to show support for Robert Blake! He's got a hard
job! I hear he's going to be going into Iran soon to promote
democracy there! I can't wait!

Hooray for Robert Blake!

Monday, March 07, 2005

Wow, this is old school...

This is too good. It's like the product music of old...

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 24 Today brings what the ages will hail as the most
mind-boggling Hot Tip in Last Days' history, courtesy of
worship-worthy Hot Tipper Cilantro. The scene: The Starbucks Licensed
Stores Awards ceremony, a celebratory/motivational leadership
conference, held this evening in the fourth-floor ballroom of the
Washington State Convention Center. "Boring stuff, as usual corporate
things go," writes our man Cilantro. But things took a turn for the
surreal when the emcee announced "something special for you
all--Jefferson Starbucks!" after which the hydraulic stage rotated to
reveal a pretend band comprised of the upper-management folk the
audience had heard speak earlier in the evening. "They were standing
in front of a huge American Bandstand-esque 45 single dangling in the
air," writes Cilantro. "And they all had on rock 'n' roll Halloween
costumes: pink glitter wigs, white fishnet shirts, fake leather pants,
as well as big fake instruments--a huge, oversized piñata guitar and
keyboards. It was like a living cake decoration." From this most
promising of plateaus, Jefferson Starbucks quickly ascended to the
heavens, lip-synching their way through a company-specific rewrite of
Jefferson Starship's "We Built This City," the 1985 anthem that made
fresh headlines last year by topping an international critics' poll of
the worst songs ever. But tonight, Starship's crap was Starbucks'
gold, as "We Built This City On Rock 'n' Roll" was reborn as "We Built
This Starbucks on Heart and Soul!" with lyrics rewritten to celebrate
the Starbucks way:

Knee-deep in the mocha/making coffee right
So many partners/working late at night
We just want to build here--IMDS, does it pass?
We call on development to complete the task!
Living the way of being,
In the Green Apron Book!
Don't you remember?
We built this Starbucks on heart and soul!

The rewrite even replicated the weird helicopter news report that
appears in the middle of the original: "I'm looking out over hundreds
of partners on another fantastic leadership conference and I'm seeing
a bunch of everyday heroes!" "I couldn't fucking believe it," writes
Cilantro. "The rest of the crowd was stunned, too. Eventually, the
emcee berated them--'Come on you guys! Dance! This is your band! This
is for you!'--and the crowd half-heartedly got up and just stood
there." (A moment of silence for the million silent deaths experienced
by the audience during the song's merciless four-minute-and-48-second
running time.) Best of all, before his departure, Cilantro was given
his very own copy of the inexhaustibly mind-blowing song, pressed onto
souvenir CDs and distributed with pride by Starbucks stars. Dear
Cilantro: Thank you for surviving and sharing. Humanity is forever in
your debt. Dear readers: To hear "We Built This Starbucks" in its
entirety, go to thestranger.com/specials/starbucks.php

Saturday, March 05, 2005

Re: one more

RE: Collecting versions of Iron Man...

not really... it's so stupifyingly easy with file sharing to scratch
an itch like that, you don't even have to try.

This might look like an obsession of mine, like collecting Plans From
Outer Space, or Revolution #9 covers... but it isn't.

I think my first was the Cardigans version which I found on the much
missed Napster, or possibly Bear Share.... I was looking for Lovefool,
didn't know what it was called (thought it was "love me love me" or
something like that) so I just searched on their whole catalog.

I thought it might be amusing, and it exceded my expectations. That
was the end of it until I decided that I wanted to share it with you
guys, looked on WinMX, and found an interesting variety of versions,
all of which were loathsome.

The Bad Plus version came from a CD I checked out from the library. I
had heard another one of their CDs, which I didn't like - but I'm
trying to figure out why the critics (and Joe Sibley) are going nuts.
They did a version of Teen Spirit on the other CD that was similar to
their approach to Iron Man.

I actually dislike all versions of Iron Man except the Cardigans, and
a version a seemingly retarded or mentally ill busker played on his
tuba outside the opera house in seattle as we left the "A Mighty Wind"
concert.

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 07:23:30 -0800, Hugh Beaumont
wrote:
> Bad Plus is about right. Obviously some very good musicians with
> little or no taste; or maybe they jsut decided to be all avant garde
> intentionally.
> Either way, it was either over my head or under it...
>
>
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 00:38:44 -0800, Matt Love wrote:
> > then off to bed.
> >
> > the bad plus are sort of the great white hope of jazz that is not
> > winton marsalis
> >
> > I find this kind of a difficult listen, but funny. I'm not sure if
> > they were trying to be funny, but whether they meant it to be funny or
> > not, that's what i got from it.
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: http://dir.salon.com/ent/music/feature/2000/06/07/eminem/index.html?pn=2

Toby Keith hid from me all last year. As you may know, I have a
standing challenge to him to engage in physical combat. I realize
that doesn't prove that I'm right, and he's wrong, but some things
just have to be settled by force. He's too fucked to listen to reason.

I'm going to start offering a substantial sum of money to anybody who
can arrange this confrontation. I was thinking about something in the
$5.00 to $10.00 range.

Why am I talking about this now? Because soon I am going to issue the
same challenge to little girlyboy Marshall Mathers, who isn't fit to
choke on the vomit of Jerry Mathers, incidentally.

He's a bully and a coward, and I don't care if he's right on Bush (I
have heard that he is, I don't really know) he still needs to have the
crap kicked out of him, and I'm just the guy to do it.

Shit, I'll take them both on at once.

But I won't kill them, I'm crystal clear on that point. That would be wrong.

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 07:27:11 -0800, Hugh Beaumont
wrote:
> Uhg! Why doesn't someone just shoot that mofo. Maybe 'puffy' will do
> it for us all - then take his own life after...
>
>
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:33:15 -0800, Matt Love wrote:
> > man, my white guy rap is so weak.... look at what the genius of the
> > form is up to:
> >
> > re: eminem
> >
> > The new record "may be among the most objectionable albums ever to
> > receive mainstream release, but that does not make it a bad album,"
> > Alona Wartofsky assured us in the Washington Post. "The new album from
> > Eminem is absolutely outrageous. And I mean that in the best possible
> > sense," cheered Neil McCormick in London's Daily Telegraph.
> >
> > 'Cuz if I ever stuck it to any singer in showbiz
> > It'd be Jennifer Lopez and Puffy you know this!
> > I'm sorry Puff, but I don't give a fuck if this chick was my own mother
> > I still fuck her with no rubber and cum inside her and have a son and
> > a new brother at the same time
> > -- "I'm Back"
> >
> > Time Out New York thought this incestuous, quasi-rape fantasy about
> > Jennifer Lopez was "sidesplitting." The Times of London agreed it was
> > "extremely funny." CDNow insisted, "The man is fearless." Why? Because
> > he has the courage to insult, among others, pop stars Puff Daddy, Will
> > Smith, Britney Spears and 'N Sync. Eminem also has things to say about
> > quadriplegic Christopher Reeve. Talk about picking fights you can't
> > possibly lose.
> >
> > ****
> >
> > man, that is fearless
> >
>

stumbled across your blog, a question about Ritual abuse in the UK

It does occur to me that this could be satire, since it was on the
same page as a lengthy fictional history of the Rolling Stones
discography, but am interested in learning more about this. Since
ritual murder and abuse in the US turned out to be a huge moral panic
with nothing at the core, I'm very curious about why you folks have so
many evil people over there. I mean, the christian leadership of my
country is the one that has secret torture camps for suspected
terrorists all over the world, but our satanists are a pretty placid
lot. You say that they are tearing apart communities where you are.
Why are they allowed to have so much power? The US doesn't really
care much about children, they really don't - but they don't allow
this to happen. Why does your government, your society allow this to
happen in Glasgow?

****

It's pathetically easy to be swayed by the effects which EVIL people
create. It's easy as a hipster to wear those stigmatising signs.
That'd be all very well were it not that this stuff DOES have a
real-world corrolory. A friend works for Glasgow City Social Services.
One of her ongoing, and miserable, tasks is to try and piece together
communities rent apart by ritual murder and ritual abuse, often
inflicted on children. These clearly articulate people aren't
listening to Girls Aloud. It's a real thing evil. Talking to my friend
Jonathon Selzer this weekend about Black Metal in Norway and the
attendant culture, in extremis murder. Note all these semi-hilarious
stories about old women in Wales being killed by "Vampires", that's
someone's Granny.

Friday, March 04, 2005

All in the best of taste

I'm studying up the worst comedies (per the reviewers on the IMDB) Did
you know that "Leprechaun: Back 2 tha Hood" which we saw a few minutes
of, was not only the 6th movie in the series, but the 2nd one that
takes place among the sepia race? wow. and it's better than the
other one, according to fans.

This is the worst comedy of them all, per 460 voters:
Board: Anus Magillicutty (2003)

Check out the extremely high level discussion of the film. These
people are - what do they call it - "early adapters" of stupidity.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
View: thread | flat | inline | nest
i think this anus is stink
by - ragin_asian47 (Fri Mar 5 2004 18:03:23 ) Ignore this User |
Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i rent this movie from my local video store and i do not think its
very good. i was to think that this movie was something different but
i am wrong. usual times i rent many movies with porno and i think this
movie was to be like that, but i was misstaken. this movie did have
plenty nudity but not porno. some funny things in it. its ok i guess.
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - HornySmeagol (Sat Mar 6 2004 00:37:51 ) Ignore this User |
Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oi! learn how to right you freak!

I like little girlsesss!
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - forh8male (Mon Feb 21 2005 13:57:27 ) Ignore this User | Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Oi! learn how to right you freak!"

Yes, just... don't learn how to WRONG... [rolls eyes]

"A racist is a man who believes in history, genetics, and his eyes!" -
Tom Anderson
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - Necrophag (Sat Mar 13 2004 16:24:33 ) Ignore this User | Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was a gay porn when I first saw the title. but I soon
realized it was just a cheesy independant flick. you rented it
thinking it was porn? you like gay stuff huh? yuck!
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - ragin_asian47 (Thu Mar 18 2004 22:39:53 ) Ignore this User |
Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
no i do not like porn with gays. i like porn with sex for the butt of
the woman. i enjoy buttman and other titles. this movie had very sexy
woman but was not porn. it was okay but not waht i am expecting. i do
like large breasted american women in this movie. i like this kind of
ting very lots.
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - Necrophag (Fri Mar 19 2004 12:08:42 ) Ignore this User | Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good Gawd!
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - SonofPam (Mon Mar 29 2004 23:11:59 ) Ignore this User | Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did you rent this crappola?
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - analmagoo (Mon Apr 5 2004 03:08:58 ) Ignore this User | Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
you have to go to a more mom n pop type a place. the big places like
blockbastard don't carry it.
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - hatebot (Tue Apr 6 2004 22:48:10 ) Ignore this User | Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
why don't you just buy it off its website?
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - ragin_asian47 (Wed Apr 7 2004 11:47:12 ) Ignore this User |
Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i rent this movie at my local store. i dont know if i can say teh name
but it is on clark and belmont streets in chicago near my home.
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - JanicePendelton (Tue May 11 2004 23:58:18 ) Ignore this User |
Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
why was this movie so short anyway?
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - mackhamill3 (Wed Jun 2 2004 03:57:22 ) Ignore this User | Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
you mean why was it sooooooooo long.
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - j-larsson (Sat Jun 12 2004 10:54:17 ) Ignore this User | Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anus isnt that a thing in the ass!??


Re: i think this anus is stink
by - GrungeLover (Thu Jun 17 2004 12:56:30 ) Ignore this User |
Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J-Larsson, you ARE a F*CKING MORON!

OI! OI!
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - ashton_kooter (Thu Jun 17 2004 18:54:33 ) Ignore this User |
Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So Grunge Lover, are you saying you actually liked this movie?
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - GrungeLover (Sat Jun 19 2004 17:43:42 ) Ignore this User |
Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, it was in response to: "anus isn't that a thing in the ass!".

OI! OI!
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - j-larsson (Sun Aug 8 2004 08:47:14 ) Ignore this User | Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You too!!!!
Re: i think this anus is stink
by - rbrennan_89-1 (Tue Oct 5 2004 16:10:36 ) Ignore this User |
Report Abuse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the most retarded Message board i have ever been to!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Back to the top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Home | Search | Now Playing | News | My Movies | Games | Boards | Help
| US Movie Showtimes | Top 250 | Register | Recommendations | Box
Office | Index | Trailers | IMDbPro.com - Free Trial | IMDb Publicity
Photos

Copyright © 1990-2005 Internet Movie Database Inc.
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
An company. Advertise on IMDb. License our content.

Fwd: Knucklehead - bustin rhymes and kickin it with a tasty groove

More people would know about the amazing aphrodisiac qualities of Alex
Carr's music if he wasn't so dang modest. Cami uses her list to promo
her music like mad, but Alex's list is given over to humanitarian
causes - helping men find their lost erections, finding dates for
losers who haven't been out with a girl for 7 years (oops, that was me
once! never mind!) and so on.

Well, if Alex is too modest, let me blow his horn (and only his horn,
that's where I draw the line) - the music of Alex Carr is fucking
awesome, it's better than trepanation, and it's easier to stop if you
decide you don't like it!

Go to www.alexcarr.org, you won't be sorry, for reals!

While you are online, you might as well got to
www.soundclick.com/knuckleheadus and check out some of my modest
offerings. I've been experimenting with the musical vernacular of
today's sepia (and would-be-sepia) Euterpian professors. I am
referring to rap, of course, or hip hop, or folk music with the melody
taken out and a lot of swear words inserted.

Though I am new to this genre, my output seems to be catching on in a
big way. Check out the numbers below. It's true that getting to 7,
000 or 8,000 on the charts doesn't seem like much of an achievement,
but you have to consider that means over 485,000 songs are below
these.

Pretty fly for a white guy!

http://www.soundclick.com/knuckleheadus

brand new - no ranking yet!
White Guy Rap edit song info pictures delete license
Status: Free mp3. Uploaded: 28 Feb 05
mp3 size is 5.25 MB
Genre: HipHop - Old School

Who Ya Callin A Ho? edit song info pictures delete license
Status: Free mp3. Uploaded: 15 Feb 05
mp3 size is 2.84 MB
Genre: HipHop - Battles/Disses
Highest charts position: # 10659 ( 494,802 songs currently listed in HipHop)
Highest charts position in subgenre: # 660 ( 15,144 songs currently
listed in HipHop > Battles/Disses)

Thug edit song info pictures delete license
Status: Free mp3. Uploaded: 10 Feb 05
mp3 size is 1.26 MB
Genre: HipHop - Old School
Highest charts position: # 7374 ( 494,802 songs currently listed in HipHop)
Highest charts position in subgenre: # 256 ( 3,773 songs currently
listed in HipHop > Old School)

Think Again edit song info pictures delete license
Status: Free mp3. Uploaded: 10 Feb 05
mp3 size is 2.76 MB
Genre: HipHop - Battles/Disses
Highest charts position: # 8718 ( 494,802 songs currently listed in HipHop)
Highest charts position in subgenre: # 543 ( 15,144 songs currently
listed in HipHop > Battles/Disses

Thursday, March 03, 2005

One more thought for tonight....

My review of Alex Carr in concert is now posted at my blog, "Can Yo'
ass Dig It?" at

http://mattlove1.blogspot.com/

I am proud to announce that this review has won a pestigious music
journalism award. The "This Is Like Something that Came Out Of Satan's
Butt" award.

Wednesday, March 02, 2005

Re: [Alex Carr] URU Phharmaccy

Look, Redd, I'm sure you're a nice guy and everything, and I don't
want to cause you problems. Everybody has to make a living, I
understand that. I just want to give you some friendly advice. You
have come to the wrong place. Nobody at the Alex Carr list has any
need for Viagra. At all. The fact is, all you have to do is listen
to Alex Carr music before the sex act, and you will be hard all night
long. Every time, all the time. What's more, it works the same on
women. When your date comes over, just invite her into the living
room, pour a couple of glasses of wine, and put Alex Carr on the
stereo. Soon she will be clawing at you like a rabid macaw.

If you don't believe me, just go to http://www.alexcarr.org/ and see
for yourself. As long as you follow the rules (don't operate any
heavy equipment while under the influence of Alex Carr's music, and a
couple of dozen other common sense practices) the Alex Carr
Organization will guaran-damn-tee you will have a red hot time or
double your money back.

You can't lose. Except your shirt on this Viagra business, you big silly.

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:51:28 -0500, Redd Bernard wrote:
>
>
> Hello, Visit our Amazing Online SH0P!
>
>
> NOW SPEC OFF Cia ls) Vi ra $200(120 pil itra $300(50 pil
> IAL ER: lis $300(150 pil ag ls) Lev ls)
> And MANY OTHER.
>
> With each purchase you get:
> Home delivery
> Total confidentiality
> FDAApproved
> Highest Quality
>
> Have a nice day.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> ________________________________
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alexcarr/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> alexcarr-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Fwd: Alex Carr Concert Review!

Hey, I'm really excited, Lisa Smith of Dangerbird
(http://www.dangerbird.net) asked me to review her show (I saw her
band play last Saturday night at the Tractor Tavern in Seattle - they
were really good) for local press. I told her I'm kind of out of touch
with the music scene these days, but you give me their e-mail address,
I'll send them something.

I didn't know anybody remembered my music journalism. I used to do
quite a bit of it - you may remember when Klaus Enterprises bought the
Banal Buyer's Guide, I sunk all my money into a new music magazine,
"The Vinyl Solution." I planned to go head to head, toe to toe with
Roll Them Bones and Spif, but I got my ass kicked, and my head handed
to me on a platter.

Anyway, before then I did a lot of writing - after that traumatic
event, I have only done one piece - she's pretty young, so she must
not remember me from the old days, she must have seen this one. It is
a damn fine clot of writing if ask me.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Matt Love
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:51:36 -0800
Subject: Alex Carr Concert Review!
To: alexcarr@yahoogroups.com

I was tremendously excited to learn that Alex Carr was making an
appearance in my hometown, in Wenatchee's own stately pleasure-dome,
"Rocky's Spuds and Suds." There was virtually no advance publicity - I
wouldn't have even known about it had I not received a call from my
old friend Joe Swordfish. Somebody should have posted it on the Alex
Carr list! I would have, but I was having computer problems.

My wife is in Edmonton lecturing, so I had to kennel the dogs, jump in
my car and drive like the proverbial bat. And I don't mean the blind
one, though I guess that fits too! Right after I passed through
Leavenworth, I got a flat tire, and of course the spare was flat too.
Just my luck, I had to drive the last 25 miles on the rim, which ended
up costing me plenty, but it was worth it! Alex put on the show of a
lifetime.

To my surprise, despite the lack of publicity, the place was packed.
Afterwards I thought about it and realized that I shouldn't have been
surprised, Alex has enough fans in every major city and every little
berg in the country that he can probably pack out a place everywhere
he goes.

I got there literally seconds before he took the stage – at first I
was in the back wedged in next to the bathrooms, but I managed to
squirm my way forward and by the 3rd or 4th song I had a pretty good
view.

He opened with the perennial crowd pleaser, "The Frog Responds." A
natural choice, the audience was seriously pumped by the epic sweep of
this powerful tune. Though he appeared solo (his crack backing band
was playing at the presidential inauguration, a gig that Alex refused
on principle – right on, Alex!) you hardly noticed, his performance
was so powerful, and his sequences were programmed with expert timing.

He kept the energy level up by segueing into his next tune, "Another
Rabbi for Nixon" without even a break to allow the grateful audience
the chance to applaud. He kept us off balance with a new arrangement,
all twittering birds and coked-up rhinos haunting all-night diners,
like a painting by Edward Hopper, only with seriously disturbed
wildlife.

When the song ended, he kept up the assault, immediately launching
into "Blowin' Chunks," as it turned out, the only song he did all
evening dating back to his tenure with the band that made him famous,
Motley Hoople. But nobody seemed to mind, his catalog as a solo
artist is so studded with extraordinary songs.

He attacked his keyboard with tender savagery – the delicately
filigreed harpsichord ornamentation was worthy of PDQ Bach. It was
like when you're driving down a highway of molten lava, and your
girlfriend says "I feel like having a plate of boiled gravel and a
side of lobster eggs," and then you see the golden arches through the
trees. Perfect!

At last he stopped long enough for the audience to give him a
thunderous ovation. He accepted it like the rock royalty that he is.

In a characteristically bold move, he performed the next song a
cappella, his strong lungs pumping out "Kim Fowley's Wet Dream" with
impeccable intonation. When Alex hit the upper registers, I can
guarantee that you'd be chilled to your spine, as were those of us
lucky enough to be there. Carr curled his voice around the song like
gift-wrap around a Christmas present. There wasn't a dry seat in the
house as he tenderly crooned the familiar lines, "A tornado, my
tomato, damn inscrutable, indisputable…"

He did an especially smashing job on his 2002 hit, "Plan 14 from Outer
Space." He captured the outer space ambiance by performing it in a
special tuning (14 notes to the octave), which he devised himself.
The 23/16 time it's in is so fiendishly complicated that he tangled up
the fingers of his left hand, and sprained his throat. Fortunately a
chiropractor in the standing-room-only audience sorted out his hand
and applied a splint to his throat, and he was able to finish his set.

Now that he had the audience eating out of his newly repaired hand,
(only occasionally having to slap the more rowdy members on the snout
with a rolled up newspaper) Carr moved on to play some material off
his latest, most exploratory album yet, "Danny Was An Ed."
Downshifting again, from the petal-to-the-metal attack he'd formulated
for the better part of an hour, he eased the clutch out, and slipped
into the tender love ballad, "Coat Hanger Abortion," as the keyboard
gently gibbered like a rabid chimpanzee, and drum machine he called
"Kevin in a box" – in homage of an all-to-easily replaced human
percussionist formerly on his payroll - chattering amiably like a
locomotive with square wheels.

I didn't catch the name of the next song – Alex, ever the innovator,
said that he had just written it, inspired by his tour of the Aplets
and Cotlets factory in Cashmere that very afternoon. You would have
thought he'd been playing it for years, so firm was his hand on the
pitchbend wheel. The song was structured as a titanic struggle playing
out in a tug of war between the bass notes in his left hand and the
drum machine. The evenly matched contest creates a tension that is
almost unbearable.

Suddenly, the tension is released as the drums get the upper hand,
cracking the rope like a whip, sending the bass sprawling into the
kitchen, smashing glasses and plates, falling to the floor and peeing
it's pants, laughing hysterically. Riotous good fun.

The genetically modified audience got a real treat when he launched
into the frankly sensual funk workout, "Bukkake Tsunami." Dorsal fins
were smacked lustily together as he laid down the supple groove, and
there were gasps of amazement when he tore into the koto solo like a
beagle into cheesecake. By the spazadelic conclusion the dance floor
was slick with bodily fluids.

Joy turned to dismay when he announced the evening's final number, but
just as quickly the mood of frivolity returned as he boldly assayed
into the prickly thicket of the sonic cactus patch known as "Dust
Monkeys." The highlight was the densely textured bridge, highly
reminiscent of an Alaska king crab swearing in Danish at a Chippewa
Indian feeding nickels into a parking meter. Hilarity ensued as the Indian's
squaw arrived, dragging a sack of prize-winning potatoes behind her.

All-too-soon the concert was over; many in the jubilant audience hit
the bar, while the faithful lined up for autographs and a moment or
two of banter with their savior. Again too soon, Alex went quietly
into that good night, his fans returning home fortified, the more
insatiable Carrheads returning to their garishly painted VW vans and
tie-died Volvos to caravan (Carr-avan?!) around the country behind
their messianic leader.

Don't miss Alex Carr when he comes to your town!