I've finally achieved consistency in my life. Any person of average or above intelligence can predict what I will say next with unerring accuracy. And what I say will always be wrong.

Friday, November 17, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: [SECULARHUMANIST] *? 2 ALL: THINK YOU'LL GET WHAT YOU WANT FOR CHRISTMAS?*

Well, if we create our own reality, i guess there are no worries about 655,000 Iraqis dead and counting. They wanted it that way, I guess.

I didn't, but my desire for freedom and dignity were over-powered by the desires of the Thanatos-loving Iraqis (and the philisophical imperative of B F Skinner).

Because I didn't love the Democrats enough, we had 8 years of Bush... homeland security, death and destruction in New Orleans... but that's OK, they wished that Hurricane on themselves with more power than I wished it back out to sea.

If you think I'm running this voodoo down, you're right.

On 11/17/06, UnegaUnutsiGule@webtv.net < UnegaUnutsiGule@webtv.net> wrote:

"The Power of Positive Thinking" is the real deal TucPhe. (the book
was in our home since the 60's) You create your own destiny. I
believe all things are possible. The Dems took control, right?

Sandy Lynn


__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
Yahoo! Photos

Share Your Photos

via email & mobile

Y! GeoCities

Be Interactive

Create a conver-

sation with blogs.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: Now the Hard Part Begins

Please show how much of a friend you are to me by putting impeachment back on the table, where it belongs.

Thank you,

Matt

On 11/15/06, Congressman John Conyers <info@johnconyers.com> wrote:
John Conyers for Congress
 

 
Now the Hard Part Begins

Dear Matt,

We did it!  We won at least 29 House seats and took the majority.  We won 6 Senate seats and took back the Senate too, not to mention 28 Governors and several more statehouses.  We had incredible turnout of Democratic voters across the country.  Thanks to you, we had a vigorous election protection program in place to fight those who would restrict our right to vote.  We ran a positive campaign on the issues that really matter to American voters.



ConyersBlog
Come to  my blog today and share your views with me.

  contribute


Forward this email to friends and family.

 

The past two years we have worked very hard to bring a new majority to Congress and to restore accountability in Washington.  We have fought together on issues such as the unanswered irregularities in the Ohio presidential election,  the scandal of the Downing Street Minutes, the shame of outing a CIA agent, and much more.  Together we proved that a number of dedicated online activists, working in conjunction with a single congressman, could become a force to be reckoned with.

Although we won back control of Congress, none of us should delude ourselves into thinking that running the legislative branch in a nation wracked by years of one party rule will be easy.  We need to put aside any thought of anger or payback.  Instead we need to focus on identifying and correcting abuses and pass legislation which serves the interests of the American people. 

We also need to recapture the White House in 2008 and maintain and expand our majorities in the Congress.  In order to achieve these goals we need to be totally united as a Party.  It is fine to debate and argue behind closed doors and among ourselves, but at the end of the day, we owe it to the American people to unite and lead.

Thus, in my opinion it serve's no one's interests but the Republicans for anyone, including my friend James Carville, to suggest dumping DNC Chairman Dean less than three days after the most sweeping Democratic Congressional victory in more than thirty years.  As many of you also know, I have agreed with Speaker-to-be Pelosi that impeachment is off the table.  Instead, we agree that oversight, accountability and checks and balances – which have been sorely lacking for the last six years – must occur.  I have nothing but respect for those who might disagree, but that is where I come out. 

Having devoted a considerable amount of time and attention to detailing the many abuses of the Bush Administration, I firmly believe that we have brought these matters to the attention of the American people and the mainstream media, and that their verdict was reflected in the elections on November 7.  I consider the now famous "basement hearings" and the issuance of my " Constitution in Crisis" Report to be among the watershed achievements of my more than forty years in Congress. 

I also remain committed to the seminal issue of election reform.  As one who held several hearings in the immediate aftermath of the Ohio debacle and went on to author " What Went Wrong in Ohio ," I believe more than ever that we need a paper trail on voting machines.  We also need to strengthen our laws to put an end to intimidation schemes, like the stealth robo-calls voters received before the election.  I intend to introduce legislation next Congress concerning these matters.

Additionally, none of us should underestimate the continued anger and vitriol of our political opponents, even after the election they are engaged in a permanent campaign to discredit Democrats and thwart our agenda of change.  You need to go no further than the November 9 editorial in the supposedly mainstream Investors Business Daily, which smeared not only me but my constituents, writing, "[Michigan congressman John] Conyers led the defense of Bill Clinton in last decade's impeachment hearings and is clearly out for blood. So are many of the constituents he serves."  Pejorative and prejudiced statements like this should have no place in our political discourse. 

I am hopeful that I will be selected as Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.  The Judiciary Committee is one of the most important committees in the House, and has jurisdiction over the Justice Department, the civil rights laws, criminal laws, the civil justice system, the courts, immigration laws, antitrust laws, patent and copyright laws, bankruptcy laws, administrative law, and Constitutional amendments.   If I am selected as Chair, I believe it will place us in a position to make real and meaningful changes for the good of the American people.

We remain in this together, and I continue to look forward to receiving your ideas, your support, and your advice in the coming months and years.

Your Friend,

John Conyers, Jr.

 

 
johnconyers.com 


Conyers for Congress
PO Box 17204
Alexandria, VA 22314

Forward this message to a friend
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, click here
Powered by NGP Software, Inc.

__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
Yahoo! Photos

Create your own

Photo Gifts

Y! GeoCities

Create a Blog

And tell the world

what you think.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

Thursday, November 09, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] I love TV and the commercials that make it possible

Google. knows what I like:  I enter "LG steam washer commercial"

and this was in the top 10 hits... but nobody had the answer!

Google Answers: Model/actress in LG washing machine commercialQ: Model/actress in LG washing machine commercial ( No Answer, 2 Comments ) ... the dress in to steam, removes it, puts in on and goes out for the evening. ...
answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=754230 - 9k - Cached - Similar pages



Subject: Model/actress in LG washing machine commercial
Category: Arts and Entertainment > Celebrities
Asked by: wrennie-ga
List Price: $5.00
Posted: 09 Aug 2006 07:12 PDT
Expires: 08 Sep 2006 07:12 PDT
Question ID: 754230
I'm trying to find the identity of the model/actress in the recent LG
washing machine commercial. Short dark hair, blue dress, walking in



the street of a large city, returns home, throws the dress in to
steam, removes it, puts in on and goes out for the evening. I like
her hair. Can't find her identity on the internet but can find the commercial



at http://www.television-ads.com/tvl/lg.htm. Hope you can help.
Thanks!


Answer   Log in to add an answer
There is no answer at this time.


Comments   Log in to add a comment
Subject: Re: Model/actress in LG washing machine commercial
From: artqs-ga on 09 Aug 2006 22:57 PDT
 
I did some searching but came up empty handed. I did find a link on
LGusa.com that allows you to submit a question about their



advertising, though. Below "General Inquiries" just under the "PR"
heading, you can click "Advertising". A new window will come up,
allowing you to submit a question about their advertising. This may be



your best bet. Good Luck.

- artqs

http://www.lge.com/support/contact_us.jsp

Subject: Re: Model/actress in LG washing machine commercial
From: wrennie-ga on 10 Aug 2006 07:29 PDT
 
Thank you, artqs.  I did submit a question regarding that particular
commercial and we'll see what happens. I appreciate your advice.




wrennie
Subject: Re: Model/actress in LG washing machine commercial
From: taw21-ga on 14 Oct 2006 08:00 PDT
 
I was also impressed with this commercial, but due to the music.
Anyone know if it's an independant song from an album somewhere that I
could purchase?
Subject: Re: Model/actress in LG washing machine commercial
From: tecizak-ga on 07 Nov 2006 15:56 PST
 
taw21 The song you are referring to was made from this song: "Jens
Lekman - A Sweet Summer's Night on Hammer Hill". The original song



does not sound the same as it does in the commercial. (Live Video of
the song performed in Cleveland -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wj9vzczFMw )


__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
Yahoo! Photos

Upload Now!

First 20

prints are free

Y! GeoCities

Create a Web Site

Easy-to-use tools.

Get started now.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: [Bizarro_UltraZine] Federline -- bum and parasite ...

I just love these reality TV shows. I would imagine that they are both making a pretty penny on this. 

It would have been nice to snag this programming for Banal Media (BM) but it's beyond our modest economic reach.

They'll probably end up on Fox.

The folks that did the Nick and Jessica newlywed show wanted to do the Nick and Jessica divorce show, but Nick wised up and said no thanks. But Kevin and Brit are crass and greedy, and will not pass up the chance.

They are going to award custody based on who gets the most votes from viewers. I'll be there wearing my finger out dialing in my vote.

Which will be:  SACRIFICE THE LITTLE CREEPS TO SATAN, THEY'LL BE BETTER OFF THAN THEY WOULD WITH EITHER OF THESE JACKASSES.

On 11/9/06, kdhaisch@aol.com < kdhaisch@aol.com> wrote:

Federline Responds to Britney Divorce

Kevin Federline wasted no time in responding to his estranged wife Britney Spears' divorce plans by filing his own papers in Los Angeles yesterday.
 
According to the documents, Federline is asking for legal and physical custody of the couple's children, Sean Preston and Jayden James. He is asking the authorities to award Spears visitation rights. The custody battle is set to be the fiery aspect of the divorce -- in her petition, Spears asked for sole physical and legal custody of the kids.
 
and, even though Britney made Federline
sign a pre-nup...
 
Federline is also asking the court to award him spousal support.
 
Federline can kiss THAT good-bye!
Britney knew what she was doing when
she insisted on an ironclad pre-nup.
Seems Britney knew all along he was a bum
only interested in her money.
 
 
 
.


__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
Yahoo! Photos

Order Online

Pick up at Target

Start now

Y! GeoCities

Free Blogging

Share your views

with the world.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

Monday, November 06, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] Marvel Ultimate Alliance Team Builder

Check it out.  I call it The Titanic Tit Team™: Ultimate Alliance wallpaper featuring their Marvel Super Assholes™ dream team! Check it out HERE. Want to build your own custom Marvel wallpaper? Simply go to our website at MarvelUltimateAlliance.com and select Team Builder.

Marvel™: Ultimate Alliance is coming your way with the largest Asswipe Alliance EVER in one video game this Fall. Don't miss out! Don't ever leave your basement apartment, just yell at mom to bring you down a sandwich once in a while, and for the latest videos and screenshots, details on the game and the chance to gain VIP access to exclusive assets, go to MarvelUltimateAlliance.com

And Don't Forget To Vote For Team Bush!!!!
__._,_.___


SPONSORED LINKS
Holy bible Holy basil Holy spirit
Holy water Holy land gifts

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[CanYoAssDigIt] incompetent spam

Due to concerns, for the effectiveness and appearance of verisimilitude of your attempt to con me out of money, I demand you do a better job next time.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: SunTrust Bank <alert@suntrust.com>
Date: 6 Nov 2006 16:14:22 -0000
Subject: Re: Suntrust Online Banking Security Alert Update
To: mattlove1@earthlink.net




Dear Suntrust Bank Account Holder,

Due to concerns, for the safety and integrity of the Sun Trust Bank
account we have issued this warning message.

During our regularly scheduled account maintenance and verification
procedures, we were unable to verify your account information.
This might be due to either one of the following reasons:

1. A recent change in your personal information (ie change of address).
2. Submitting invalid information during the initial enrollment process.
3. An inability to accurately verify your account information due to an
internal error within our processors.

We demand that you take 3 minutes out of your online experience
and renew your records to avoid running into any future problems
with the online service. However, failure to update your records
will result in your account suspension. Once you have updated
your account records your internet banking service will not be
interrupted and will continue as normal.

Please follow the link below and renew your account information.

https://www.suntrust.com/SignOn/update

Thank you for your patience.
Your's Sincerely,
Sun Trust Bank Customer Service

__._,_.___


SPONSORED LINKS
Holy bible Holy basil Holy spirit
Holy water Holy land gifts

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Friday, October 20, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] Fwd: [progressive] brush clearing OF A PRESIDENT movie now on GoogleVideo

I think that it's scandalous that somebody has put this piece of trash up on the web to corrupt weak minds with. I strongly advise everybody to not watch this.  To watch it would be wrong. Terribly, terribly wrong.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Zoltan Abraham < zsazle@yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 20, 2006 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: [progressive] brush clearing OF A PRESIDENT movie now on GoogleVideo
To: progressive@yahoogroups.com

It seems that this video is one and a half hours long. I couldn't even get a minute into it, because it kept pausing. In any case, I would caution people against posting stuff that has to do with the death of the president in any way. That's the kind of stuff that the FBI is questioning high school students about. I would steer clear of this subject.
 
Zoltan

King Daevid MacKenzie <echoesmaster@charter.net> wrote:
http://video. google.com/videoplay?docid=298079003576064080&hl=en

...don't know if this is a legitimate placing by the filmmakers or
simply someone who recorded the recent British TV premiere and posted it
on their own. But if you're a Statesider, it may be your only chance to
see this before Bush declares watching it a terrorist act...

--
King Daevid MacKenzie, WLSU-FM 88.9 La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA
http://www.myspace.com/kingdaevid
heard Sundays 8:00 A.M. PST/PDT at
http://www.krfp.org/documents/listen_windowsmedia.asx
archived in mp3 at http://www.radio4all.net
"You can live in your dreams, but only if you are worthy of them."
HARLAN ELLISON





Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups .yahoo.com/group/progressive/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/ group/progressive/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:progressive- digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto: progressive-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
progressive-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/ info/terms/




Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

__._,_.___


SPONSORED LINKS
Holy bible Holy basil Holy spirit
Holy water Holy land gifts

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Thursday, October 19, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: [progressive] Young, Cold and for Sale: BOB HERBERT ; Run, Barack, Run: DAVID BROOKS +

When I saw the heading "Young, Cold, and for Sale" I thought that was the story about Barack Obama.

So New York Times writers support him as much as Time Magazine does. It looks like the fix is in, doesn't it?  I think all the editors and opinion writers for Time and the NYTimes on this list should vote for him.  The rest of us shouldn't and David Brooks gives many, many excellent reasons not to.

He does not demonize his opponents and tells audiences that he does not think George Bush is a bad man.

Now come on, if he doesn't think Dubya is bad, who does he think is?  Ming the Merciless?  Lex Luthor?  Some other imaginary bad person?  Chavez smelled the sulfer, and billions agreed that they smelled it too. I guess everything smells like roses to Obama.  Clearly, that powers that be want a guy like him in - no war crimes trials, no lobbying reform... perhaps a continuation of the war in Iraq, and no relief for poor and working people?  Has Obama said anything about these issues? I haven't seen the evidence.

He has a compulsive tendency to see both sides of any issue. Joe Klein of Time counted 50 instances of extremely judicious on-the-one-hand-on the-other-hand formulations in the book. He seems like the guy who spends his first 15 minutes at a restaurant debating the relative merits of fish versus meat.

The opinion formers quote each other, isn't that cute?  But of more concern... I can hear the chants being reprised already...."flip...flop....flip....flop...." And for good reason. I don't see any evidence that he stands for anything.

During our talk, I reminded Obama that at some level politics is about power, not conversation. He pointed out that he'd risen from nothing to national prominence in a few years so he knew something about acquiring power, but he kept returning to his mode, which is conversation, deliberation and reconciliation.

You know how consensus is really built in politics?  With lots and lots of horsetrading.  Team Reagan put on a tough front, but behind the scenes they were making deals like crazy.  "The pigs were really feeding at the trough," said David Stockman.  This is clearly Obama's starting point, without even the tough talk.

The contemporary guru he cites most is Warren Buffett.

That's pretty telling, isn't it?  There are worse takeover billionaires you could admire, but there are other political, economic and philisophical thinkers out there you could be studying besides takeover billionaires.

He, conceptually, welcomes free trade and thinks the U.S. may have no choice but to improvise and slog it out in Iraq.

Ah, so he does, kinda, sorta, take a stand on a couple of issues, and comes down on the wrong side.  I presume that he doesn't mean free trade, but rather the "free" trade that Clinton, Bush, and the billionaires they serve, support.

He is one of those progressives, like Gordon Brown in Britain, who is thinking about the challenges of globalization outside the normal cliches.

I wish that he wouldn't insult us by saying Obama is progressive.  Has the word lost all meaning?

Consider Brown for example: 
"Brown has strongly supported a number of aspects of US foreign policy, notably by voting for the invasions of Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003."  (Wikipedia).

Now we are getting to the gist of it. You are a weighty and significant "progressive if you think outside the normal cliches - that is, if you support the Bush agenda uncritically.

Brooks probably daydreams of a world where Gordon Brown plays poodle to Barach Obama.

this is how Omar Waraich puts it on the Counterpunch webside:

"[Blair's] critics, a vast multitude , are not entirely wrong about the prime minister. After all, it's plain from just glancing at the guy that he now embodies the ruin that he has supervised. Cracks have formed on his skin. That seraphic smile no longer cleaves his face. His hair has diminished in direct proportion to his popularity; what remains has grizzled.

"But there is much to be appreciated, too. Consider the alternative. Under chancellor of the exchequer Gordon Brown -- the patient successor to be -- it is unlikely that policies will alter course. Brown, we are assured, "will be absolutely New Labour to his fingertips and also, incidentally, a very strong supporter of the transatlantic relationship." As one MP has described the syzygy, "Blair and Brown are two cheeks of the same arse." There is, however, one principal difference: Brown has all the passion and affect of an ashtray. With Blair, you are at least guaranteed the odd moment of mirth."


I find much of this hauntingly familiar, and not at all reassuing.  Will Obama prove to be a matching cheek to Bush on the same presidential arse? 

Please, let's just not find out.

On 10/19/06, MA PA <drymarc2003@yahoo.ca> wrote:

 
Young, Cold and for Sale: BOB HERBERT ; Run, Barack, Run: DAVID BROOKS +
By BOB HERBERT, DAVID BROOKS - New York Times - Thursday, Oct. 19, 2006
Herbert: On Prostitution - Atlanta has become a hub of child prostitution and other forms of commercial sexual exploitation of children(the complete article). Republican Ad Calls Black Women "Ho's" and More
OP-ED COLUMNIST
Young, Cold and for Sale
By BOB HERBERT

Published: October 19, 2006


The girl approached me on a desolate stretch of Metropolitan Parkway, about halfway between the airport and the clustered lights of the downtown skyline. The night was unusually cold and she was shivering a little. She told me she was 15, but she didn't look more than 12.

It was bad enough that the child was outside at all at midnight. The fact that she was turning tricks was heartbreaking. I explained that I was a reporter for The New York Times and asked if she would wait while I went to get someone to help her. She looked surprised. ''I don't need any help,'' she said.

I had already spent a night traveling with undercover vice cops, and they had pointed out the different neighborhoods in which under-age prostitutes, some as young as 10, roamed the streets.
Continued:
http://mparent7777.livejournal.com/13646183.html



Disapproval of Republican-led Congress grows: poll
http://mparent7777.livejournal.com/13645587.html



Republican Ad Calls Black Women "Ho's"
http://mparent7777.livejournal.com/13641791.html



Report: Priest admits Foley relationship
http://mparent7777.livejournal.com/13641157.html



The U.S. healthcare model: Delay, deny, deceive
http://mparent7777.livejournal.com/13640048.html



Olbermann: 'Beginning of the end of America' (with video)
http://mparent7777.livejournal.com/13638973.html



OP-ED COLUMNIST
Run, Barack, Run
By DAVID BROOKS

Published: October 19, 2006

Whether you're liberal or conservative, you should hope Senator Barack Obama runs for president.


Barack Obama should run for president.

He should run first for the good of his party. It would demoralize the Democrats to go through a long primary season with the most exciting figure in the party looming off in the distance like some unapproachable dream. The next Democratic nominee should either be Barack Obama or should have the stature that would come from defeating Barack Obama.
Continued:
http://mparent7777.livejournal.com/13646508.html



And More on Today's Newswire
http://mparent7777.livejournal.com/2006/10/18/



MARC PARENT

CRIMES AND CORRUPTIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWS
http://mparent7777.livejournal.com/ Homepage
http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/14409 Archived
http://www.dailykos.com/user/ccnwon Archived

mparent


Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail


__._,_.___


SPONSORED LINKS
Holy bible Holy basil Holy spirit
Holy water Holy land gifts

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: [RxR108] Re: how to avoid being shot by a cop

I know that people like to attach a name to material from anonymous sources in order to give it a false sense of gravity (a principle I learned from Ralph Keye's wonderful book, "Nice Guys Finish Seventh" - check it out at http://www.ralphkeyes.com/pages/books_old/niceguys/) - but it seems bizarre that they would attribute this apology for bad police behavior to Cheri Lewis, part of the pathetically incompetent O J Simpson prosecution, an affair notible for police and prosecutorial misconduct.  I might add, a prosecution which unsuccessfully tried to sell racist behavior to a jury that was 3/4 black. 

So I know that Sheri Lewis isn't the sharpest tool in the shed, but would she address this diatribe to "slick"?  Might as well attribute this to Abraham Lincoln, it would be just as (un)believable, and it would have more gravity.

The anonymous author left off Rule #6:

Don't be black while being a citizen.

With Bush's signature on the new terrorism bill soon, we will soon have Rule #7:

Don't have an independent idea about politics.  Ever.

Welcome to the New Age, never thought we'd get this far!

On 10/18/06, asitistoday <asitistoday@yahoo.com > wrote:

I kknow this may seem like a lie...

I know a heck of a lot of cops.

MOST will admit they have never shot anyone.

--- In RxR108@yahoogroups.com, "shieldholder1" <shieldholder1@...>
wrote:
>
> How to avoid being shot by a cop
> by Cheri Lewis, Deputy District Attorney, Los Angeles, California
>
> "I've devised a five-point plan to help citizens avoid being shot by
> police. This plan may not prevent all shootings, but very few will
> take place when the plan is rigorously adhered to. So, here are the
> rules:
>
> Rule # 1
> DON'T COMMIT VIOLENT CRIMES. It seems elementary, but this rule is
> lost on many folks. They do the crime, get shot, and then wonder how
> it could have possibly happened to them? They whine that it is so
> unfair. Well, Slick, violent crime, like jumping in front of moving
> cars, is just a high-risk occupation, and, in case you missed it,
> committing violent crime makes police officers think you might not
be
> a good person.
>
> Rule # 2
> If you ignore rule No.1, and the police confront you, DON'T RUN AWAY
> FROM THEM. I know it's hard to believe, but that may make them think
> you're guilty of something. Hiding in bushes or closets makes some
> cops (mostly older ones) very nervous. They might even foolishly
> conclude that you're up to no good!
>
> Rule # 3
> If you disregard rules 1 and 2, and the cops catch up with you
anyway
> and inform you that you are under arrest, DON'T MAKE FAST MOVEMENTS
> WITH YOUR HANDS. I know it sounds silly, but grabbing a shiny beer
> can, a dark-colored wallet, or one of those snazzy and real-looking
> replica guns may make police officers mistakenly believe that you
are
> about to hurt them.
>
> Rule # 4
> If you disregard rules 1, 2, and 3, and manage to get what looks
like
> a deadly weapon into your hands, DON'T POINT IT AT THE COPS. We all
> know that you're basically a nice person, but that may be lost on
the
> police officers confronting you. In their paranoia, they may even
> believe they need to protect themselves.
>
> Rule # 5
> If you disregard rules 1, 2, 3, and 4, DON'T BE ASTONISHED IF THE
COPS
> DO NOT INSTANTLY TURN INTO YOUR PERSONAL CONFIDANT. They may be too
> preoccupied to realize that you're normally a splendid person and
that
> you're just having a bad day. They may be too preoccupied to see
that
> when you point a weapon at them in a threatening manner, it is just
> your way of crying out for help. We both know that the whole problem
> can be traced to the fact that your mother didn't breast feed you,
but
> some police officers are so cynical they just don't see it.
>
> So, there you have it. If you really apply yourself and obey even
some
> of the rules listed above, I bet you'll avoid the vast majority of
> police gunfire."
>


__._,_.___


SPONSORED LINKS
Holy bible Holy basil Holy spirit
Holy water Holy land gifts

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___