I've finally achieved consistency in my life. Any person of average or above intelligence can predict what I will say next with unerring accuracy. And what I say will always be wrong.

Tuesday, June 05, 2007

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: Bigger

Hey Sheila

Nice of you to get in touch with me and share this information with me!  I have to admit, to me it's a novel theory, I've never heard that before.  But there could be something to it, I wear size 14 1/2 shoes, and no woman has ever found me lacking in that other department, either.

In fact, in high school the cheerleading squad voted me "Most Likely Candidate For Penis Reduction Surgery" - it was funny, they'd always sing that George Harrison song "It's all too much" whenever I crashed their slumber parties.  So I think I'll skip going to brazty.com, but thanks for thinking about me!

Matt "Larger Than Average" Love

PS. if you want to have a .larger than average listening experience, check out Dweebish at www.myspace.com/DweebishBand. Terrific Music for Tumescent People!

On 6/2/07, Sheila H. Brandt < a.bong@aagai.com> wrote:
People judge your dick size by your shoes size.
With megadik you dont have to wear
bigger shoes to make women think you have a huge dick.
You can actually have it. http://brazty.com/
 
him with the first overall pick in 2002. Houston's all
Saturday, March 24, 2007
wheat gluten was a factor being investigated, and
looking for differentiation. A lot of people do the same
prisoners are people too, even if they have done

__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
Y! GeoCities

Share Interests

Connect with

others on the web.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

[CanYoAssDigIt] Fwd: [canadianclassicrock] The ultimate bar band -

good on them, can't let the canucks hold an important rocord like this...

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Whiskey Howl < whiskery_howl@yahoo.ca>
Date: Jun 5, 2007 5:02 PM
Subject: [canadianclassicrock] The ultimate bar band -
To: canadianclassicrock@yahoogroups.com

"The (Guiness) record had been 1,323 people playing the same song in
Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1994."

==

More than 1,680 guitarists play Deep Purple's 'Smoke on the Water' in
Kansas City
Published: Tuesday, June 5, 2007 | 1:03 PM ET
Canadian Press

KANSAS CITY, Kansas (AP) - More than 1,680 guitar players turned out,
tuned up and took part in what organizers say was a world record
rendition of Deep Purple's "Smoke on the Water" - a song that was the
first many of them ever learned.

Some came from as far away as California and Germany on Sunday to take
part in a Kansas City radio station's effort to break a Guinness world
record for the most people playing the same song simultaneously. The
record had been 1,323 people playing the same song in Vancouver,
British Columbia, in 1994.

Some of the 1,683 guitar players attempt a world record by playing
the Deep Purple song "Smoke on the Water" at Community America
Ballpark in Kansas City, Kan. (AP Photo/Orlin Wagner)Some of the 1,683
guitar players attempt a world record by playing the Deep Purple song
"Smoke on the Water" at Community America Ballpark in Kansas City,
Kan. (AP Photo/Orlin Wagner)

"It was cool to see little kids playing, people who had been playing
for their whole lives, like older people, and then I'm sure there were
people like me who just picked up the song a couple days before," said
Autumn McPherson, of Winfield, a senior at the University of Kansas.

Preliminary numbers show 1,683 people played the popular early '70s
guitar riff on Sunday at CommunityAmerica Ballpark.

"I thought it was going to be kind of cheesy," said Hannah Koch, of
Prairie Village, who came clad in an elf costume. "But after I got
here, I got caught up in the excitement of it."

Tanna Guthrie, a morning show host for KYYS (99.7 FM), came up with
the idea for the record attempt. She said her station will send
participant sign-up lists, photos, videos and copies of media coverage
to Guinness seeking official recognition of a record.
Continue Article

Guthrie said she chose "Smoke on the Water," a track off Deep Purple's
"Machine Head" album, because it's one of the first songs many
guitarists learn.

"You never know if you can pull something like this off," she said.

One of the participants, John Cardona of Hanford, California, said he
brought felt-tip pens so he could get others to sign his guitar.

"It was the guitar I learned on," the 41-year-old said. "It was very
dispensable on the way here, but very valuable to me now."

__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
Y! GeoCities

Share Your Resume

Show off your

talent and skills.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

Monday, June 04, 2007

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: [Bizarro_UltraZine] Courtney Love Makes Live Return

"Nobody's Daughter"  - that's harsh.  Her mother wrote a book about mother-daughter disfunctional relationships, drawing heavily on the experiences of 4 generations of her own family, and seems to be about the only somewhat normal one in the whole family.  But like dead husband Curt, Eminem and so many other celebs,  Courtney understands that if your an asshole, blame your parents, people will like you for it and buy your records.

On 6/4/07, kdhaisch@aol.com <kdhaisch@aol.com> wrote:

Courtney Love Makes Live Return

 
Rocker Courtney Love made a triumphant return to performing on Friday night when she teamed up with her producer Linda Perry on stage in Los Angeles.
 
The former Hole singer played a secret show at The House of Blues, performing four songs from her upcoming album Nobody's Daughter.
 
The brief set interrupted a gig by former Non-Blonde Perry who, as well as producing Love's new record, is also a co-songwriter and featured as co-frontwoman at the gig too, singing along and strumming an acoustic guitar during Love's songs. She introduced the star as a promising newcomer, joking, "She's got a cool name and a rock star thing going."
 
Singer/songwriter James Blunt, who has also worked with Perry, watched the show from the balcony. Love recently revealed her desperation to return to performing to Spinner magazine, saying, "I've been writing this record since I've been sober -- almost two months now. I feel like a f**king caged panther. I just want to get out and rock. I'm just so antsy about it. I can't eat, I can't sleep -- I need to play."
 
play on, Courtney!!!
 
 
 
 
.




See what's free at AOL.com.


__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
Y! GeoCities

Share Interests

Connect with

others on the web.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

[CanYoAssDigIt] Another typically Quixotic attack on the unassailable truth of American exceptionalism in historical virtue

I'm launching another typically Quixotic attack on yadda yadda yadda

I'd like to examine data such as "when non-property owning members of society were allowed to vote" and "when were seditious libel laws repealed" but for now I'll settle for the low hanging fruit of:  "when was slavery abolished" and "when did women get the vote"

First, the issue of slavery.  True, some podunk little place nobody ever heard of abolished slavery nearly a century before the US did - shoot, the cheese eating surrender monkeys abolished it TWICE before we did. And a few other places. But for right thinking people, the US provides the model.

1775 - Slavery abolished in Madeira.

1778 - Slavery declared illegal in Scotland .

1791 - (22-23 August) Uprising in the Clairiére de Bois-Calman in French West Indian colony of Saint-Domingue, led by Bouckman. This date (23 August) has been designated by UNESCO as the "International Day to Commemorate the Slave Trade and its Abolition".

1792 - (28 September) The Constituent Assembly abolishes slavery in France but not in the colonies; resolution for gradual abolition of the slave trade defeated in House of Lords.

1793 - Arrival in Saint-Domingue of Sonthonax, who abolishes slavery on the island (29 August) and organizes the election of several deputies, including a Black one, Jean-Baptiste Belley; white refugees pour into U.S. ports, fleeing the insurrection in Saint Domingue.

1794 - (4 February) In France, the National Convention adopts a decree abolishing slavery and emancipates all slaves in the French colonies; (22 March).

1802 - (2 May) Napoleon reinstates slavery and sends his soldiers to the colonies.

1804 – (1 January) the independent nation of Haiti is established by General Jean-Jacques Dessalines.  Haiti, or Ayiti in Creole, was the name given to the island by the indigenous Taino-Arawak peoples, meaning "mountainous country."

1805 - the Constitution of Haiti provides that any slave arriving in Haiti is automatically both free and a citizen of the country.

1807 - (25 March) Slave Trade Abolition Bill passed in the British Parliament; Britain prohibits slave trade;

1813 – Gradual emancipation adopted in Argentina.

1814 – Gradual emancipation begins in Colombia.

1815 – At the Congress of Vienna, the British pressure Spain, Portugal, France, and the Netherlands into abolishing the slave trade, though Spain and Portugal are permitted a few years of continued slaving to replenish labor supplies; Napoleon signs the decree of 29 March, abolishing slave trade for France. In reality, it was practiced illegally during most of the 18th century.

1822 - Liberia is founded as an African Colony for freed American slaves with land purchased by the American Colonization Society.

1823 - slavery abolished in Chile.

1824 - Abolition of slavery in Central America; Britain and U.S. negotiate a treaty condemning the slave trade as piracy and establishing joint procedures for its suppression.  However, the U.S. Senate makes a series of amendments to the treaty, and the British refuse to sign.

1826 - Abolition of slavery in Brazil (north of equator).

1829 - Slavery abolished in Mexico.

1831 - slavery abolished in Bolivia.

1833 - Abolition of Slavery British Empire Bill passed, with effect in the British West Indies from August 1834

1837 – Britain invites the U.S. and France to create a joint international patrol to stop slaving.  The U.S. declines to participate.

1838 – Most colonial assemblies in the British West Indies have introduced legislation dismantling the apprenticeship system for former slaves.  Laws against vagrancy and squatting attempt to keep the social and labor system of the plantation economies intact, with varying results; (1 August) enslaved men, women and children in British Empire became free.

1839 – (January) Nicholas Trist, U.S. Consul in Havana, recommends that the U.S. Administration dispatch a naval squadron to West Africa to patrol for slavers, warning that the British will police American vessels if the U.S. does not act

1841 – Nicholas Trist is dismissed as U.S. Consul in Havana amid allegations that he connived at, or made no effort to suppress, the illegal sale of U.S. vessels to Spanish slave traders; the Quintuple Treaty is signed, under which England, France, Russia, Prussia, and Austria agree to search vessels on the high seas in order to suppress the slave trade.

1842 - slavery abolished in Uruguay.

1848 - Slavery abolished in all French and Danish colonies. The provisional government of the 2nd Republic signs the final decree inspired by Schoelcher; Libreville, Gabon originally founded as a French trading post in 1843, is expanded with the settlement of freed slaves; Denmark/Norway abolishes slavery in its West-Indian colonies; emancipation by the French of their slaves.

1850 - The Fugitive Slave Law passed in the United States; California adopts a constitution forbidding slavery.

1851 – Slavery abolished in Ecuador; slave trade ended in Brazil.

1853 - Abolition in Argentina.

1854 - Abolition in Venezuela and Peru.

1857 - Dred Scott Decision holds that a Negro slave's residence in free territory does not make him free; Missouri Compromise declared unconstitutional saying that Congress had no right to prohibit slavery in the territories.

1862 – Slave trade ended in Cuba.

1863 - abolition in the Dutch colonies (Surinam, Curaç ao).

1865 - U.S. Civil War ends. Slavery finally abolished in United States territories as a result of the 13th amendment to the Constitution and the end of the Civil War.

The US does much better in women's sufferage, lagging behind gap-toothed sheep- shagging front running New Zealand by only a quarter of a century.  The model for the rest of the world came in 12th in this category.  Not too bad. It's kind of mind-boggling how recent all of this is...my father was born in 1913. His mother couldn't vote when he was born.  That seems like the very recent past to me...


  • 1893 New Zealand
  • 1902 Australia1
  • 1906 Finland
  • 1913 Norway
  • 1915 Denmark
  • 1917 Canada2
  • 1918  Austria, Germany, Poland, Russia
  • 1919 Netherlands
  • 1920 United States

Frowny Faces for Australia and that country I admire so much, Canada:

1. Australian women, with the exception of aboriginal women, won the vote in 1902. Aboriginals, male and female, did not have the right to vote until 1962.

2. Canadian women, with the exception of Canadian Indian women, won the vote in 1917. Canadian Indians, male and female, did not win the vote until 1960

But big Smiley Faces for some other places, like Kuwait which we liberated from Saddam in the 80s.  In 2005 they got around to letting women vote. Way to go, Dubya's Daddy's support turned out to be SO justified.  Also Smilies for Saudi Arabia - the only country with suffrage that does not allow its women to vote, but I'll bet they're kinda sorta maybe thinking about it, thanks to quiet diplomatic pressure from Condi Rice.

Two countries have no vote (male or female) at all: Brunei and the United Arab Emirates. But I'm sure the state department is  going to bring about a change in that situation any day now.


__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
Y! GeoCities

Share More

Create a blog, web

site, and more.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: [iChat] PSC reviews, Thomas Jefferson, and You

i'm not offended, just hoped to stir up a little thinking. I hope
discussion of ol tom is not off limits now. If we make it poltiically
incorrect to talk about the founding fathers, who knows? maybe next
they will make it politically incorrect to brag ourselves up, which is
what I think people should be doing.

About the only bigshot I have any respect for is Martin Luther King,
and I think that in part it's because it's acknowleged that the Civil
Rights Movement was a people's movement, and the people always get
co-star status with King.

I think we are giants, standing on the shoulders of midgets, and we
should feel good about that. No offense intended to short people.

On 6/4/07, Lisa Euster <leuster@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> Ah, well...Michael Woods already beat you to the punch in correcting me. I will endeavor to choose my words and sources more carefully.
>
> Sorry,
>
> Lisa Euster
> leuster@u.washington.edu
>
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Matt Love wrote:
>
> > I can't live without books, but I can live without slaves, which does
> > give me a bit of an edge over Tom, IMHO.
> >
> > By all means, support libraries, but don't do it because of appeals to
> > authority, particularly when it comes to the founding fathers, in
> > general a pretty despicable bunch..
> >
> > Do it because you're good enough, you're smart enough, and, doggonit,
> > people like you!
> >
> > On 6/4/07, Lisa Euster <leuster@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> >> "I cannot live without books." Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, June 10, 1815
> >> http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/jefferson_papers/mtjquote.html
> >>
> >> Surely you are not above Thomas Jefferson! The Puget Sound Council can help
> >> with your summer reading needs. Just come to the next meeting --
> >>
> >> UW Bothell Library - 2nd floor, upstairs and to the right
> >> June 7 9-11:30 AM
> >> Directions and a link to transit information are available at
> >> http://www.uwb.edu/admin/services/transportation/map.xhtml
> >> Parking is two dollars.
> >>
> >> This is the last meeting of the school year, so you have until September to
> >> read and review your selections. There will be a selection of 2-for-1 books
> >> - review 2 and you may keep one. There are classic and recent, fiction and
> >> non-fiction, picture books to young adult - a wide selection. Your reviews
> >> are published in the PSC newsletter and provide an important source of
> >> information for those who develop collections for young people.
> >>
> >> *And,* for the things you maybe could or could not live without, a silent
> >> auction! Past auctions have included edibles, crafts, books, accessories,
> >> and
> >> gift items. All proceeds support PSC. Come donate, bid, or both!
> >>
> >> This opportunity is open to students, alumni, and others, so you are welcome
> >> to participate. If you would like to participate and cannot attend, contact
> >> me for more information.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Lisa Euster
> >> leuster@u.washington.edu
> >>
> >> "a map of the world which does not include Utopia
> >> is not worth looking at"
> >> - Oscar Wilde
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> iChat mailing list
> >> iChat@u.washington.edu
> >> http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/ichat
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > iChat mailing list
> > iChat@u.washington.edu
> > http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/ichat
> >
>
>
>

__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
Yahoo! Photos

Upload & Order

Same-day pickup

at Target

Y! GeoCities

Create a Blog

And tell the world

what you think.

Yahoo! Groups

Take a Survey

express your ideas

share your opinion

.

__,_._,___

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: [OregonDems_etc] “THE WORLD TURNED UPSIDE DOWN”

Good point about the materials of war. However, the colonists were fighting on their own soil, familiar with local conditions, able to stockpile weapons anywhere within the entire territory. It's a terrific advantage, something the US knows both as colonists and colonizers.  The costs of occupation are acceptable to the occupiers because they mainly sustained by the lower classes.

The US constitution has served as a model for similar documents for other countries.  However, the good ideas are pretty universal. These come up again and again because they are good ideas, and people like them. They'd come up with them whether they were in the US Constitution or not - like the golden rule, which appears in all major religions - I'll give you a nickel if you can prove which one came up with it first, but there is something peculiarly arrogant about the desert religions that dominate the west - they each want to claim an exclusive lock on virtue and truth. The idea of exceptionalism is bunk, whether the religious practice involves sky gods or political gods.

The US handling of the indigenous population is a great illustration, thank you for bringing it up. One thing that lead to the founding of the nation was colonial impatience with how the British were dealing with the natives.  They insisted on negotiating with them rather than simply shoving them aside and killing them.  The colonists were impatient to capture their resources; they had their way, and it's been go go go ever since.

Canada proceeded along the British model, and while things are awful for natives there too, they are marginally better.

If my position is "typical", it's because it's true.  I bring up instances of abuse because in my philosophy, sweeping statements require supporting evidence.  These aren't isolated instances, but rather part of a rich, seamless tapestry of abuse. It would take time to report them all, but as it happens, I have lots of time.

Or we can talk about what's great about this country.  All the stuff that came from us, that's what's great about it.  Ice cream cones. Quilts.  The Ramones.  Civil Rights.  All the stuff that came from us, gained through struggle. They like to claim they gave to us, and we foolishly allow ourselves to believe them.

On 6/3/07, Larry Wilson <larry@larry-wilson.com > wrote:



On 6/3/07, Matt Love < matt.mattlove1@gmail.com> wrote:

> Who at the time would have predicted that the rag-tag American Colonists could defeat the British Army and Navy?

Maybe that's where the smart money was. The British Empire, was
pre-occupied with the French Empire at the time. The colonists had
the advantage of being on their home territory, and not having supply
lines that stretched across the ocean. Much like the situation the
Vietnamese nationalists were in when under attack by the American
Empire. The Vietnamese also had some assistance from rival empires.












America's supply lines DID stretch across the ocean, Matt.  Funded by Dutch bankers from the East India Trading Company, we bought arms that the French brought in by running the Brit's blockade.

Or, is that not across an ocean?? ;)

> That battle ushered in the beginning of America, the greatest bastion of freedom for all people that the world had ever known.

Baloney.

Consider the following: On February 5, 1783, Washington received a
letter from Marquis de Lafayette, whom Washington considered both a
friend and a son, that stated, "Let us unite in purchasing a small
estate, where we may try the experiment to free the negroes, and use
them only as tenants. Such an example as yours might render it a
general practice..." Washington was lavish in his praise for the plan,
but refused to join in. Lafayette went on with his plan alone, buying
land in the French colony of Cayenne.

Washington did free his slaves upon his death when he no longer had
need of them, but he did not free the slaves of his wife. While it was
kind of him to provide for her (I'm sure Dubya has similar provisions
in his will), she was forced to free her own slaves during her own
lifetime – the remaining slaves were so agitated by the freeing of
George's slaves that Martha feared for her life.

Jefferson's slaves, in fact, his own desendants, had to wait for the
the civil war for freedom.

It's worth considering inconvenient truths like this when
contemplating statements like "America, the greatest bastion of
freedom for all people that the world had ever known."






























It's typical of some people to discount the model of freedom that America brought to the world by bringing up specific instances of abuse.  Hell; we massacred a whole nation of indigenous people.

Still, we did bring a MODEL of freedom to the world, if not, in fact, all that it was cracked up to be.  We were still, at the time, one of the freest countries in the world.

Now, we're one of the most repressive, and Bush is doing what Hitler and Saddam did; getting people to be complicit.

In SERE school, we were taught to never agree.  If they said it was a nice day, we said nothing.  If they asked if we liked the food, we said nothing, if they asked if we wanted to see our parents again, we said nothing (or, in each case, we could recite the old name, rank, serial number.)  Getting you to agree to even to the benign statement is the start of converting you; of compromising you.

Our Congress, except for a very few (YEA!  Russ Feingold!), are on the road to being like the German Parliament of 1933.  Check that; not on the road, but at the destination.

Still, we USED to be an example, despite our abuses.

Your argument, Matt, is very much like the Bushies arguments that Bush isn't so bad, because Clinton had sex in the WH.

What is baloney is your specious, empty and irrelevant argument.
 

On 6/3/07, Kathleen Bushman <sassykathy46@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://thepoliticaljunkies.net/Themdems.htm
> UPDATED: JUN 3, 2007
>
> "THE WORLD TURNED UPSIDE DOWN"
> Mick Walker, TPJ Columnist
>
> When George Washington defeated General Charles Cornwallis at Yorktown in 1781, Cornwallis instructed the British band to play the tune, "The World Turned Upside Down." And indeed, it had. Who at the time would have predicted that the rag-tag American Colonists could defeat the British Army and Navy? That battle ushered in the beginning of America, the greatest bastion of freedom for all people that the world had ever known. And it has been a long run.
>
> I shudder to think about America in the 21st Century and where we stand now, thanks to some of our leaders who have steered us into the dark waters of greed and world dominance. I just wonder what grand scheme Bush and his pseudo-Christian Neocons have in mind for the entire world. With armies, and fearless puppets like Bush and his successors, they just might pull it off. If so, Americans will lose more freedoms, one by one, as they slip away in silence while we flip channels, gripe about prayer in the schools, or whether gays should marry or not.
>
> Maybe it will break like a dam, all at once someday when Washington announces there is no more money in the US Treasury for Social Security, Medicare, and basic Education programs for the kids. Maybe it will dawn on us someday that the Democrats, elected in good faith by the people, should have impeached Bush and Cheney right off the bat. And stopped the Iraq War dead in its tracks. Americans are tired of the war and the warlike image Bush has painted of America for the entire world to see. We said so at the polls in 2006. Imagine how the Iraqis would like us to stop the war and get out immediately. Unlike us, they have to endure the bombs and bullets and exist in their war-torn country that used to be Iraq.
>
> Think Bush and Cheney give a damn? Well, as arrogant as Bush is with his signing statements that override and cancel out legitimate laws passed by our own Congress, I have to doubt that he gives a damn about what we think. Look at how Bush wiretapped us without court orders and had Gonzales and Card try to get Ashcroft to sign off on it while he was in the hospital, under heavy medication and yet Ashcroft still refused to commit high treason against the Constitution by going along with Bush's demonic messengers. But then, I have to doubt that Bush gives much of a damn about the Constitution, either. Remember when he shouted to some congressmen who came to the White House to caution him about shredding the Constitution? "Don't keep throwing the Constitution in my face; it's just a goddamned piece of paper?" Bush told them. Do we need more proof that Bush cares very little for our Republic, our Democracy we used to call America, land of the free?
>
> The only thing that might change the course of Bush's wanton arrogance and disrespect for the rest of the world would be China and Russia combining forces to whup our asses with factories and cheap labor and giant oil reserves, not yet brought up to full capacity and utilization. Just look at us under this president. We are occupying two countries where shooting and killing in the streets is the norm.
>
> For the world to survive, the US needs to wise up and stop occupying nations, depleting our Reserve Army and choking off the world's oil supplies from several countries, many of whom have thermonuclear weapons and sophisticated delivery systems. Forget Iran getting a suitcase bomb. Look to China and Russia. They got 'em. Even after Reagan brought Russia to their knees (Yeah, right). We best remind ourselves to consider the superpowers that might just get pissed off at us enough someday to call us out on our octopus-grabbing diplomacy that reaches out with ships, planes, and high-tech weapons to grab as much oil real estate in the world as Exxon and Halliburton can use to make record profits. Okay, so Might is Right. But still, we best not forget the Chinese and try to cut them off in our oil heist of greed. We had better take heed of their multi-million-man army, manufacturing expertise and evolving technology, not to mention the mammoth numbers of oil-hungry Chinese consumers.
>
> I used to think, "Just wait until the Chinese improve their technology and get big into the auto manufacturing industry." Well, it slipped up on me. Yesterday is today. They've arrived. And China is out to boldly trounce all competition in all the auto manufacturing, no doubt about it. They lead the field already in affordable gasoline, hybrid, and electric cars. The key word here is affordable. Many Chinese car companies are going for the gold in new technology that depends dramatically less upon oil as a fuel while the pig-hungry world oil companies like Exxon continue to laugh at us as gasoline at the pump begins seriously to hurt Americans and the rest of the world.
>
> The Chinese motorcar companies aren't there yet as serious contenders against GM, Toyota, and Nissan. But let's look at some of the facts. For openers, the major car manufacturers in the world have just scratched the surface on alternative energy cars. Toyota's Prius, the world's best hybrid according to Consumer Reports, averages about 46 miles per gallon. And no world large manufacturer will be offering a serious all-electric car in the near future. Why not? Who cares? It appears the Chinese are coming to rescue the world from our dependency on oil.
>
> In March 2007, Tiger Truck announced that it would build the first U.S. assembly plant in Jasper, Texas, for vehicles based on designs by China's third largest car manufacturer, ChangAn Automobile Group. The Jasper facility, on a 92-acre site with a capacity of 7,500 vehicles annually, will employ 100 workers. It's a bold beginning. What is most impressive is that Tiger Trucks is but one of many Chinese car companies who are looking to the future in addressing the problem of rising oil costs. Tiger Trucks manufactures trucks, vans, and cars in all three categories: gasoline and diesel, hybrid, and fully electric. The fully electric Tiger Truck Star, for example is a LSV (Low Speed Vehicle) and can achieve a maximum speed of only 24 MPH, but can carry some hefty payloads of 1500 pounds. For in-town driving, mail carriers, and short runs to the post office and grocery store, they are ideal as an answer to driving conditions where there is street only, stop, and start driving. These fully enclosed, large bed trucks can go up to 50 miles before recharging, but they come with and onboard recharger, too. This Tiger Truck comes with many options, including dump beds, half cabs, and crew cabs. The MSRP is a mere $13,999. You can get one in a gasoline version for $11,795, one in a hybrid or a flex fuel vehicle. The Tiger Truck website is fun to read as one ponders little or no direct fuel cost for a brand, spanking-new vehicle. Quite a contrast when gasoline at the pump averages $3.22 per gallon, eh?
>
> This is China's answer to higher oil prices while Bush's belligerent, bite-me diplomacy of Shock and Awe sends America to the poor house with endless borrowing and spending that sees America in debt now at almost 9 TRILLION DOLLARS. Have we lost our minds? Doesn't history tell us that the Japanese used their ingenuity and abilities to create a wealthy, solvent manufacturing economy and rich country by staying out of world occupation and conflicts? After WW II, they learned their lesson. Is electing a Democrat Congress our only salvation? As Congress fiddles and funds Bush's mad Iraq War without a pullout timetable, what has our country gained? Is our duly elected Democrat majority in both houses impotent because they fear someone might whisper that they do not support the troops? Is that why we went to the ballot box in 2006, to see Bush continue the mad occupation of Iraq, torn by civil war and fragmented theocracies parading as a Purple-Thumb democracy? Are the Democrats all talk? Some of them struggled, voted to fund the troops, and stated that they hated it that their vote to fund enabled Bush to continue his mindless Iraq War. But the result is the same as though they were glad.
>
> We continue to languish in a world gone wrong, one we helped to create and agitate. While we borrow and spend Trillions of dollars we don't have (does bankruptcy ever cross our mind?) China mass-produces world goods and expands the trade deficit with us and other countries. China will need oil, to be sure, and the oil rich countries the USA occupies will definitely be a part of the passion play when China decides it needs more oil sources. Our invading Iran right now to sew up 2 out of 3 of the world's biggest pools of oil might make China extremely nervous, if not downright angry.
>
> It's probably best that we cannot see into the future. But one thing is certain, and that is that the oil crunch drama will play out soon. Meanwhile, America seems hopelessly stuck in the state of producing weapons and weapons technology. Perhaps war is the only profitable world business America can hope for in the 21st Century. And keeping enough of the weapons you produce insures the ability to attack another country, Iraq, for instance, at will. Especially since Iraq is the second largest oil source in the world. And might is right, right? Maybe that's our legacy. Or our insanity if we do not change course. Instead, we rattle sabers at Iran, the third richest oil deposit in the world. The future looks grim. It appears that even a majority of the American people cannot elect a Congress to do the right thing. One misunderstood Bushism in a world of agitated world powers with real weapons, might light the match. We cannot live in a World Turned Upside Down. We must don our White Hat again and be an inspiration to the world, not a bully. We must change course.
>
> --
> "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution
> inevitable." - JFK
>
>




--
Larry

"The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist".

Winston Churchhill


__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
Yahoo! Photos

Order at Yahoo!

Pick up at Target

Y! GeoCities

Free Blogging

Share your views

with the world.

Yahoo! Groups

Take a Survey

express your ideas

share your opinion

.

__,_._,___