Even Reaganites have turned against the current Messianic war:
 
 August 24, 2007
 A Hegemonic Hubris
 More War on the Horizon
 
 By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
 
 No pullout from Iraq while I'm president, declares George W. Bush.
 
 On to Iran, declares Vice President Cheney.
 
 Israel is a "peace-seeking state" that needs $30 billion of US
 taxpayers' money for war, declares State Department official Nicholas
 Burns.
 
 The Democratic Congress, if not fully behind the Iraqi war, at least
 no longer is in the way of it.
 
 Nor are the Democrats in the way of the Bush regime's build up for
 initiating war with Iran.
 
 The Bush regime says it is going to designate part of Iran's military
 -- the Revolutionary Guards -- a terrorist organization, whose bases
 and facilities Bush intends to bomb along with Iran's nuclear energy
 sites. Three US aircraft carrier strike forces are deployed off Iran.
 B-2 Stealth bombers are being fitted to carry 30,000 pound
 "bunker-buster" bombs to use against hardened sites. Politicized US
 generals assert that Iran is providing arms and aid to the Iraqi
 resistance to the US occupation. The media are feeding the US
 population the same propaganda about nonexistent Iranian weapons of
 mass destruction that they fed us about nonexistent Iraqi weapons of
 mass destruction. A former CIA Middle East field officer, Robert Baer,
 has written in Time magazine that the Bush regime has decided to
 attack the Revolutionary Guards within the next 6 months. Remember the
 "cakewalk war"? Well, this time the neocons think that an attack on
 the Revolutionary Guards will free Iran from Islamic influence and
 cause Iranians to back the US against their own government.
 
 Lies, unprovoked aggression, and delusional expectations -- the same
 ingredients that produced the Iraq catastrophe -- all over again. The
 entire Bush regime and both political parties are complicit, along
 with the media and US allies.
 
 According to Baer, the Bush regime has given no consideration to
 whether Iran's response to a US attack might be different than to
 welcome it as liberation. What if Iran really were to arm the Iraqi
 resistance and/or to sink our aircraft carriers? How can any
 government, even one as incompetent, delusional and unaccountable as
 the Bush regime, initiate war without any thought to the consequences?
 
 The Bush regime's planned war against Iran casts light on the large
 increase in military armaments that the US is supplying to Israel.
 With Iraq in chaos and civil war, an attack on Iran leaves as
 opposition to Israel only Syria and Hezbollah in southern Lebanon.
 Israel cannot finish off the Palestinians until Hezbollah is
 destroyed. An Israeli attack on Syria while the US attacks Iran would
 leave Hezbollah without supplies in the face of a new Israeli attack.
 
 The agenda unfolding before our eyes may be the
 neoconservative/
 check to Israeli territorial expansion.
 
 Nicholas Burns said that the $30 billion in military aid was not
 conditional on any Israeli concessions or progress toward resolving
 the conflict with the Palestinians. Israel's ghettoizing and ethnic
 cleansing of the Palestinian West Bank proceeds apace.
 
 Meanwhile in America, while more money is poured into more war,
 condemned bridges collapse killing Americans who trusted their
 government to provide safe infrastructure. Devastated residents of New
 Orleans remain unaided. Financial difficulties deepen for more
 Americans as falling home prices and jobs lost to offshoring push more
 Americans into desperate straits. The US dollar continues to fall as
 the government's war debts build up abroad.
 
 Except for the armaments industry, where is the gain to America in
 Bush's wars? Before Bush invaded Afghanistan, the Taliban had stamped
 out drug production. The US invasion has brought it back.
 
 On August 22 Bush told the Veterans of Foreign Wars that US troops are
 the "greatest force for human liberation the world has ever known."
 Tell that to the 650,000 dead Iraqis and the 4 million displaced
 Iraqis, and the tens of thousands of slaughtered Afghans, and the
 coming civilian deaths in Iran. Tell that to all the bombed civilians
 from Serbia to Africa who are blown to pieces in order that a US
 president can make a point. Bush goes far beyond George Orwell's
 "Newspeak" in his novel, 1984, when Bush equates US hegemony with
 liberation.
 
 America's hegemonic hubris is a sickness. A country that tolerates a
 war criminal while he openly plans to attack yet another country is
 definitely not a light unto the world.
 
 Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the
 Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street
 Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He
 is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions. He can be reached at:
 PaulCraigRoberts@
 
 
 Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment