Posted by: matt love <mattlove1@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (1) |
I've finally achieved consistency in my life. Any person of average or above intelligence can predict what I will say next with unerring accuracy. And what I say will always be wrong.
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (1) |

| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (1) |
Thursday, November 9, 2017 5:32 PM
Lovely Priscilla: hello. how are u doing.
Matt Love: I'm good baby, I'm just walking back to my room from a
show at Casa do Mancha. it is so nice to hear from you
Lovely Priscilla: thank u
Matt Love: I have known 3 Priscillas in my life and they were all top girls
Lovely Priscilla: oh okay. has u date any of them before
Matt Love: Priscilla Sorcery, Priscilla Castro and Priscilla Dean.
What the hell? Stupid autocorrect... Not Sorcery, Dorcett
Lovely Priscilla: have I wrong u
Matt Love: She married Blair Davis... I should have dated her.
Lovely Priscilla: oh sorry
Matt Love: She was a good ol' girl, very pretty. But I couldn't date
her, she was best friends with Teresa Quirk, who was my girlfriend for
5 minutes
Lovely Priscilla: oh okay
Matt Love: The code of the west and all, I grew up in Wenatchee.
Lovely Priscilla: I want to be your wife forever.
Matt Love: And then there was Priscilla Castro. I would have written
Brown Eyed Girl for her, but Van Morrison beat me to it.
Lovely Priscilla: oh oaky. forget about them lets talk.
Matt Love: Let's get to you soon. Priscilla Castro and I even had a
waterfall. She pretended she was going to jump over it, but she only
wanted me to grab her breasts, but I was too stupid to know it. I
wrote a song about Priscilla Castro. I'll send you a link to it later
when I get back to my room.
Lovely Priscilla: oh okay.
Matt Love: And then there was Priscilla Dean. She changed my life and
not in a good way I had a sense of foreboding when I saw those
pumpkins. I mean, what the fuck, did a Halloween ship capsize?
Lovely Priscilla: How many brothers and sisters do u have?
Matt Love: I am the last of my breed, it's just me and my daughter
left. She doesn't know about you. Priscilla. How old is you?
Lovely Priscilla: 32. how old are u
Matt Love: You are3 years younger than my daughter, you ok with that?
Lovely Priscilla: yes why not . how old are u
Matt Love: 61 but not a bad specimen all things considered. Do you
object to being Priscilla number 4?
Lovely Priscilla: no I want to be Priscilla number1
Matt Love: I could move you to the head of the line if you meet my criteria.
Lovely Priscilla: oh okay.
Matt Love: Do you like the B-52s?
Lovely Priscilla: yes . Do you know what you want in a new partner?
Matt Love: Someone who likes the b-52s. And also Harry Chapin.
Lovely Priscilla: oh oaky. I am searching for someone who shares the
following qualities with me. Thoughtful, loving, goal oriented, along
with sense of humor. I love to laugh and smile
Matt Love: I am all laughs all the time. I was sad when I was young,
but now I'm like the laughing Buddha. You know the one?
Lovely Priscilla: oh okay
Matt Love: You won't leave me standing there with your wedding ring
in my hand? The way Priscilla Dean did? The way Corine France did?
Lovely Priscilla: yes I will not I promise with my mother's grave.
Matt Love: The ancestors... There are getting to be more of them all
the time. Is your father still with you?
Lovely Priscilla: he also passed away
Matt Love: Mine too
Lovely Priscilla: so I stay with my aunty in Ghana.
Matt Love: We are both orphans.
Lovely Priscilla: oh oaky
Matt Love: But it is to be expected at my age. You are so young. It
is tragic when the good die young and they are the only ones that do
Lovely Priscilla: age is just a number
Matt Love: Do you remember that song that goes "my mamma was a
prostitute, my daddy was a priest, I'm a motherfucking outlaw, a
badass jungle beast"?
Lovely Priscilla: oh sorry
Matt Love: Oh. I wrote that one.
Lovely Priscilla: okay
Matt Love: It was 78 with a bullet in Hoboken NJ in 1978
Lovely Priscilla: really
Matt Love: It kind of sums up my life. In a deeply meaningful way.
Lovely Priscilla: oh okay.
Matt Love: Do you like Abba?
Lovely Priscilla: yes
Matt Love: I'm not gay or anything, but the older I get the more I
dig them. What's your last name?
Lovely Priscilla: Amofo. Do you have any woman in your mind for now?
Matt Love: Give a little time to answer. I'm drunk and I'm lost.
Lovely Priscilla: oh okay
Matt Love: I need to find my room.
Lovely Priscilla: oh okay
Matt Love: I wrote a song about this and now it has come true.
Lovely Priscilla: really can I hear the song
Matt Love: I'll send a link when I get back to my room. Do you like musicians?
Lovely Priscilla: why not
Matt Love: There is music everywhere here. Good lord, that sounds
like Pearl Jam. I didn't come all the way to Brazil to hear Eddie
Vedder. Give me Samba, or give me deaf!
Lovely Priscilla: oh oaky
Matt Love: One more hill to climb. Then its all downhill
Lovely Priscilla: oh oaky
Matt Love: I am back in my room
Lovely Priscilla: can I hear the song
Matt Love: yes baby. The Brazil of my imagination just now became
the Brazil of my reality:
https://soundcloud.com/the-waiters-948227981/ugly-american. Could you
be my Venus?
Lovely Priscilla: oh okay
Matt Love: Here is another song about Venus, from my childhood (I
didn't write it, I just listened to it):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8C8pyuOO5U
Lovely Priscilla: thank u.
Matt Love: and here is my song about Priscilla Dean:
https://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=5602479
Lovely Priscilla: oh okay sorry.
Matt Love: and here is my song about Priscilla Castro (I had my robot
sing it, it was too painful for me to sing):
https://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=10133954
Lovely Priscilla: okay lets talk I want to know much about u.
Matt Love: here is lots of information about me:
https://www.last.fm/music/Matt+Love/+wiki
Lovely Priscilla: oh oaky
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (1) |
Who the fuck is thisOn Aug 16, 2017 2:11 PM, "matt love" <mattlove1@gmail.com> wrote:Hey Amy, I think you should give up trying to get in touch with Yngwie, and hook up with me instead. I wrote a song for you with the intent of persuading you this is the right thing to do: https://soundcloud.com/wacky-moose/amy
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (1) |
My Name is David Micheal Sansbury. I was born on the 15th of January 1965 at Baptist Hospital of Miami. I started A & A Children Academy at 6 and later on continued from Calvary Baptist Church Schools. I was very playful at school and it affected my academic works. I joined the Military academy at the age of 16. I was in the boarding school so my parents visit me once in a while. I didn't spend much time at home,later studied law at the university of Miami,i am a also a criminal lawyer.. My mom was a head teacher and dad was in the medical field of the army.
I fought in the Gulf war in 1990 to 1991. The gulf war was fought to liberate Kuwait from autocratic rule of the late Saddam. I had a pretty bad experience. Well,I am an E-6 Staff Sergeant (SSG) and now working with the UN. I also act as a platoon sergeant in the absence of the Sergeant First Class. I am the leader of my squad. I am a non commission officer at least now I will be out of action for at least 2 months or more.
The good news is that Our General return back to the camp spoke to the troop, that went to the special mission that the President of Afghanistan was highly impressed and has commended our effort towards the invading of the hide out of the Taliban (Rebels) and for the rescue of some high Government officials and some other citizens who where held hostage in the Taliban's hide out. He has compensated each soldiers that went for the special mission, while the 4(four) Majors who were the head of the troops were highly compensated adequately among them 2 died and 1 was seriously injured why i sustain a gunshot to my leg and one was injury free. I was among the. Majors that were injured and we were compensated with $53,800,000 USD ( Fifty three Million Eight Hundred Thousand United State Dollars) each, for taking the bold action toward the invading of the Taliban Terrorist camp. This money was given in cash to the General and was told to share it to us please keep this to yourself for the sake of my job and my reputations no one should know or hear about this am telling you, this because i have no other means and i do not have any surviving family.
We were advised by our General to dispatch the money from the camp on time because the United States Over viewing Security check on our camp time to time, and this might be in 6 days time and we are not allowed to keep money in the camp. my fear is that this money cannot be safe in this camp because we are not allowed to keep cash. My thought was,Who do I send it to, who can i trust to keep it for me safely? fate brought us together for a purpose. I strongly believe in my heart that you are not going to betray my trust, just have less than few months to leave the Army.
The money is handed over to me in cash and the moment i started thinking who will keep this for me when i have my share of the money,i thought of sending this email to your address , I nursed no fear, I felt no doubt, I believe that it will be safe with you. There won't be any problem, all you need to do is receive the money through a diplomat and safe keep it until I come over for my share i will offer you 30% of the total money, after this mission is over as soonest.
i don't want you to say a word about this to anyone please am writing you this message with so much trust,but also scared and i need to let my fears leave me and i did that because i want you to keep this money for the betterment of our lives in the future; the only problem will be when you tell people because they will want to steal the money from you by all means. would you safe guard the money for us? our medical supply team will be coming in 4 days time, all I need to do is hand over the save box, that i kept the money with a Red Cross man, I will carefully wrap the money in an ultra violet material and safely place in a metal box used for our medical supply by the Red Cross and it will get to you. I can plead with the flight accompanying diplomat from the Red Cross that clears our medical supply to left
it out of our base, so he could deposit it in a shipping company well known to him to deliver it to you,how secretive i am about this save box i will not tell the Red Cross man what is inside the box for security purpose and for my own good.please let me have your complete:
Home Address..............
House Number..............
Street Name.................
Telephone Number.................this details will be needed by the shipping company to deliver the the save box to you.
Regards,
Sgt.David Michaels Sansbury.
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (1) |
Hi, I'm Katie Lepri, the Public Insight Network analyst for WLRN, South Florida's NPR station.
Palm Beach County is looking to open an authentic Japanese inn, called a "ryokan," at the Morikami Museum and Gardens. The inn was part of the original masterplan for the property 30 years ago. However, the county is only now starting to make moves to bring lodging to the grounds.
Would you stay at Morikami Museum and Gardens? Be part of the conversation by telling us here or contact reporter Isabella Cueto at icueto@wlrnnews.org.
The deadline for this story is today, so if you have some time to respond, we'd appreciate hearing from you soon.
Thank you.
Katie
--
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (1) |
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (1) |
Photo by thierry hermann | CC BY 2.0
This week began with a mass email from the head of the Democratic National Committee, who declared: "By now, Americans know beyond any reasonable doubt that the Russian government orchestrated a series of cyberattacks on political campaigns and organizations over the past two years and used stolen information to influence the presidential campaign and congressional races." DNC chair Donna Brazile went on: "The integrity of our elections is too important for Congress to refuse to take these attacks seriously."
The importance of election integrity had eluded Brazile when she was a regular on CNN, posing as neutral in the Clinton-Sanders battle. "Brazile is not apologizing for leaking CNN debate questions and topics to the Hillary Clinton campaign during the Democratic primary," the Washington Post reported last month. "Her only regret, it seems, is that she got caught."
Many big factors affect any presidential race, and the Russian government may have tried to be one of them for the 2016 election — though it's hardly the slam dunk that agencies like the CIA and U.S. mass media are now claiming. But in any event, this month it has become routine for a lot of progressive organizations and individuals to descend into a dangerous mode of partisan flackery.
Less than two weeks ago — as soon as unnamed CIA sources told journalists that the Kremlin was behind hacks of DNC and Clinton campaign emails — a wide range of progressive online groups, activists and commentators reflexively embraced the dominant media spin. High profile among them was MoveOn, which used its big digital footprint to spur the frenzy.
MoveOn matter-of-factly decried the "chilling news" of "Russia's election tampering." And, without a hint of media literacy, the group also informed its readers that "news broke that the Russian president himself was involved in the efforts to influence our November election — in favor of Donald Trump."
Such eagerness to share undocumented spin as absolute fact has led many progressive groups to go with knee-jerk reactions. Bent on gaining a propaganda advantage over Trump, those reactions are helping to stampede this country toward a modern form of McCarthyism — as well as brinkmanship with Russia that could lead to a cataclysmic military conflict.
Zeal to blame Russia for a bad election outcome has spread like contagion among countless self-described progressives, understandably appalled by the imminent Trump presidency. But those who think they're riding a helpful tiger could find themselves devoured later on.
If civil liberties instead of repression and diplomacy instead of war are progressive values, then all too many progressives — eager to tar Trump as a Kremlin product — have been undermining those values.
Already, from witch-hunt legislation in Congress to pernicious media blacklisting, the anti-Russia hysteria — being fueled by the high octane election-intervention storyline — has gained enormous momentum.
Days ago, assessing the momentum of that hysteria, Russian studies scholar Stephen F. Cohen cited some of the key motives propelling it (the first of which touted extremely farfetched hopes):
* "One is to reverse the Electoral College vote."
* "Another is to exonerate the Clinton campaign from its electoral defeat by blaming that instead on Putin and thereby maintaining the Clinton wing's grip on the Democratic Party."
Thus, countless Bernie supporters have been unwittingly strengthening the Clinton wing of the party while beating on the anti-Putin drum.
* "Yet another is to delegitimate Trump even before he is inaugurated. And certainly no less important, to prevent the détente with Russia that Trump seems to seek."
Of all the good reasons to "delegitimate" Trump, alleged Kremlin intervention in the election should rank quite low. Trump's evils are huge, with a very incomplete list including vast greed, pathological lying, contempt for facts, enthusiasm for oligarchy, bigotry, environmental destruction, racism, misogyny, economic injustice, voter suppression and rampant conflicts of interest.
While echoing the anti-Russia themes belted out by Democratic Party officials and loyalists, the chorus on the left may think it's merely grabbing the low-hanging political fruit of this historical moment. But the fruit is already turning rancid, and apt to become poisonous. It won't be the first time in recent decades when liberals and others thought they were being clever and politically adroit as they aided and abetted the suppression of principles found in the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments, while helping to gear up the machinery of war.
This month, by following the line of the Democratic Party leadership, groups like MoveOn actually have helped to set the stage for pressurizing Trump to deter him from pursuing policies that may be (along with opposition to trade deals such as the TPP) the only ways in which he might be appreciably better than Hillary Clinton would have been as president.
Let's face it: Some of the fierceness of media attacks on Trump, such as from de facto neoconservative liberal-tinged entities like the Washington Post, is propelled by rage that his stance toward Russia lacks the neocon qualities that a Hillary Clinton presidency offered.
To be crystal clear: The election of Donald Trump as president is a horrific disaster, and his regime must be resisted on a vast array of issues with eternal vigilance. And, meanwhile, Vladimir Putin is a repressive ruler.
At the same time, it's a rather glaring omission in the current outraged discourse that the U.S. government, from Egypt and Saudi Arabia to Central Asian nations and beyond, continues to avidly support regimes far worse than Russia's. As for intervening in foreign elections, the CIA has excelled at that anti-democratic game for many decades — and mainline U.S. media outlets have been inclined to nod or even cheer when the American government and allied U.S. operatives succeed in working their will on electorates overseas.
Oh, and must we forget that U.S. efforts to determine the government leaders of other countries have sometimes gone far beyond techniques like hacking and disseminating emails? As Janine Jackson of the media watchdog group FAIR wrote, "in back of it all, what makes the umbrage of elite media so hard to stomach is the hypocrisy. This is, after all, the same elite media that supports outsider-induced 'regime change' anywhere and everywhere they see an official enemy, from Iraq to Honduras to Libya to Syria… You can make 'one law for me, another for thee' your credo, but you can't be too surprised when others are unimpressed."
And Jackson added: "Whatever story there is to be told about Russia and the 2016 election, corporate media have squandered the credibility it would take to tell it."
Now, a crucial choice is right in front of the progressive groups and commentators who've been echoing the anti-Russia barrage from U.S. mass media. Staying on course will help to undermine civil liberties at home and will help to escalate conflicts with Russia that could end with nuclear war. Doesn't sound "progressive" to me.
Norman Solomon is executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy, where he coordinates ExposeFacts. Solomon is a co-founder of RootsAction.org.
The Electoral College is meeting in six days to decide who will be the next president of the United States, and we have a critically important decision to make before that happens.Hi Justin—I just wanted to make sure you saw Anna's message. There's still time to cast your vote!
Dear MoveOn member,
The Electoral College is meeting in six days to decide who will be the next president of the United States, and we have a critically important decision to make together before that happens: Should MoveOn call on the Electoral College to reject Donald Trump as president of the United States?
This would be a big step for us, but the CIA's reported conclusion that the Russian government actively interfered with the U.S. presidential election—with the goal of helping Trump win—is a big deal.1
Before we decide whether to enter this fight, we need your input: Should MoveOn call on the Electoral College to reject Donald Trump as president of the United States?Yes, MoveOn should call on the Electoral College to reject Trump.
Note: Your vote must be received by 11:59pm E.T. on Wednesday, December 14 to be counted. Only your first click will be recorded, so please take care in making your choice.
There were many arguments for the Electoral College to reject Trump, even before the CIA's revelations.
Ethics experts—Republican and Democrat—say that Trump's business entanglements with foreign governments will put him in violation of the U.S. Constitution the minute he's sworn in.2 He has now delayed giving any answers on how he will (or won't) resolve these conflicts until after the Electoral College votes.3
Already, one Republican elector from a state Trump won has said that he will not cast his vote for Trump—and he says there are others who will not either.4
Several lawsuits have been filed to allow electors to vote their conscience without facing fines or legal punishment. A bipartisan group of electors has sent an open letter to intelligence agencies requesting access to classified information on Russian interference in the election—a request that MoveOn is actively supporting.5 And this weekend, Representative Jim Himes became one of the first members of Congress to call for the Electoral College to reject Trump.6
Let's be clear:
- The MoveOn community overwhelmingly wants to abolish the Electoral College. We believe in "one person, one vote."
- Given that the Electoral College does exist, there's a strong case that it should serve its constitutional purpose. The Electoral College "was primarily designed to stop a demagogue—a tyrannical mass leader who preys on our prejudices—from becoming President."7 And, as spelled out in the Federalist Papers, to prevent "the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils."8 That's what we will urge the Electoral College to do, if MoveOn members vote to move ahead with this effort.
- The odds of this effort succeeding in denying Trump the White House are exceedingly small. It would take 37 "conscientious electors" from states that voted for Trump to defeat him.
- But that doesn't necessarily mean that we shouldn't try. Even a small number of electoral votes against Trump will send a strong message that he does not have a mandate. It will remind Americans that Trump lost the popular vote by 2.8 million votes. It could embolden lawmakers to investigate Russian meddling in the election. And it could strengthen the movement against some of Trump's most shocking nominees, including Rex Tillerson, the long-time CEO of Exxon Mobile, who has deep ties to Vladimir Putin, and John Bolton, the extreme hawk who's being proposed as Tillerson's deputy.
If two-thirds or more of MoveOn members vote "yes," we will mobilize our resources in the remaining time we have—joining with protests in state capitals around the country next Monday, organizing our members to call on specific electors to reject Trump, and more. And in any scenario, we will continue to call for electors to be fully briefed on what the CIA knows before they are asked to vote.
With just six days until the Electoral College meets to elect our next president, we need to decide NOW whether to join the movement calling on the Electoral College to stop Trump. Will you tell us what you think?Yes, MoveOn should call on the Electoral College to reject Trump.
Your vote must be received by 11:59pm E.T. on Wednesday, December 14 to be counted. Only your first click will be recorded, so please take care in making your choice.
Thanks for all you do.
–Anna, Mark, Robert, Iram, and the rest of the team
Sources:
http://act.moveon.org/go/7134?1. "Russian Hackers Acted to Aid Trump in Election, U.S. Says," The New York Times, December 9, 2016t=8&akid=174743.35566440. uaJTJi 2. "'It's Like a Powder Keg That's Going to Explode,'" Politico Magazine, December 11, 2016
http://act.moveon.org/go/7135?t=10&akid=174743.35566440. uaJTJi 3. "Donald Trump delays announcement on separation from business ties," CBS News, December 12, 2016
http://act.moveon.org/go/7140?t=12&akid=174743.35566440. uaJTJi 4. "GOP elector: Not all of us are voting for Trump," The Hill, December 9, 2016
http://act.moveon.org/go/7137?t=14&akid=174743.35566440. uaJTJi 5. "Bipartisan Electors Ask James Clapper: Release Facts on Outside Interference in U.S. Election," Extra Newsfeed, December 12, 2016
https://act.moveon.org/go/7138?t=16&akid=174743. 35566440.uaJTJi 6. "Tweet by Jim Himes," December 11, 2016
https://act.moveon.org/go/7139?t=18&akid=174743. 35566440.uaJTJi 7. "The Electoral College Was Created to Stop Demagogues Like Trump," Time, November 17, 2016
http://act.moveon.org/go/7141?t=20&akid=174743.35566440. uaJTJi 8. "Virginian-Pilot editorial: Russia's influence in election needs strong inquiry," The Virginian-Pilot, December 12, 2016
http://act.moveon.org/go/7148?t=22&akid=174743.35566440. uaJTJi Want to support our work? The MoveOn community will work every moment, day by day and year by year, to resist Trump's agenda, contain the damage, defeat hate with love, and begin the process of swinging the nation's pendulum back toward sanity, decency, and the kind of future that we must never give up on. And to do it we need your support, now more than ever. Will you stand with us?
Click here to chip in $3, or whatever you can afford.
![]()
PAID FOR BY MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION, http://pol.moveon.org/. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
![]()
This email was sent to Justin Krebs on December 14th, 2016. To change your email address or update your contact info, click here. To remove yourself from this list, click here.
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (1) |