I've finally achieved consistency in my life. Any person of average or above intelligence can predict what I will say next with unerring accuracy. And what I say will always be wrong.

Thursday, December 11, 2014

[ITSALLABOUTMEMAN] Paint By Numbers! [1 Attachment]

 
[Attachment(s) from matt love included below]

Now you can make an image just like Oliver Age 24!

__._,_.___

Attachment(s) from matt love | View attachments on the web

1 of 1 Photo(s)


Posted by: matt love <mattlove1@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

Check out the automatic photo album with 1 photo(s) from this topic.
Mona Lisa.bmp


.

__,_._,___

Tuesday, December 09, 2014

[ITSALLABOUTMEMAN] Re: Should Elizabeth Warren run for president?

 

No, no, no, no, no, goddammit.  She represents no departure from Reagan / Bush / Clinton / Bush / Obama. She already espouses a reactionary foreign policy, and all she ever talks about domestically is the middle class. Are the poor the third rail in this country now? 

Go Green, and forget about all those reactionary Democrats, that what I say to you, Ilya Sheyman of MoveOn.Org.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Ilya Sheyman, MoveOn.org Political Action <moveon-help@list.moveon.org> wrote:
It was a grassroots, people-driven "draft Warren" movement that convinced Elizabeth Warren to run in 2012.

Dear MoveOn member,

Should MoveOn encourage Senator Elizabeth Warren to run for president?

Launching an effort like this is a decision so important that it can only be made by MoveOn members like you. This email is your ballot. Voting starts now.

Here's why this idea is on the table: This moment was made for Elizabeth Warren. We're at a crossroads in American history, with inequality soaring to levels not seen since the 1920s and an economic playing field rigged to favor Wall Street and corporate interests. Inequality, and the corrupting political power of big money, threatens to undermine every issue we hold dear—from climate change to racial justice, from student debt to the fate of Social Security.

And in the midst of all that, we hear the voice of Elizabeth Warren—rallying the nation with her transformative vision of giving everyone a fighting chance.

After listening closely to MoveOn members for the last several months, we've come to believe that Warren's powerful voice is needed right now on the nation's biggest stage—the 2016 race for president.

Warren's not in the race yet. But there's a precedent here: She was inspired to run for Senate in 2012 by a people-powered "Draft Warren" campaign. This fall, when asked by People magazine whether she might be on board for a run at the presidency, she answered, "If there's any lesson I've learned in the last five years, it's don't be so sure about what lies ahead. There are amazing doors that could open."1

It's up to us to help open that door. If we join our voices together, if we show her a groundswell of support, if our millions-strong community can make clear to Warren that if she runs, she'll have the grassroots army she needs to not only win a primary, to not only win the White House, but to create real change for middle-class Americans who urgently need help—then we believe she can be persuaded to run.

We think she can win. And even if she doesn't, we believe that a contested primary is best for everyone—for the eventual nominee, for the progressive movement, and for the country.

MoveOn is its members. This decision rests in your hands. As we have with all of our biggest decisions, we're putting this question to a vote.

Voting starts now, and closes at 9 a.m. ET/6 PT on Wednesday, December 10. Cast your official ballot by clicking below: Should MoveOn launch a major effort calling on Elizabeth Warren to run for president?

Yes, MoveOn should encourage Sen. Elizabeth Warren to run for president.

No, MoveOn should not do this.

If MoveOn members do vote to move forward, we'll go to bat to demonstrate to Senator Warren that if she runs, we'll be right there with her. We'll show her that Americans are hungry for a leader who is unafraid to stand up to the megabanks and corporate interests, and who will never stop fighting for families on the ragged edge of the middle class.

Our campaign would be called "Run Warren Run," and it would be 100% positive: lifting up the case for a Warren candidacy, not pulling anyone down.

Above all, it would be based on the belief that we need all our best candidates in the race. The 2008 primary ensured that President Obama was battle-tested by the time he reached the general election. And if it weren't for Hillary Clinton and John Edwards calling for health care reform in the primary, we may never have gotten the Affordable Care Act that millions of Americans rely on today. A contested primary means that progressives have a voice, the best ideas get an airing, and the eventual nominee is ready to face the best (or worst) that the Republicans and the Koch brothers have to offer.

That's what we've heard from countless MoveOn members. And it's why MoveOn's staff believes it's so important for Elizabeth Warren to enter the race. But now it's up to you.

Do you agree? Should MoveOn launch a "Run Warren Run" campaign encouraging her to enter the race?

Yes, MoveOn should launch a campaign encouraging Sen. Elizabeth Warren to run for president.

No, MoveOn should not do this.

Again, voting will remain open until 9 a.m. ET/6 PT on Wednesday, December 10. All MoveOn members are eligible to vote. Only your first click will be recorded, so please take care in making your choice. 

Thanks for all you do.

–Ilya, Anna, Ben, Mark, and the rest of the team

Source:

1. "An Early Halloween Fright for Wall St.: Elizabeth Warren for Treasury Secretary?" People, October 22, 2014 
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=301987&id=105671-19284091-74YXT2x&t=3

Want to support our work? We're entirely funded by our 8 million members—no corporate contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. Start a monthly donation here or chip in a one-time donation here.


PAID FOR BY MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION, http://pol.moveon.org/. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. This email was sent to Matt Love on December 9, 2014. To change your email address or update your contact info, click here. To remove yourself from this list, click here.

__._,_.___

Posted by: matt love <mattlove1@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

Sunday, December 07, 2014

[ITSALLABOUTMEMAN] Shocking story!

 

Another comment on NPR's website I think probably won't survive long.  Glad that free speech prevails here in Mattloveland.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2014/11/10/363018121/open-forum?uidt=1417975250#commentBlock

Matt Love
 

Are there any actual journalists left at NPR? Do the employees silently suffer, or are they happy to dish out the official story? It's interesting that 7 years ago, NPR took an interest in some nasty business in Arazona involving Resolution Copper and politicians: "Congressman Rick Renzi Inquiry Continues
All Things Considered
May 14, 2007
Congressman Rick Renzi is under federal investigation in
connection with his alleged involvement in a questionable land-swap
deal. The Arizona Republican stepped down from the House Intelligence
Committee after FBI agents descended on his family business. He says he
has no intention of resigning from Congress. By Ted Robbins"

http://www.npr.org/templates/s...

But is currently ignoring a much worse situation: http://rt.com/usa/211531-nativ...

Do they fear McCain's cloud? Do they think he might be their boss some day? Real journalists would surely be upset that they were scooped by a foreign propaganda outfit on a story like this - but propagandists would just shrug and say "That's got nothign to do with us. Our job is to try to make Putin and Kim Jong Un look bad." I'm very curious to know which it is.

__._,_.___

Posted by: matt love <mattlove1@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

[ITSALLABOUTMEMAN] More stupid nonsense on NPR

 

I don't know how long my comment will be allowed to stay, it almost certainly violates one community guideline or another, so I repost it here.

Read the dumber than dumb story at http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2014/12/04/368449855/north-koreas-cyber-skills-get-attention-amid-sony-hacking-mystery

and then read my comments below:

Matt Love a minute ago

What a hilarious statement: ""North Koreans do not have an independent world of art and entertainment. And so they don't separate propaganda from entertainment. So it's very difficult for them to understand that the U.S. and many
other countries have a completely independent world that's called Hollywood," Boy, talk about evidence of a colonized mind, here it is. She says all this without a trace of irony. Never noticing how our government, citizenry, propaganda and entertainment media all march in lockstep in mocking and demonizing the same select targets. The US may never mount an invasion of North Korea, but it's all set up for one. You know who the next intended victim of the US will be - they show up in the National Enquirer in a dress in a photoshopped picture. Noriega, Saddam, Gaddafi, it's so predictable, but like Charlie Brown and the football, the public lines up for it again and again, and NPR is the National Enquirer of the 'people who like to think they are thinking people' class. Here in the US where we have an independent world of art and entertainment, of course, they produce slapstick comedies about assassinating American politicians, because they are so independent and stuff. Grow up, people! Wouldn't it be great if people in think tanks actually tried thinking for a change?


__._,_.___

Posted by: matt love <mattlove1@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

[ITSALLABOUTMEMAN] NPR is Fox for people who like to think they are better than everybody else

 

Take this bit of rubbish,and the idiot response by their simpleton viewers:


http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2014/02/27/283464503/seth-rogen-tees-off-on-senators-who-walked-out-on-his-testimony?uidt=1417963868#commentBlock

Seth Rogen Tees Off On Senators Who Walked Out On His Testimony

February 27, 2014 5:43 PM ET

People don't raise the possibility that the Senators don't like being lectured by celebrities, especially a vulgarian like this one, any more than normal people. For that, who could blame them?

People don't like to hear how their criminal conduct kills people, either, but I wish our government would act responsibly, and change, so their failure to show up at this hearing (which didn't bother the stenographers at NPR in the slightest) is much greater cause for dismay and despair: 

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/11/malala-nabila-worlds-apart-201311193857549913.html

However, despite overcoming incredible obstacles in order to travel from their remote village to the United States, Nabila and her family were roundly ignored. At the congressional hearing where they gave testimony, only five out of 430 representatives showed up. In the words of Nabila's father to those few who did attend"My daughter does not have the face of a terrorist and neither did my mother. It just doesn't make sense to me, why this happened… as a teacher, I wanted to educate Americans and let them know my children have been injured."

Its just about impossible to educate Americans about anything (and their junior partners in their global jehad, the British) they are incapable of listening.  Consider this piece from the generally well-meaing Guardian:  http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/29/pakistan-family-drone-victim-testimony-congress


The headline reads: "Drone strikes: tears in Congress as Pakistani family tells of mother's death" which is heartening, but in the actual story, it reveals that it was the translator that was crying, not the pathetically small contingent of lawbreakers that showed up at the gig (the puny size of the audience is buried in the article. 

This does not stop ignorant facist loyal Muricans like 'Bulldoggy' from fantisizing that this is all some publicity stunt stage managed by our congress who he imagines are trying to limit our executive death squad's ability to kill without restrant or remorse:

20 21

To be fair then Congress should hear testimony from surviving family members of the 15,000+ 2012 deaths worldwide at the hands of Islamist fundamentalists, mostly AQ and Taliban.

What an absolute waste of minerals. No wonder So many people around the globe hate Americans, when this is what this benighted country always leads with.

__._,_.___

Posted by: matt love <mattlove1@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___