I've finally achieved consistency in my life. Any person of average or above intelligence can predict what I will say next with unerring accuracy. And what I say will always be wrong.

Saturday, December 08, 2007

[CanYoAssDigIt] Who would have thought a guy who married Madonna would turn out to be so smart?

Then again, he was smart enough to get out before she turned him into a coat!



 

The Constitution, the Media and Kucinich

 

Piano Wire Puppeteers

 

By SEAN PENN

 

It's been an odd week. For me, a particularly odd week. But that's another story. So, wait a minute. Iran DOESN'T have nuclear weapon capability??? So, who are we gonna bomb? I want to bomb somebody!

Didn't Senator Clinton just vote in essence to give President Bush the power to bomb Iran? If he had done it last week, would that have made her right? I mean, if she knew then what she knows now? Or am I getting that backward? Golly, I'm confused.

And what about President Bush? This week, Vladimir Putin, the man Mr. Bush said he "Looked into the eyes of and found to be very straightforward and trustworthy." So much so, he was "able to get a sense of his soul." Well that soulful fella has just successfully coalesced the most dangerous power base in Russia since the Cold War amid rumors that include allegations he ordered the assassinations of journalists and imprisonment of noted proponents of freedom (Oops).

Meanwhile, our President's great enemy in Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, that "totalitarian," "authoritarian," "dictator," that "mad man run amok," somehow was unsuccessful in his bid for the constitutional reforms that would have allowed him to be repeatedly re-elected for life…Hmmm?

Odd week, you know? Really.

What happened to Chavez's "strong-arming?" His "electoral corruption?" His alleged "gagging of the press?" How in the hell could he have lost? I'm sorry, did I miss something?

How is it that this "Commie bastard" with 80% of his citizens having elected him in the first place was unable to prevail? Could it be that we've been lied to about him? I mean, Pat Robertson's not a liar, is he? His god wouldn't let that happen, would he? And god-forbid, our god would let the right-wing pundits, left-wing corporates, or our own administration send us a bill of goods!?

Is it possible, I mean I know it's silly, but is it just a little bit possible that President Chavez is in fact a defender of his people's Constitution? That, that's how his referendum could fail? And that that's why he accepted it with such grace? A constitution which I have read several times. Quite a beautiful document, not dissimilar to our own. You might give it a read. Oh, I forgot – he's a "drug runner."

Let me share something with you. Late one night in Caracas, I met with a couple of fellas, mercenaries I think you call them. Goddamit, I keep doing that. I mean "contractors." They were Brits, their specialty: drug interdiction. These two were no great fans of Chavez. They called him "radical" and expected him to fall to an assassin's bullet within the year. Like him or not, he had the cash to win their acceptance of his employ. And working alongside the Venezuelan military, these two, based in Caracas, had played the mountainous and jungled border between Columbia and Venezuela. A zone rife with paramilitaries, FARC guerillas, and mer…scratch that, contractors. What I was told that evening in Caracas by these piano wire puppeteers was that they had never worked for a government whose investment in drug interdiction was so genuine. "Yeah," said one of the Brits, "I gotta give the bastard Chavez that."

But I was talking about the Constitution. Most importantly, our own. And what an odd week it has been. Our culture is engrained with a tradition that blurs the line between what is right, what is just and what is constitutional, with what is a scam. That tradition is the cult of personality. What can TV sell, what kind of crap will we buy. And at what point are we buying and selling our rights, our pride, our flag, our children, and succumbing to meaningless slogans that are ultimately pure titles for un-Americanism. How do we know what's American and what is not? Because John Wayne tells us so? Because Sean Penn tells us so? Susan Sarandon? Bill O'Reilly? Michael Moore? Senator Bull? Or Senator Shit? Ann "my bowel expenditure" Coulter? No. It's our Constitution. We don't use it just to win. We depend on it because it's the only "us" worth being. And because it's our children's inheritance from our shared forefathers and the traditions that really do speak best of our country.

So, here's the question. We got Iowa coming up, we got New Hampshire right on its ass. Do we sell it for electability? If Hitler were the only candidate, would voting for him be most American? Jump on a plane with me. Okay, we're over the Middle East now…Let's land. Take a deep breath.

Imagine the bodies, burned and mutilated, the concussive sounds of gunfire and explosives defining the last horrifying moments of the dying and the dead. Imagine the millions of refugees fleeing through the deserts of Iraq, the babies crying, and the stench of death in the air. Yuck. Let's get back on the plane and head home.

Now, imagine American servicemen dead or broken, returning from a broken military to a silent casket or a broken veteran's administration, to broken lives and broken businesses, broken wives, unspoken husbands, and devastated children. And what for? What have we gained?

Al-Qaida recruitment is up. Terrorism is up. Quality of life is down in our country and around the world. While the rich continue to get richer and the poor, poorer and more numerous. And on the verge of recession, we are witnessing the dramatic disassembling of the middle class amidst a flood of foreclosures and unpayable debts. To Osama Bin Laden's infinite delight, we have become a country of principle breakers rather than principle bearers.

We are torturers and we too often, imprison only the weak. When our own administration chooses its bewilderingly un-American agenda (For the entitled people? By the entitled people?) over the Constitution in defining American values, principles, and law, Bin Laden laughs at the weakened sheep that we and our representatives have become.

High crimes and misdemeanors? How about full-blown treason for the outing our own CIA operatives? How about full-blown treason for those who support this administration through media propaganda?

While I'm not a proponent of the Death Penalty, existing law provides that the likes of Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld and Rice, if found guilty, could have hoods thrown over their heads, their hands bound, facing a 12-man rifle corps executing death by firing squad. And our cowardly democratically dominated House and Senate can barely find one voice willing to propose so much as an impeachment. That one voice of a true American. That one voice of Congressman Dennis Kucinich.

This is not going to be a sound bite. Not if I can help it. I'm torn. I'm torn between the conventional wisdom of what we all keep being told is electibility and the idealism that perhaps alone can live up to the challenges of our generation. Of the democrats running for President, only Congressman Dennis Kucinich's candidacy is backed by a voting record of moral courage and a history of service to our country that has fully earned our support and our gratitude. And when I say support, I am not speaking to democrats alone, but rather to every American who would take the time on behalf of their children, our planet, and our soldiers to educate themselves on the Kucinich platform.

In the recent debate among Democrats in Las Vegas, the candidates, one after the other, placed security ahead of human rights. Benjamin Franklin once said "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." Then, there was good ole Patrick Henry. Remember him? "Give me liberty, or give me death." These were the real tough bastards. The real John Wayne's.

These are the traditions we should be serving. I found the debate infuriating, nearly an argument for fascism with few exceptions, key among them Dennis Kucinich. Of course as a strategic politician, Mrs. Clinton pulled out her set of Ginzu knives and dominated once again on "centrist" political strategy. In fending off attacks upon she, the front runner, she reminded the audience and her fellow candidates, "We are all Democrats."

Wolf Blitzer asked each candidate if they would support the other should they themselves not be the nominee. One after another, the answer, yes. One exception: Dennis Kucinich, who with the minimal time allotted him, once again rose up beyond the sound bite and put principal ahead of party; argued policy rather than politeness. He has been the dominant voice of integrity on issues of trade, labor, education, environment, health, civil liberties, and the one endlessly determined voice of peace.

But is he too short? Does his haircut not appeal? Is he not loyal enough to a cowardly democratic platform? Does he not appeal to the cult of personality? And what if the answer is yes? What if Dennis Kucinich, the most deserving and noble of candidates, the most experienced in issues of policy and the least willing to play into the politics of personal power? What if we can't elect a man simply on the basis of the best ideas, the most courage, and the most selfless service? What does it say about our country when we can't rally the voices of the common good to support a man, like our troops, who would die for us, who would die for our constitution? Who, as mayor of Cleveland at the age of 31 stood up against contracts on his life. Three separate assassins whose intent was to kill him as he stood up for his constituency there.

Nonetheless, he carries on. He continues to serve.

I've been a supporter of Dennis Kucinich for several years. And I've been torn lately. I've been torn by the allure of "electability." I began to invest some support in a very good man (one among Dennis's opponents) who seems to be finding himself as a constitutional defender, but he's not one yet. He is however, among those that we allow the media to distinguish as electable. But we're talking about the Constitution here. We're talking about our country. I have decided not to participate in proactive support on the basis of media distinctions. I have chosen to pledge my support to the singular, strongest and most proven representative of our constitutional mandate.

Dennis Kucinich offers us a very singular opportunity as we share this minute of time on earth. We, the people. It is for us to determine what is electable. And here's how simple it is: If we, those of us who truly believe in the Constitution of the United States of America, all of us, vote for Dennis Kucinich, he will be elected. Could we call him electable then? If so, America will stand taller than ever.

Let's remind our friends in the social circles of New York and the highbrow winner-friendly and monied major cities that support Mrs. Clinton, that this is not Bill Clinton. For all the misgivings I have about our former President, he raised up friends and opposition alike, his great gift as a motivator of interest and activism, of self-education and participation was, on its own merits, a unique gift. But don't underestimate personal agendas, those that initiated NAFTA, betrayed Haitian refugees and gay rights in the military within a minute of his own election. Don't underestimate that part of him when he gives his wife the face of his talent. Don't underestimate the damage her poisonous ambition can do to this country. We can't wait for the benefit of hindsight to service the benefit of Mrs. Clinton's career.

Let's raise up men and women of vision, of integrity, of belief in our principles. How exciting would that be to do? How good would that be for television? What if we turned this game around? Imagine watching on television, our country raising up a leader because he represents our Constitution.

Yes, good things can be good TV.

So, let's give the Constitution another read, shall we? And then decide who its greatest defender would be. I suggest that Republicans, Independents, and Democrats alike will find that they know what's really right in their hearts and minds.

Sean Penn's latest film is Into the Wild.


__._,_.___
Best of Y! Groups

Discover groups

that are the best

of their class.

Endurance Zone

A Yahoo! Group

Learn how to

increase endurance.

Fitness Challenge

on Yahoo! Groups

Get in shape w/the

Special K Challenge.

.

__,_._,___

Friday, December 07, 2007

[CanYoAssDigIt] Canadian Radio Rocks

Today Jian Ghomeshi interviewed Nic Harcourt of KCRW's Morning Becomes Eclectic - .  He introduced him with a big fat buildup praising NPR, PRI, and KEXP, among many other unworthies. I had to speak out, thus destroying any hope of any influence or connection in the future. I felt it should be done.  The US is a spent force.  Everywhere I look - Canada, Brazil, The Philippines, China, Vietnam - exciting and vital stuff is breaking out. The US is a museum.  A museum where pinheads are tossing things into the trash and the shredder as fast as they can, and selling off a priceless heritage as scrap.

http://www.cbc.ca/q/

Jeez Jian, it's nice of you to give props to the radio down south, but misguided.  There is more good radio in Edmonton than there is in the entire country of the US.  That lousy station in Seattle was a nice little student station at the U of W before Paul Allen bought it (how that happened I'll never understand) and turned it into an advertisement for another public/private enterprise of his, the hideous and gross EMP. Seattle is under then thumb of the microsoft creeps.

NPR was pivital in my decision to move to Canada, and if you are interested (which I very much doubt) I'll tell you that story. NPR, PRI, APR - all are now part of the propaganda model that dominates (comprises?) american media now - scarcely preferable to Fox or CNN. 

The only good radio in the states is Amy Goodman's Democracy Now! and some of the programming on WFMU www.wfmu.org/ who have done a remarkable job of surviving seperation from a university (in their case, closure), in much the same way as CKUA. 

I know you are a musician.  So am I. I tell you, music isn't so important. It's a narcotic, and Morning Becomes Eclectic is just an opiate to lull people will the US goes down the toilet.  If you want to do something worthwhile, interview Amy Goodman, she's a amazing.  Talk to Greg Palast about how he's been edged out of NPR.  Or Noam Chomsky - there is a starding order, Chomsky is not to be interviewed or mentioned (unless the context is linguistics).

Thank God for the internet - before I moved here, it was the only thing that saved me.

__._,_.___
Moderator Central

Get answers to

your questions about

running Y! Groups.

Athletic Edge

A Yahoo! Group

to connect w/ others

about fitness goals.

Move More

on Yahoo! Groups

This is your life

not a phys-ed class.

.

__,_._,___

Thursday, December 06, 2007

[CanYoAssDigIt] US to invade Edmonton

So the US invaded Afghanistan and Iraq so that Muslim women there wouldn't have to wear  hijabs any more?  Never mind that they didn't have to in Iraq before, and few did, but plenty do now, thanks to the predicable rise in religious fundamentalism following the destruction of Iraqi society and infrastructure.

Well, here in Edmonton, they won't allow Muslim school girls to play soccer with  hijabs.  They claim the decision is for reasons of safety. Did the girls tear off their scarves?  No, they are staying on the sidelines and appealing the decision, speaking with an intelligence and articulation that puts virtually 100% of the lowbrows arguing on the issue on the Internet (particularly on the Ultrazine list).  They have demanded to know of one person who has ever been injured playing soccer while wearing a hijab.  They have not received a response.

There is only one solution.  The Canadian wimps have not gone far enough.  The US military must invade Canada, forcefully removing those hijabs, maybe raping and murdering the girls while they are at it. That is, of course, part of their job. To destroy in order to save.

And take all the oil in Alberta, too while they are at it.

And then they should liberate orthodox Jewish men and Catholic nuns from their oppressive head coverings as well.  Especially if they have something worth stealing.

__._,_.___
Moderator Central

Yahoo! Groups

Get the latest news

from the team.

Parenting Zone

on Yahoo! Groups

Your one stop for

parenting groups.

Best of Y! Groups

Discover groups

that are the best

of their class.

.

__,_._,___

[CanYoAssDigIt] Is there anything to be learned from this?

I stumbled across this by accident:

http://www.slugsite.com/archives/137

Germain Vigeant, 1985-2006

It's not the fall that kills, it's the sudden stop at the bottom, as Germain Juliette Vigeant may have discovered. While there's a pretty nice view to be had from atop the Bunge elevators, it's not a view worth dieing for.


The More We Get Together, The Happier We'll Be

The late Germain Vigeant had a profile on MySpace, linked above. Seems to have been a "live fast, die young, and leave a good-looking corpse" kind of person. Well, I guess she achieved two out of three.

Pretty much I like to kick it with my pally wals, get way too drunk, and fuck shit up.

Hope you're in a happier place now, Germain.



Her profile is still on myspace. I sent a friend request.  I hope I don't get a response...

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=10046888

photos
In this photo:  
I'll get a better pic up soon......hopefully



Listing 1 - 2 of 2
From Comment
jen



29 Jan 2006 23:05
RIP, my brother loved the shit out of you .
you were good shit.
jen

Practice perfect



29 Jan 2006 20:48
I'm gonna miss you So much!!! I love your heart, you were such a great person who only wanted to make people smile!! which you did with ease!!! Thank you for being my friend!!! I've always thought you were amazeing!!!

I send you my love!!!! :*-(
Goodbye

__._,_.___
Moderator Central

Yahoo! Groups

Get the latest news

from the team.

Yahoo! Groups

Find Green Groups

Share with others

Help the Planet.

Shedding Pounds

on Yahoo! Groups

Read sucess stories

& share your own.

.

__,_._,___

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: Think you're a Guitar Hero?

I don't think I'm a guitar hero, I KNOW I am a guitar hero. I am your new god, little boy. I unleash the fucking fury every time I play.  End of discussion.


On Dec 5, 2007 11:41 PM, Tickle Newsletter <newsletter@tickle-inc.com> wrote:
Hi Matt!
Spotlight!
Best holiday tradition?
 Classic Tickle

What's Your Travel Temptation?

Want to sail away?

What's Your Stress Style?

Don't freak out — find out!

Who's Your Inner Rock Star?

Find out how you rock out!
 Horoscope
For a peek at what the stars have in store for you, check out your horoscope.
Aries - Taurus - Gemini - Cancer - Leo - Virgo - Libra - Scorpio - Sagittarius - Capricorn - Aquarius - Pisces

Keep things in perspective — and take a well-earned break — with a free sample Daily Grind tarot reading at Astrology.com.
What's Hot?

What's Your Video Game Match?

Press start!

How Will You Survive Christmas?

It's not too early to figure it out!

What's Your Holiday Wish?

Want something special in your stocking?
Would you rather:
Have hair on your palms
Have hair on your gums
This email was sent to matt.mattlove1@gmail.com. Make sure you keep receiving your Tickle newsletter by adding newsletter@tickle-inc.com to your address book. For assistance or to send us your comments, do not reply to this email; visit Customer Care. If you would like to unsubscribe, click here.

Home | About Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Us | Advertise | Help | Take Fun Tests Tickle Inc., 222 Sutter Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
© 2006 Tickle Inc. All rights reserved.



__._,_.___
Yahoo! Groups

Get info and support

on Samsung HDTVs

and devices.

Moderator Central

Get answers to

your questions about

running Y! Groups.

Endurance Zone

on Yahoo! Groups

Groups about

better endurance.

.

__,_._,___

[CanYoAssDigIt] Fwd: Google Alert - Ishtar The Movie

Google News Alert for: Ishtar The Movie

Charlie Wilson Loses The War
Pajamas Media - El Segundo,CA,USA
It would be exaggerating only slightly to call it The Congressional Record meets "Ishtar." How strange is this film? So strange that there aren't really any ...
See all stories on this topic


I hate moderated blogs.  I tried to submit a comment on this piece... on the "Submit your comment" field, they said "Comments are not routinely moderated, and we therefore can not be responsible for their content. However, we do occasionally read them, and we may delete offensive or off-topic comments."

But when you actually do submit one, you get this message:

Thank you for commenting.

Your comment has been received and is held for approval."


Here is the piece I tried to comment on:


Charlie Wilson Loses His War

December 5, 2007 12:31 AM

Charlie Wilson's War is entertaining - but not in a good way, writes film critic Kyle Smith. He gives the "historically suspect" and "dramatically aimless" film written by The West Wing's Aaron Sorkin —which opens on Dec. 25— only 2.5 stars out of 4.

By Kyle Smith

I somewhat enjoyed "Charlie Wilson's War," but I'm glad I don't have any money invested in it. It would be exaggerating only slightly to call it The Congressional Record meets "Ishtar."

How strange is this film? So strange that there aren't really any stakes for the main character. So strange that pages and pages of dialogue float by trying to convince you to care whether the 1981 covert ops budget for aid to Afghanistan's mujahideen fighting the invading Soviets was $10 million or $40 million, or how many T-55 tanks the Soviet invaders used. So strange that Democrats are shown killing Commies. Not calling for sanctions against them; not filing paperwork against them in the U.N.; not calling for investigations of how their prisoners of war were treated: just getting them in the crosshairs, and pow.

Tom Hanks, doing a low Elvis drawl, plays the real-life Texas Congressman Charlie Wilson, who at first appears to be the usual Hollywood parody of Southern lawmakers. He's a degenerate who snorts coke (though not onscreen; this is the actor, or rather the brand, Tom Hanks we're talking about). He consorts with strippers in hot tubs and staffs his Washington office with heaving cleavage he refers to as "jailbait."

But screenwriter Aaron Sorkin plants an early scene in which Wilson refuses to defend a creche on municipal property, which clues us in: Wilson is a secular Democrat, which in a Hollywood political film means heroic. So his Bubba-ness—"You can teach 'em how to type, but you can't teach 'em how to grow tits," is one of his aphorisms—is meant to be a charming quirk, not a sign of a diseased soul as it would be in a screen version of a conservative lawmaker.

A lot of Sorkin's lines are funny: "I'm on the other side of that issue," says Charlie. "Ethics?" is the response. Yet the movie generates only scattered laughs. Hanks' mumbling tends to dampen the jokes, and it's a habit picked up by Philip Seymour Hoffman as an abrasive but savvy CIA man transferred to Langley's Afghanistan desk as the Soviets are invading in 1980.

For all of his one-liners, Charlie truly cares both about dealing a blow to the Soviets and about the suffering of the Afghans under Soviet domination. So he cooks up a scheme to help the mujahideen, and in some of the movie's best scenes Sorkin's trademark rapid-fire dialogue explains how: Wilson can't just send American weapons. He needs weapons that could plausibly have been captured from the Soviets. Israel has just such a cache of confiscated weapons, but that would mean putting Israel and the Muslim countries on the same side of the covert war. Meanwhile, Charlie is getting support in the bank, and in bed, from a friend described as both an extreme right winger and "the 6th-richest woman in Texas" (Julia Roberts), a fund-raiser and party-thrower who hates Commies and loves Jesus in equal measure.

What's lively and fresh about the film is that it feels truer than most Washington movies, which tend to portray politicians as either scoundrels or steely-eyed heroes. Director Mike Nichols, who made "Primary Colors," presents a D.C. where smart and well-meaning people, some of them slobs in cheap suits, do the best they can considering competing forces.

But the film is historically suspect—why is there hardly a mention of Ronald Reagan? And it's dramatically aimless. As Hanks and Roberts and their jokes hop from Cairo to Houston to Islamabad, the movie at times seems like many another tiresome international caper that mistook frequent-flier mileage for a storyline. For every sharp one-liner, there's a paragraph of detail-clogged pedantry about the process.

The movie would not have been made were it not for the moral in its closing minutes: American adventures overseas can have unpredictable effects. Sorkin makes the point nicely, with a tale about a zen master, but being clever and being right are two different things. Sorkin all but says that a few million U.S. bucks for schools in Afghanistan after the Soviet war would have prevented 9/11; yet the U.S. for decades has done everything for Saudi Arabia but send it flowers on Mother's Day. None of our efforts prevented that rancid kingdom from nursing most of the 9/11 hijackers.

Kyle Smith is a film critic for the the New York Post. His website is at www.kylesmithonline.com.

And here is my comment which may or may not be posted:

 

"It would be exaggerating only slightly to call it The Congressional Record meets 'Ishtar.'" So it's a cross between something really dull, and something really great?  So it ends up in the middle, like, say, Top Gun?

RE: Saudi Arabia - how could helping the emir gild his dome prevent an uprising from the people who have never seen a refrigerator? Maybe the problem is that people in the US (particularly the bush league president) prefer movies like Top Gun to Ishtar.

But things are looking up, and I predict really big things coming up for Ishtar... there is a documentary film about Ishtar fandom in the works, the manager of the Ishtar fan website (http://www.ishtarthemovie.com/) is putting together a tribute CD featuring cover versions of songs from the movie, and possibly a US release on DVD (something the heathen in Europe have been enjoying for years). So shake off that square world, get with the countdown, and blast off to Ishtar!

http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/ILoveIshtar/

http://www.waitingforishtar.com/

http://www.ishtarthemovie.com/


__._,_.___
Moderator Central

Get answers to

your questions about

running Y! Groups.

Parenting Groups

on Yahoo! Groups

Single Parenting

to managing twins.

Yahoo! Groups

Special K Challenge

Learn how others are

shedding the pounds.

.

__,_._,___