I've finally achieved consistency in my life. Any person of average or above intelligence can predict what I will say next with unerring accuracy. And what I say will always be wrong.

Thursday, February 02, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: [Leslie_Morris_Online] September 11th.

Lez doesn't. I do. Some others on this list are at least
entertaining the idea, but I would go so far as to put some money on
it right now. Any takers?

I remember when I was at community college, there was this woman there
involved in student government. I was working on the student newspaper
and interviewed her for a profile. Her story was astonishing. She had
modeled professionally, she had such an incredible history. I thought
she was lying too. I of course had some useful visual information in
that case - SHE WAS VERY PLAIN.

In that instance, everybody else who heard her story was skeptical
too, but we were polite and held our tongues. it was a small school,
and we had to get along for a year or two together.

In this case, I'm half a world away, so I can say whatever the hell I
want, and you can call me heartless, abusive, blaming the victim, or
whatever, and I can shrug it off, or if I'm feeling thin-skinned that
day, I can simply leave the list.

I've seen people make extraordinary claims of amazing achievements, or
incredible abuse. people made a name for themselves in my semi-famous
little town by saying that they'd been tortured by satanists - or
Satan himself. To question the stories no matter how implausible (or
even ludicrous) was despicable - heartless, abusive, blaming the
victim...

It's an interesting coincidence that this Ofelia has the same name as
one of the prime role models for the Fin de Siècle fashionable ladies
with the chic tubercular pallor.

In conclusion, why do I think she was lying? Because I've seen her
around. A lot.

Now, if anybody is interested, I can tell the absolutely true story of
how my band opened for Nirvana once. And you will believe it, because
it sounds like a true story. Because it is.

On 2/1/06, Simon Wilkinson <womby02@hotmail.com> wrote:
> why do you think she's a liar, Lez?
>
>
> >From: Matt Love <matt.mattlove1@gmail.com>
> >Reply-To: Leslie_Morris_Online@yahoogroups.com
> >To: Leslie_Morris_Online@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: Re: [Leslie_Morris_Online] September 11th.
> >Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:02:25 -0800
> >
> >My wife once had a long train ride with a pathological liar. Seems
> >he'd been everywhere and done everything. He was only 26, yet he'd
> >been a motivational speaker for Mothers Against Drunk Drivers for over
> >a decade. Owned 10 coffee shops. Had condos in several cities. Just
> >left Seattle where he had bought another one. Why was he on the train
> >instead of a Mercedes? Maybe he was running away from something.
> >After one whopper too many, my wife asked him "has anybody ever
> >compared you to Forrest Gump?" to the total delight of another rider
> >who had been constantly one upped by the young and troubled genius.
> >
> >Next time you see her, ask Ofelia "Has anybody ever compared yo to
> >Forrest Gump?"
> >
> >Let us know what she said.
> >
> >On 1/28/06, Leslie Morris <dr_spider_man@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Yesterday I took Holly to get a beer. He's going to be separated
> > > for his girlfriend for a few months. So I've been trying to distract
> > > him. We ended up taking a new housemate. An Irish girl named Ofelia.
> > > We started to chat to her. She seemed interesting. She is a super
> > > genius. At the age of 3 she taught herself to read and write in two
> > > languages. She holds 10 degree. But she's a little unsure as she
> > > hasn't counted them in a while. She has lived all around the world.
> > > She has been a model, ballerina, been in some films, did a lot of
> > > theatre and is only 26. She came to Australia to start her new life.
> > > My first question is why the fuck are you living in a Petersham? She
> > > said she was running away from something. I suggested that Holly and
> > > I should guess. She said we would never be able to guess. But we
> > > tried anyway. Now at this point of the conversation the tone was
> > > very jovial and light hearted. She gave us some hints. It was about
> > > 4 years ago and she was living in New York at the time. I said `You
> > > running away from the Homosexual Broadway Mafia'. She laughed and
> > > replied `No'. Then I said it was some kind of Cabbage conspiracy and
> > > went to describe how she became the Cabbage Queen of Harlem. That
> > > was also incorrect. Then I said `Hmmm… did you cause September 11?'
> > > I saw a change in her eye. Holy Shit!!! (I constantly feel like a
> > > child in an adult costume.) She then went on to tell us she was she
> > > wanted to enroll in the Academy of Film in New York and her Father
> > > wanted her to be a banker. She was going over to the World Trade
> > > Center that morning to have breakfast and make up with him. She got
> > > a frantic phone call from him and then she was crushed by another
> > > building. Then was found 3 days later when everyone was thought
> > > dead. Then she threw though horrific list of things that have
> > > happened to her since. I felt like shit and apologized. The moral of
> > > this story? I don't know?
> > >
> > > For the rest of the time she tried to crack on to Con. Con wasn't
> > > interested. But that has nothing to do with Ofelia. We're pretty
> > > certain that Con he's gay.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >
> > > Visit your group "Leslie_Morris_Online" on the web.
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Leslie_Morris_Online-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: [Bizarro_UltraZine] "Valley of the Wolves Iraq"

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

[CanYoAssDigIt] Fwd: [Newsletter] The Conversation Today - The Mohammed cartoon: cultural sensitivity versus free speech

Here's an example of free exercise of really dumb speech.  they wouldn't publish a cartoon of Jesus thumping blacks with a burning cross, but they think this is a big prinicipled stand.  They should print whatever they want.  and they should feel like the shitheals that they are.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The Conversation <conversation@kuow.org>
Date: Feb 2, 2006 11:13 AM
Subject: [Newsletter] The Conversation Today - The Mohammed cartoon: cultural sensitivity versus free speech
To: mattlove1@earthlink.net

     
 

The Conversation
with Ross Reynolds

Weekdays 1-2 pm PST


Thursday, February 2, 2006

It began as a Danish newspaper cartoon of the Muslim Prophet Mohammed. His turban was shaped like a bomb with a burning fuse. It's turned into an international incident on the fault line between cultural sensitivity and free speech. The cartoon outraged many Muslims. Pictures of Mohammed are considered idolatry. There have been demonstrations from Turkey to the Gaza Strip, a boycott of Danish products throughout the Middle East, and even calls in some quarters for a religious decree to attack Danish troops serving in Iraq. For their part, defiant newspapers in Europe reprinted the cartoons. They asserted a right to blasphemy. Now right wing talk shows are getting in the on act, stirring up a 'Buy Danish' campaign. When does cultural sensitivity trump free speech, and when doesn't it?

Call in your thoughts before the show to 206-221-3663 or send email to conversation@kuow.org.   Join us on the air by calling  206-543-5869 or 1-800-289-5869. 

Guest information and links to articles and other research will be available at The Conversation homepage by 12 noon today PST. 

 


 
     

KUOW · 4518 University Way NE, Suite 310 · Seattle · WA · 98105

Subscribe Unsubscribe Preferences Send To A Friend
Powered by Mynewsletter Builder  

A member of The ByRegion Network  
report spam


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




[CanYoAssDigIt] Correction on your Band Name Origins page...

It just now struck me... man, I am so slow - I loved The Thompson
Twins "hold me now" back then - even learned it and played a cover
version at open mics.

My wife, who grew up in South Africa and had a different cultural
background than me (USA), loves Tintin, and first the books, then a
Canadian animation on DVD became part of my life...

Yet it took me until today to think "hey, d'ya suppose"... your page
(http://www.geocities.com/temptations_page/origins.html#tt) confirmed
it:

"The Thompson Twins -Despite the band being a trio, they took their
name from a pair of characters, identical twins featured in Tintin, a
French comic series. The bumbling, mustachioed detectives are known
from their odd speech patters and the even odder fact that their only
dissimilarity is their different last names --- one is Thomson, the
other is Thompson, "with a P, as in psychoanalysis."

***
But it's a hell of a world, isn't it? You provide this generous
service, and all you ask in return is that I Tell you my thoughts and
dreams. Instead I offer petty criticism. Tintin is a Belgian
character, created by a Belgian cartoonist, Hergé (Georges Rémi), who
first appeared in 1929 in a children's supplement to a Belgian daily
newspaper, Le Vingtième Siècle.

Our scrappy Tintin is no surrender monkey, though I'm sure that now
and again Tintin negotiated the vending of some cheesy comestibles.

I don't want to be too pushy about this, but I would just hate to see
how my wife's tears would well up if she saw your page before you
correct it.

And to be extremely pedantic - Thomson and Thompson have one
additional dissimilarity. The moustache of one of the detectives (I
don't know which one, perhaps my wife, while dabbing away her tears,
could tell you) curls up slightly at the tips. The other doesn't. I
now that extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof, therefore, I
attach a picture that provides that proof.

You have my personal assurances that (unlike the Magruder film) this
picture has not been tampered with.


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Wednesday, February 01, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: [Bizarro_UltraZine] Julia Roberts' Broadway Debut Sparks Ticket-Buying Frenzy

I was worried about what was going to happen to elderly people and college students, but now I'm not worried anymore because a lot of people are buy Tickets to see Julia Roberts.
 
Along similar lines, I am no longer concerned that over 2245 Americans, and more importantly , between 150,000 and 250,000 Iraqis (according to Lancet) have died in Iraq since the invasion, because some people are going to play football.
 
House approves $39 billion cut to Medicaid, student loans:
 
The bill passed by a vote of 216-214, largely along party lines. Republicans hailed the five-year, $39 billion budget-cutting bill as an important first step to restoring discipline on spending. Democrats attacked the measure as an assault on college students and Medicaid patients and said powerful Washington lobbyists had too much influence on it.
 


On 2/1/06, kdhaisch@aol.com < kdhaisch@aol.com> wrote:
from the IMDb...
 
 
 
Actress Julia Roberts' Broadway debut in Three Days Of Rain has sparked a buying frenzy , causing ticket websites to crash shortly after seats went on sale on Saturday.
 
Tickets to see the Pretty Woman star on the New York stage are costing fans a pretty penny, with the only ones left being premium seats which cost $251.25 each.
 
The show is nearly sold out and scored $7 million in advanced sales in one day. The Oscar-winning actress will play two characters in the limited run of Tony-winner Richard Greenberg's family mystery. Three Days Of Rain will run from March 28 to June 18.
 
 
 
 
.


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS






SPONSORED LINKS
Holy land tour Holy basil Holy land
Holy bible Holy land gifts Holy water


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Monday, January 30, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] maximum sucking power

I heard that phrase used on a tv vacuum cleaning commercial, but it
could be applied to television in general. It's all so very awful,
but there is a special place in hell for the creators of wife swap and
dancing with the stars.

Speaking of the latter, my wife and I watched Wayne's World the other
day (having grown up with two brothers, I think that guy things go
over better with her than chick flicks like "Lost in Translation" and
"The Terminal."

In the special features, Tia Carrare said that she owes her career to
the Wayne's World people.

Given her current status as someone who was mildly famous for
something once but nobody remembers quite what, now reduced to
scrambling for crumbs on "reality" tv, perhaps she should consider a
lawsuit against Wayne, Garth, et al.


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: eSkeptic: Coast to Coast; annual conference; 9/11

I hope you can explain something to me about what this "skeptic" thing is all about. 

I don't think it was you, I think it was that other crowd, the skeptical inquirer, who thought Scooby Doo was good for kids, because the solutions to Scooby mysteries always involved some sort of tortuously complicated conspiracy, and not supernatural elements.  But dude, rubber masks that you can't tell from a real human face, and a talking dog?  What's up with that?  Do you guys like that talking dog?

Another talking dog I wonder about is Michael Crichton, with his tortuously complicated conspiracy theories about how global warming isn't a threat, but mind-controlling lefty activists are.  It seems reasonable to me that Crichton would be at the conference as the token kook ( John Mack played that role in the the SCICOP conference I went to in Seattle). But Skepticism is so hard to figure out, he might be there to play Carl Sagan (who played himself at the same conference).

I also wonder about those two entertainers who work for the CATO Institute. CATO seems to be dedicated to the proposition that capitalism is the only scientific model for economic and social arrangement, and any attempt to measure externalized costs is the result of some sort of nature worshipping irrational religious impulse.  The fat guy and the quiet guy wear their paychecks on their sleeves, but they keep getting awards for being so damn skeptical.  I'm confused by how skeptics organize themselves in the world, so I'm not sure if it's the SCICOP guys (who surely live up to their acronym, as they work very hard to direct intellectual traffic into approved lanes of thought) or if you guys that support them, or both.  So I'm asking you please tell me:  In your world, are these guys talking dogs, or guys in rubber masks so real you can't tell them from the real thing (and therefore acceptable) or are they "free market" religious zealots who's views are disqualified because of their extreme bias?

Thanks for any information you can give me on this.

On 1/23/06, Michael Shermer <skepticssociety@skeptic.com > wrote:

eSkeptic: the email newsletter of the Skeptics Society

Monday, January 23rd, 2006

This Evening!
Michael Shermer on Art Bell's
Coast to Coast AM radio show

Monday, January 23rd
11pm—2am, Pacific Standard Time

Tonight, Michael Shermer will appear on Art Bell's Coast to Coast AM national radio show. George Noory presents the "Skeptics Cage: Two go in, one comes out." Michael Shermer will be debating one scientist each hour on various aspects of new scientific thought. The line-up: Dr. Gary Schwartz, Russell Targ, and Dean Radin. You can tune in live on AM radio stations across the US (free), XM radio channel 165, or you can pay for a subscription to the podcast from the Coast to Coast AM website.


Hubble photo of The Orion Nebula

This image of the Orion Nebula reveals at least 153 glowing protoplanetary disks (dubbed "proplyds") that are believed to be embryonic solar systems that will eventually form planets. (NASA image courtesy of GRIN)

lecture reminder…

The Soul of Science
Bootstrapping Meaning, Purpose & Spirituality

with Dr. Michael Shermer

Friday, January 27th, 9:30 am
at James Randi's The Amaz!ng Meeting 4
at Stardust Hotel, Las Vegas

How can we find spiritual meaning and purpose in a scientific worldview? Spirituality is a way of being in the world, a sense of one's place in the cosmos, a relationship to that which extends beyond our selves. There are many sources of spirituality; religion may be the most common, but it is by no means the only. Anything that generates a sense of awe may be a source of spirituality. Science does this in spades. Dr. Shermer shows how.


photo of Susan Blackmore at the conference

Susan Blackmore speaking at the 2005 annual conference

Brain, Mind & Consciouness
– our 2005 conference now on DVD!

A three DVD set of the Skeptic Society's "Brain, Mind & Consciousness" conference is now available. Held at Caltech in May 2005, this includes 30–50 minute talks by Michael Shermer, Roger Bingham, Christof Koch, Alison Gopnik, Richard McNally, Terry Sejnowski, Susan Blackmore, John Allman, Paul Zak, Hank Schlinger, and Ursula Goodenough.

ORDER the 3 DVD set >

READ Lee Traynor's synopsis of the conference >

The Environmental Wars:
The Science Behind the Politics

– announcing our 2006 annual conference!

June 2nd–4th, 2006
California Institute of Technology

with Dr. Brian Fagan, Dr. Gregory Benford, Dr. Donald Prothero, Dr. Michael Shermer, special guest Michael Crichton, and others to be announced.

Every year the Skeptics Society hosts a conference which sees skeptics from all across North America and Europe converge for lively conversation, debate, and collaboration. Each conference centers around a specific theme, which allows us to cultivate an expert and informative panel of guest speakers.


photo of "Ground Zero" by Roderick Yang

photo of "Ground Zero" by Roderick Yang

In this week's eSkeptic, we present Richard Morrock's review of The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11, by David Ray Griffin (Olive Branch Press, 2004, ISBN 1566565529)

Richard Morrock is a writer based in New York. He has been active with the skeptics movement and has lectured on a variety of subjects to skeptical groups in New York and Philadelphia. He is also involved with the International Psychohistorical Association, of which he has served as vice president and newsletter editor. He is currently working on a book on psychohistory, along with a musical comedy based on the first term of the Bush administration.


9/11:
A Date That Will Live in Infamy

review by Richard Morrock

David Ray Griffin's fanciful tale of Bush administration complicity in the 9/11 terrorist attack is a perfect example of the kind of conspiratorial thinking discussed by George Case in Skeptic Vol. 11 No. 4. There isn't much to be learned about the fateful events from Griffin's silly book, but he gives us some useful insight into the origins of paranoia.

Most writers on a subject do what is called research on the material, which means reading books, conducting interviews, and tracking down documents. This consumes far too much time and effort for conspiracy buffs like Griffin. His approach consists of asking disturbing questions, ignoring the actual evidence, speculating about the possible answers, assuming the worst-case scenario, and then drawing up his indictment of the administration based on his assumptions, even where they are in flagrant contradiction to widely-known facts.

Starting with the dubious "who benefits argument?", Griffin concludes that since President George W. Bush profited in terms of political capital from the 9/11 attacks, he had to be behind them. Given that premise, he argues that the U.S. government masterminded the whole catastrophe from beginning to end, with the al-Qaeda hijackers being either innocent bystanders or U.S. secret agents. The planes that hit the World Trade Center — Flights 11 and 175 — were actually piloted by remote control, with their command center at No. 7 WTC, the 45-story office building across a narrow side street from the North Tower. In addition, the impact of the planes did not cause the buildings to collapse; that was the work of controlled explosions set off inside the Towers. As for the Pentagon, it was a guided missile or, no, maybe a military plane that hit the building, with Flight 77 disappearing inside the smoke and flames. And Flight 93, which crashed in Shanksville, PA, was actually shot down by the U.S. military because the passengers were on the brink of taking it over. The Bush administration didn't want the hijackers taken alive, Griffin insists, because they presumably could have proven their innocence. How strange that 20th hijacker Zacarias Moussaoui should have been kept alive after the 9/11 events, not to mention the mastermind of the affair, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, captured in Pakistan and now in U.S. custody.

One of the points Griffin raises is why the South Tower collapsed half an hour before the North Tower, although it was struck 15 minutes later. From this alleged discrepancy in the official story, Griffin concludes that the government had planted explosives in the WTC the previous weekend, using a power blackout as cover, and had dynamited the buildings. He never considers the other explanation: the South Tower collapsed faster because the plane impacted on a lower floor, and more floors were therefore set on fire. Any glance at the photograph of the second impact will show this.

He fails to explain why the government would have waited nearly an hour to explode its bombs in the South Tower, which would have allowed many people to escape; the North Tower didn't collapse for one and 3/4 hours, and nearly all of the WTC workers who died were in the impacted floors or above. Did Bush's remote control have a low battery?

Griffin actually does claim that No. 7 WTC, which collapsed at 5:20 pm, was blown up by explosives, and this is taken as proof that Washington was behind it. But what would the motive be? Blowing up an already-evacuated office building after thousands had died in the Twin Towers would seem like a waste of dynamite, not to mention office space. Did Bush think that public opinion had not been sufficiently inflamed by the 3,000 deaths? Do most Americans even know that a third office building, far smaller than the Towers, was also lost on that day? Griffin never explores that possibility that No. 7 was demolished because it had been contaminated by the white dust from the nearby North Tower. Explosives were used because, at 45 stories, No. 7 was too tall for a wrecking crane.

Jet fuel is kerosene, argues Griffin. Kerosene could not have caused a fire hot enough to melt steel, which happened at the Twin Towers. Perhaps Griffin has never attended a barbecue, where kerosene is used to ignite charcoal briquettes, and the charcoal fire then cooks the food. Something similar happened at the Twin Towers, where the jet fuel ignited carpets, furniture, books and papers, which then produced enough heat to bring down the burning floors; their impact on the floors below produced the force that led to the Towers' collapse.

There is the question of what Bush knew on the morning of 9/11 and when he knew it. Some have claimed that Bush was lying when he said he saw the first impact on the Twin Towers, since there had been no live coverage of that attack; the second impact, about 15 minutes later, was covered by cameramen photographing the fire from the first. It would seem likely that when Bush watched the second crash on TV, as he waited to enter the 2nd-grade classroom in Florida where he was planning to read My Pet Goat, he mistakenly thought he was watching the first. Not until about 20 minutes later was he informed that there were two crashes, indicating a terrorist attack rather than an accident, and at that point he started to look worried. About six or seven minutes later, he left the school.

Well, why wasn't he, or his staff, concerned about his being targeted by the terrorists? Doesn't that prove, as Griffin indicates, that Bush was aware he was in no danger, and therefore involved in the attack? Not necessarily, given that both attacks were in New York, a thousand miles from Florida, and the attack on the Pentagon hadn't happened yet. Furthermore, it is unlikely that the hijackers could have singled out the Sarasota elementary school; all of their targets were highly visible landmarks which could be identified from many miles away, whereas urban areas have numerous indistinguishable schools.

Why wasn't the Air Force ordered to shoot down Flight 77 as it streaked through the sky on its way to hit the Pentagon? The official 9/11 Commission story is that planes were sent north to intercept Flight 11, with the White House and Pentagon unaware that it had already crashed in New York, and that the threat was coming from another plane, heading in from the west. Griffin believes that Vice President Dick Cheney, in charge of the situation in Washington while Bush was flying to Nebraska in Air Force One, deliberately avoided intercepting Flight 77 so that the Pentagon would be struck. One wonders what Donald Rumsfeld, still in his office at the Pentagon, might have had to say about that! Griffin asks why the Pentagon wasn't evacuated, but never considers the fact that the government had no idea which target in the Washington area had been selected by the terrorists. Nor does he concern himself with the political fallout if an enemy attack on United States soil had been followed by our military leadership fleeing in panic from their still-intact offices.

Then there is the matter of the disappearing wreckage at the Pentagon, of which conspiracy buffs have made much. Photographs taken in the immediate aftermath of the impact show no sign of airplane debris. That must mean that it was a missile that hit the Pentagon, implicating our diabolical government once again. Official accounts indicate that Flight 77 smashed through several of the concentric rings that make up the Pentagon, so that the wreckage all came to rest well inside the building.

Flight 93, which crashed in rural Pennsylvania as the passengers attempted to wrest it back from the hijackers, may actually represent the one instance where Griffin does cast some light on the matter. The original official story had it that the passengers made their way into the cockpit, but that the plane crashed during the brief struggle. Later, it was announced that the passengers never made it through the door, and the government speculated that the pilot, Ziad Jarrah, downed the plane as the desperate fight broke out in the passenger compartment. Of course, given the fact that Jarrah planned to sacrifice his life for this mission, it doesn't seem likely that he would have aborted it while there was still some chance of success. Griffin indicates that open cell phone lines recorded two explosions during the fight, followed by the sound of rushing wind; he reports an eyewitness saying that the plane disintegrated in the air, and mentions that one engine was found a mile and a half from the rest of the debris.

This is proof to Griffin that the Air Force downed Flight 93 with a missile, making the government responsible for the deaths of the heroic passengers who nearly foiled the fourth hijacking. He backs up this improbable claim by mentioning that someone saw a white military plane in the sky near the hijacked flight, overlooking the detail that military planes on such a mission would travel in formations of two or more, and that they are rarely white.

Griffin also mentions that the Flight 93 hijackers declared that they had a bomb when they took over the plane, but that the passengers regarded this as a bluff. He never considers the possibility that the hijackers were not bluffing, and that they set off the bomb (more likely two) when they were rushed by the passengers. This would account for the explosions, the sound of the wind on the cell phones, the crash of the plane, the engine landing more than a mile from the fuselage, and the peculiar path of the flight in the last few minutes before it crashed. In the map in the 9/11 report, Flight 93 makes a U-turn in northern Ohio after being hijacked, and then heads southeast, in a straight line, aiming directly for Washington. While over western Pennsylvania, it veers to the left and then makes a clockwise semi-circle, as if Jarrah has suddenly found it impossible to steer. Was this the result of a missile, a fight in the passenger compartment, or the desperate hijackers setting off their bombs?

The 9/11 attacks made Americans feel helpless, even more so than our defeat in Vietnam. Theories of administration complicity in 9/11, based on total denial of even the most self-evident facts, serve as a defense against these admittedly uncomfortable feelings, and allow us to feel omnipotent once again. Our government is all-powerful and all-knowing; a bunch of Middle Eastern fanatics couldn't possibly take us by surprise, could they? Better a government that's totally evil than one which leaves us helpless in the face of foreign terrorists.


eSkeptic is a free, public newsletter published (almost) weekly by the Skeptics Society. Contents are Copyright © 2006 Michael Shermer, the Skeptics Society, and the authors and artists. Permission is granted to print, distribute, and post with proper citation and acknowledgment. Contact us at skepticssociety@skeptic.com . | This webpage is coded by Rocketday Arts to W3C compliant XHTML 1.1, adhering to accessibility guidelines set forth by the W3C's Web Accessibility Initiative and US Section 508, using Dublin Core RDF metadata. | Subscribe to eSkeptic by sending an email to join-skeptics@lyris.net. Unsubscribe by sending an email to leave-skeptics@lyris.net. | Browse, search, and read the eSkeptic archives online. Read other articles, order books, cds and dvds, browse announcements of events, and subscribe to Skeptic magazine at www.skeptic.com.



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




[CanYoAssDigIt] Day-O! Harry Belafonte stands up for Dubya.

Thank you Harry, for not letting Kanye West get away with that terrible slander.

AMY GOODMAN: Kanye West, after Hurricane Katrina, said President Bush
doesn't like black people. Do you agree?

HARRY BELAFONTE: I do not know that I could look upon President Bush
as someone who actively works every day of his life to oppress and to
kill black people as a direct act of race. I think his insensitivity,
in the class frame, being who he is, coming from the privileges that
he does, being one who pursues the edge of imperial ambition -- not so
much the edge, he's right smack in the center of it -- he can be
expected to do those things, which will cruelly administer no relief
at all to those who are oppressed, who are poor. And in that act,
because of the way in which our society is structured, a large group
of brown people, a large group of yellow people, a large group of
black people, are on the cutting edge, are on the forefront of this
nation's poverty. And therefore, we feel the brunt of it.

One cannot help but wonder that if what happened in Katrina in that
region of America had happened somewhere in Maine or had happened
somewhere else in America where white sensibilities and white life
would have been in great jeopardy, that our nation would have been
that blurred, and certainly our government, to what was happening to
the citizens who are not white. I think somewhere in the American
psyche, black people are expendable when we try to sustain our
positions of privilege and our positions of power, just as I think
people in the Middle East are expendable. I don't think America really
knows who we are. We don't know our fellow citizens. We don't know the
nations we invade. We don't have a real deep and honest sense of who
we are as a people, both on the good side of the ledger, to who we are
as a people that comes from the dark side of the ledger. We are the
most uninformed people on the face of the earth. And I don't say that
as hyperbole.


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Sunday, January 29, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] News story

On the news, they showed George Bushes Jr and Sr and their respective
wives, the battleax and the other one, going to church. I thought,
"why is this news?"

My answer came when the church vomited them back out!


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[CanYoAssDigIt] Why can't Americans read?

Why can't people read? If people weren't so stupid, they would know
why - I have explained it in my groundbreaking work, establishing that
every 18 months, people are half as smart.

Sometime around the middle of 2007, best evidence is that 60 million
Americans will no longer be able to read. Some of them will be us, so
enjoy it while you can. Assuming you can.

WHO WILL TELL THE PEOPLE?

By Sheila Samples
01/28/2006 10:18:38 PM EST
Keywords: Mike Malloy, 1984, Air America
By Sheila Samples

And who will tell the people
that free speech is a ruse;
The corporations run the country
and then they make the news.
Is it media or mind control
heroic victories or crime?
Who will tell the people...
that we are living in these times.
~Song by Willie Nelson

In his essay on "Character" Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote, "A chief event
in life is the day in which we have encountered a mind that startled
us." I've had such days, many of them through encounters with Emerson
himself, but never have I been startled or even remotely surprised by
anything belched out by the Barbie and Ken assembly line of today's
corporate mind-control media.

George Orwell wrote that people who neither read nor ask questions
will ultimately lose all desire to question "Big Brother." What is so
frightening as we descend into the new world order fascism is not that
we no longer read -- it's that we no longer can read.

Researchers estimate as many as 30 million Americans -- many of them
college graduates -- cannot read. They're unable to comprehend news
stories or even instructions. They said they were "stunned," but could
offer no explanation for the steep drop in literacy. I don't know
what's more depressing -- that Americans can't read or, after studying
the phenomenon, researchers lack the critical skills to discern why.


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Saturday, January 28, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] Mortifying moment on TV a few minutes ago.

I just saw the pretender in chief on TV discussing the Palestinian
elections. It was a piteous sight. I'd say he was a liar and a
hypocrite, but I am convinced that he doesn't even know what he's
saying. He's suffered a stroke, or he's back on the bottle, or he's
under heavy sedation. Perhaps, like Reagan, we will learn the truth,
though probably only after he leaves office.

I wish there was a way to say "hey, I'm sorry. I didn't vote for this
guy, we're trying to stop him, we know he's an embarrassment, we are
trying hard to restore democracy to this country.

Word


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[CanYoAssDigIt] Abramoff and Saddam - separated at birth?

Bush can't remember meeting Abramoff, just like Rumsfeld can't
remember his grip and grin sessions with Saddam!

Bush picks Abramoff prosecutor for federal judgeship
Elisabeth Bumiller, New York Times
Friday, January 27, 2006
Washington -- The investigation into Jack Abramoff, the disgraced
Republican lobbyist, took a provocative new turn Thursday when the
Justice Department said the chief prosecutor in the inquiry would step
down next week because he had been nominated to a federal judgeship by
President Bush.

The prosecutor, Noel Hillman, is chief of the department's Office of
Public Integrity, and the move ends his involvement in an
investigation that has reached into the administration as well as into
the top ranks of the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill.

Democrats swiftly questioned the move's timing and called for a
special prosecutor as Bush faced a barrage of questions about why he
would not make public "grip and grin" photographs of himself with
Abramoff. The photographs apparently show Bush and Abramoff smiling at
White House Hanukkah parties and Republican fundraising receptions.

Bush's view, which he offered at a news conference Thursday morning
that was peppered with questions about Abramoff, was that the
photographs were so common as to be almost meaningless and that it was
part of his job "to shake hands with people and smile." He said he
couldn't remember posing for the pictures, or, for that matter, even
meeting Abramoff.

The White House, which announced Bush's selection of Hillman in a
routine e-mail message Wednesday afternoon that included 15 other
nominations to judgeships and federal jobs, dismissed the calls for a
special prosecutor.

"It's nothing but pure politics," said Scott McClellan, the White
House secretary. "The Justice Department is holding Mr. Abramoff to
account, and the career Justice prosecutors are continuing to fully
investigate the matter."

Special prosecutors have not been especially welcome at this White
House, where Patrick Fitzgerald, the special counsel in the CIA leak
case, is more than two years into an investigation that has resulted
in the indictment of a top vice presidential aide, Lewis "Scooter"
Libby, and has left Karl Rove, the president's chief political
adviser, in legal limbo.

Hillman's departure from the Justice Department creates a vacancy at
the top of the Abramoff investigation only three weeks after Abramoff,
once one of the city's most powerful Republican lobbyists and a major
fund-raiser for Bush, announced his guilty plea and agreed to testify
against others, possibly including members of Congress.

A former senior White House budget official, David Safavian, has been
indicted in the case on charges of lying about his contacts with
Abramoff, a former lobbying partner. The Justice Department's plea
agreement with Abramoff makes clear that prosecutors are investigating
several members of Congress and other public officials who accepted
gifts from the lobbyist in exchange for official acts.

Colleagues at the Justice Department say Hillman has been involved in
day-to-day management of the Abramoff investigation since it began
almost two years ago. The inquiry, which initially focused on
allegations that Abramoff defrauded Indian tribe casinos out of tens
of millions of dollars in lobbying fees, is being described within the
department as the most important federal corruption investigation in a
generation, given the large number of public officials who may be
implicated.

Yahoo! Groups Links


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[CanYoAssDigIt] Matt's excellent adventures in cyberspace, pt. 3

megaxslut is currently not in your Messenger List.
Add to your Messenger List (Ctrl+Shift+A) Report as Spam (Alt+Shift+R)

megaxslut: hi... anyone there?
valis2001us: hey megaxslut, you seem like a really nice girl
megaxslut: oh your there hi...
valis2001us: I don't tea bag the ladies, you know, I potato sack them
megaxslut: a//s/l (age sex location)?
valis2001us: 104, transvestite, mars
megaxslut: iim 27/f/USA. was lookin at your profile. thought you might
like to chat.
valis2001us: yeah, baby I'm ready.
megaxslut: so what have you been up to valis2001us??
valis2001us: quantum physics is my favorite topic
megaxslut: i have some pics on my homepage the liink is in my
profile, still working on it ...
valis2001us: Splitting atoms and watching tv
megaxslut: cool. i was just hangin out watching tv. i was getting
kinda horny (*blushes)
valis2001us: do you have any pictures of neutrons on your page?
megaxslut: how about you send me some pics
valis2001us: Hey, I'm watching tv too
megaxslut: feel like a little cybrr fun with me ? please please...
valis2001us: I have a picture of a lemur that's cute
valis2001us: and then I could cut your head off
megaxslut: i think ill just take that as a yes... being ass that im
starting to get real horny here.. lol ok?
valis2001us: are you being an ass? I'm being a giraffe
valis2001us: you chicks are getting so predictable in your come ons...
megaxslut: alright how bout i get down on my knees in froht of you
and help you out of your pants?
megaxslut: tell me what you want me to do with you while i slip out of
my ppanties
valis2001us: say something new and different
megaxslut: was just browwsing the yahoo profile thing. looked like you
might be an interesting person to chat with.
valis2001us: fix me a sandwich,
valis2001us: I'd be your pal for life
megaxslut: oh yeah babe.. dont stop. while i slide my hand down
between my legw and part my moist lips
valis2001us: could you iron my shirts?
valis2001us: maybe get me a beer while I'm watching educational tv?
valis2001us: open university, that's where I learn all my physics
megaxslut: oh it feels so good. Im holding your pulsing cock in my
hand, my shiny red fingernails dig gently into your bballs, while my
full, soft lips engulf the mass of your meat
valis2001us: and then you could, like, get a job and support both of us
megaxslut: open my eebsite so you can look at me while im sucking you.
use the link in my profile!
megaxslut: whatt do you think of my pics?
valis2001us: oh, megaxslut I love you, will you marry me?
megaxslut: shit the phone. dont stop stroking it. hold n...
valis2001us: I know this is kind of sudden, but I love you
valis2001us: please please please marry me
megaxslut: sorry, I have to take this call, probbly take bout five
minutes. If you want, come to my page and lets finish this. I have my
cam on there cyberfungirls dot com look for me on there
valis2001us: I want to stay home and watch tv my whole life
valis2001us: we can be so good for each other
valis2001us: megaxslut, come back!
valis2001us: Megaxslut, where are you?
valis2001us: Megaxslut, I need you, just like a dog needs a bone
valis2001us: like an actor needs a role
valis2001us: hello?
valis2001us: hello?
valis2001us: hello?


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Thursday, January 26, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: [Bizarro_UltraZine] mangafolk: Manga guy and Manga butch

> > thigh hose, low cut sheer white blouses, what
> > Condolezzy will be wearing after she's inaugerated
>
>
> NOW you're talkin'!!!

bush, cheney, rice vacation while NOLA floods

what do you do in the face of one of the greatest natural disasters in
the history of your country? go shoe shopping:

The criticism is all the sharper because the President did nothing
to alter his holiday schedule for 48 hours. Vice-President Dick Cheney
remains on holiday in Wyoming. Condoleezza Rice, the Secretary of
State, returned to Washington after being seen shopping for $7,000
shoes in Manhattan as New Orleans went under.

****
Astonishing, isn't it? people remember a statement of callous
indifference that Marie Antoinette DIDN'T say centuries ago... but
they think a woman who really did display almost unbelievably cruel
indifference just months ago should be president!

There is no better evidence that I can think of to demonstrate that
every 18 months people are becoming half as intelligence.


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: Looking for an answer of one sort or another...

If you do a Google image search on "realdoll" returns 2,320 results.
This "hidden" picture at la.indymedia.org is one of the top 8 hits.

It seems like that's an unfortunate association that could best be
broken by deleting the picture, not hiding it.

So what if most of the people that find it are pervs? I have no
interest in sex dolls, and I found it that way.

On 12/26/05, laindy <laindy@slaptech.net> wrote:
> Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I agree. It's not cool.
>
> The posts go up, but most are not seen by the moderators.
>
> The photo has been hidden.
>
> Joe Swordfish wrote:
>
> >I ran across the attached picture on your website at
> >
> >http://la.indymedia.org/uploads/2005/02/realdoll.jpg
> >
> >more or less by accident.
> >
> >Can you explain it? I was inder the somewhat hazy impression that
> >indymedia was a progressive organization.
> >
> >When I saw this picture, you know what I thought?
> >
> >I'll tell you what I thought. I thought "that ain't too cool!"
> >
> >That's what I thought.
> >
> >
> >--
> >***
> >Democracy is a form of religion. It is the worship of jackals by jackasses.
> >- H.L. Mencken
> >
> >www.soundclick.com/bloodparadise
> >jackal music for jackass people
> >
> >
> >
>
>

--
***
Democracy is a form of religion. It is the worship of jackals by jackasses.
- H.L. Mencken

www.soundclick.com/pseudojandek
jackal music for jackass people


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: do you remember...

Ian Tanner.

His name is Ian Tanner.

His webpage is at:

http://www.iantanner.com/

god, this thing was just chasing it's tail around through my wetware
for two days... I was driving myself crazy. then yesterday his first
name came to me... my internal monologue went something like....
"Monty"? ... no, not "monty".... "Trevor?" .... no, not "trevor"....
"Ian"?.... no, not "Ian".... "Ian?" no, it still isn't Ian.... "Ian?"
...no... "well, you dumbfuck, you've been at this for two days, and
you haven't come up with anything better. It's not Stephen, Robbie,
Alex or any of the ones you tried this morning." ... "ok, just as a
thought exercise, I'll go with Ian for a while. But it's not Ian."

A half hour later, the damp, dark folds of my brain coughed up his
last name, and hocked it up into my conscious mind like a loogie:
"Tanner."

"Ian Tanner. I guess it was Ian after all."

"Told ya so."

His stuff that I liked best was a bunch of stuff he gathered up and
called "songs nobody will like" or "songs everybody will hate."

Does any of this sound familiar yet?

On 1/21/06, Matt Love <matt.mattlove1@gmail.com> wrote:
> yes, that is a double good goddamn it! this is a fuck
>
> a giant, double headed one in the cunt one in the anus fuck
>
> oh well
>
> On 1/21/06, Joe Sibley <joesibley@comcast.net> wrote:
> > Well, I meet so much music...Console yourself with the knowledge that
> > having partial memory is better than none. I don't remember this at all.
> > GOD DAMN IT!
> >
> > Matt Love wrote:
> >
> > >... shit it's been bugging me for days. I should remember, we had a
> > >not bad correndence going. but it's gone, gone, gone... the name of
> > >the guy with the brian wilson fixation... with the webern inspired
> > >piece... did I ever burn a cd for you? if so, you might have his
> > >name, if not, I'm screwed.
> > >
> > >shit, my stupid stupid mind...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] Re: [Bizarro_UltraZine] Kate Moss to Publish Autobiography

Oh yeah, blame the drug addicted rock star.  Like that when her problems started. Like he was the first drug addicted rock star she ever got with.  Why do models date rock stars anyway?

They like their crooked, bad teeth?  Their bad skin and ugly noses? Their weirdly puny, hairless and hunchbacked frames?  Their toothpick arms and stupid haircuts?

No!  Rock stars have the best drug connections!

On 1/24/06, kdhaisch@aol.com < kdhaisch@aol.com> wrote:
from the IMDb...
 
 
 
 
Kate Moss has signed a $1.8-million deal for the rights to her autobiography, after Virgin mogul Sir Richard Branson convinced her she should set the record straight on her turbulent 2005.
 
The British supermodel began dating drug addicted rocker Pete Doherty at the start of the year, and her world came tumbling down when photographs showing her snorting cocaine were published by a British newspaper in September.
 
Branson's spokesperson says, "Richard and Kate have agreed to bring out her autobiography. It's a chance for her to put across her side of the story."  Moss has since managed to salvage her career, but she will still face police questioning over her drug use when she next returns to the UK.
 
 
SNORT !!!
 
 
 
 
.


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS






SPONSORED LINKS
Holy land tour Holy basil Holy land
Holy bible Holy land gifts Holy water


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Monday, January 23, 2006

[CanYoAssDigIt] A Sincere Thank You

I am glad I have the news to tell me what to think. They had a news
story on upcoming Palestinian elections. Before the commercial break,
they told me that when they got back they would explain why "America
is dead set against the most popular party."

Well, it's an interesting construction, isn't it? I'm pretty sure
that most people in the US (they weren't talking about Venezuela or
Argentine, they meant the US) favor democracy, and don't have a
problem with democratic elections in which the people that get the
most votes win.

The regime in charge here has a passionate opposition to democracy
both here and abroad, and don't want the party that get the most votes
to win. They prefer global adherence to US standards of democracy -
the guy who doesn't get the most votes is the one that takes office,
if he's the one that will most favor the status quo.

This ruling elite (not America, as the news program would have it)
want the Palestinians to be ruled by people who will be most
accommodating to Israel's illegal aggression.

I sure am glad that the news is there to tell me what to think,
because otherwise I might make the mistake of supporting democracy.
Instead, I know what the party line is, and when anybody deviates from
it, I can viciously mock it. Maybe report the deviants to homeland
security.

Thank you network news, for telling me what to think!


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[CanYoAssDigIt] They'll Never Do That Again....

An elderly man in Florida had owned a large farm for several
years. He had a large pond in the back, fixed up nice:
picnic tables, horseshoe courts, a volleyball court, and
some apple and peach trees. The pond was properly shaped and
fixed up for swimming.

One evening the old farmer decided to go down to the pond
and look it over, as he hadn't been there for a while. He
grabbed a five gallon bucket to bring back some fruit.

As he neared the pond, he heard voices shouting and laughing
with glee. As he came closer he saw it was a bunch of young
women skinny-dipping in his pond.

He made the women aware of his presence and they all went to
the deep end. One of the women shouted to him, "We're not
coming out until you leave!"

The old man frowned, "I didn't come down here to watch you
ladies swim naked or make you get out of the pond naked."
Holding the bucket up he said, "I'm here to feed the
alligator."


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CanYoAssDigIt/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CanYoAssDigIt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[CanYoAssDigIt] Fwd: [Robitron] I think this was Jabberwacky

These chatbot designers love to chat about there bots, and to show off the cute things their bots said in conversation. 

I thought this was pretty good

the > preceeds the human's comments in the conversation below.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robby Garner <robby.garner@gmail.com>
Date: Jan 23, 2006 10:37 AM
Subject: [Robitron] I think this was Jabberwacky
To: Robitron@yahoogroups.com


>hello
Hello!

>Do you like fish?
What sort of fish.

>Cod?
Hello.

>Cod
Cod?

>yes
What is Cod?

>Cod is a kind of fish.
Please tell me more about a fish.

>Fish are small water breathing animals.
Fish are slimy!

>Yes, but they taste good.
Definitely. What about dogs?

>I've never tried dog.
You should try it. You will need a laboratory and a hunchback.




SPONSORED LINKS
Online social science degree Social science book Social science degree


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS





SPONSORED LINKS
Holy land tour Holy basil Holy land
Holy bible Holy land gifts Holy water


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS